The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I just walked out onto my porch to eat ice cream with my girlfriend, an a random Indian door dasher, who was boney and looked like every image your mind could conjure up of what an Indian looks like, complete with wispy facial hair, shows up carrying a Little Caesar's Pizza.

Indian on porch.jpg


He then stares at our door, looks at my girlfriend-- looks at me, and tries to give me the food, insisting it's my food. Keep in mind I had only been on my porch for a matter of seconds(less than ten), and was immediately barraged by an Indian, just waltzing up my steps. I tell the Indian, that he's at the wrong address, and he pulls out his phone, and shows me the address, which was nowhere near where he was supposed to be, and he was just going to give me this person's food, no questions asked, as he tries to put it in my hands. The address didn't even look similar. He just decided that this was the house. He then immediately takes his phone and starts making a call, which is answered by a black guy on the other end(which I can tell from the voice) while the Indian shoves it in my face, and asks me to make a phone call to the person he's supposed to deliver it to. I can hear the voice on the end, saying "What?" several times. I quickly yell at the Indian, "NO" and he skitters off the porch, and wanders several houses away, shambling slowly to his car, looking at houses with people to pester. After about 10 minutes he finally gets into his car, and by now I've finished my Nestle Drumstick, as he drives by and doubles back around, to drive in the opposite direction looking for the mysterious black guy who decided to door dash from Little Caesar's.

I couldn't believe and still can't believe that he was going to just give me a stranger's food, and then tried to have me make phone calls for him while standing on my porch.
 
balupton said:
was a fantastic time with fantastic people... we had been thinking it would be slumdog millionaire, but everyone was polite, educated, and the food at the restaurants and hotels we stayed at was the best I've ever had.
Click to expand...
Of course it did, Bangalore and Goa are the only places suitable for foreigners since they're both either technologically advanced or tourist traps. You can't expect the same somewhere else.

balupton said:
We quickly realised that my partner would require an escort everywhere, which the conference staff dutifully arranged. It's too long ago now to recollect how this need was recognised, I have a faint memory it was due to a rickshaw driver harassing her and a companion after only dropping her to the corner instead of the hotel proper.
Click to expand...
Surprising since Bangalore is very progressive but generally the way you avoid attention is a bad attire. It's very very easy to identify the rich and the affluent with their attire so they generally end up getting unwanted attention if they're out and about. Ofc being foreigners doesn't help but dressing less than modestly helps a bit to avoid attention. Also always carry something, pepper spray or whatever.

balupton said:
In one hotel, the health faucet (a hand bidet) was jam-packed with mosquito corpses.
Click to expand...
Unless you're staying five star, this is bound to be an issue unfortunately.
balupton said:
No one ate with cutlery, it was hands everywhere. People did not wash their hands either, as they did not trust the water, preferring to trust their own knowledge of where their hands had been. Neither of us got sick.
Click to expand...
This is downstream from religion. The general rule of thumb is the right hand is used for eating and writing and the left is used to wash the ass/genitals, so the left hand should never be used for anything else like shaking hands or greeting or preparing food cause it's seen as disrespectful or unsanitary. For left handers it's the opposite. People not washing hands is weird cause everyone does from what I know of.

balupton said:
In our accomodation in Hampi, there was a proper toilet, but no health faucet nor toilet paper in the toilets, just a bucket with water and a ladle — this is typical in rural south east asia - you need to carry paper with you if you don't want to use your hand.
Click to expand...
Ladle is weird, every bucket generally has a mug. You must've stayed in some really remote place.
balupton said:
Rickshaw drivers would never get us to where we needed to go on-time, even despite insisting they take the route on our GPS. I later discovered that they cannot afford spectacles, and have too much pride paired with desperation to admit that they cannot read the phone, so they rely only on the ways that they know and asking for directions. To get anywhere on time, we required Ubers which use GPS and are rich enough for eye-care.
Click to expand...
They're a class of nigger parasite who either fleece you or drive like shit. Can't really change them especially in Bangalore where they have an ego and act entitled to high fares.

balupton said:
From this experience, I always wondered why everyone who had visited India as tourists said it was great, but everyone who had motorbiked through it said it was an absolute shithole and their biggest regret, and that they would never do it again — c90 adventures comes to mind. Watching that quoted documentary above, it makes me finally understand.

I had been planning a motorbike tour of India for 2026, specifically of Kerala and Sri Lanka. However, after that documentary, and after observing an Indian acquaintance's regression into an undesirable association*, I've recognised that life is too short to bother with such a trip — there are so many places to tour that have fantastic scenery and food, but also have a respectful and humanising culture.
Click to expand...
You can, it's not that bad. Just pick your place right, if it's a hillstation or more civilized part of the countryside then fine. If it's a remote village or a similar establishment, get fucked basically.
balupton said:
* For the Indian acquaintance's regression, he always had a disposition to misogyny which was able to be curtailed with guidance, however in recent years, from what seems to me like a post-covid nationalisation and propagandisement of their internet and social media to extreme patriotism, he has radicalised to the point of evil and ignorance to things already discussed in this thread; rampant misogyny, deflecting blame to others, dehumanising all muslims, blind loyalty to Israel, that hindus are at war with muslims, that anything and everything is justified in times of war, only losers always play fair... and so on.
Click to expand...
That's one end, you haven't met the other end, the globohomo US DEI Soros worshipping people. Not quite anti west but vehemently pro west cause the west represents progressive shit to them. Both political extremes and the rich/affluent are pretty shit so it's best to pick your poison. Also while dehumanising muslims is bad, this is not their land and the expansion of the Arabian Caliphate into the Indian subcontinent is pretty gross just like in Britainistan/Britainabad.
balupton said:
Hinduism on the other hand, is just a "you do you, no matter how depraved, as long as you identify as Hindu, and leave me/us alone".
Click to expand...
Not really, people have their own definitions of Hinduism which is based on ritual practices and not fundamental principles. Civilizational fundamental principles are derived from religion but in Hinduism case theyre mostly anecdotal and the impetus is on the individual to refine their morals/principles, which leads to rampant degeneracy cause most of humanity lacks the self awareness to self regulate. Imagine if Christianity was only ritual practices and not behavioural prescriptions and you have a decent idea.
balupton said:
Nietzsche in Beyond Good and Evil posited the master-slave mindset dichotomy, where a master/ubermench is someone who has achieved salvation (claim of their destiny, self-authorship of their future, equality with God) by the memetic evolution of "How can I know what is good or evil, when I cannot even prove that it is I that thinks my own thoughts. Regardless, I am a natural man, in a natural world, and I must act. So which action? There are actions that I can control that produce observable universal progress, and actions that I can control that produce observable universal regression. Therefore, I will act supremely, and in doing so, realise thyself." without such, one assumes a slave character, a more primitive mindset, in which they have rejected personally uncovering the supreme, and by doing so, relegates to a fate of being subservient to extrinsic forces, rather than intrinsic ones.
Click to expand...
Christianity also practices slave morality, there's no real point here. There's no religion in the world which advocates for master morality, the closest you get is Buddhism which is itself an offshoot of Hinduism based on the principles of karma and will excluding the more ritualistic nonsense.
balupton said:
Jung in Aion posited that mother/god/nature/idol worship is primitive compared to father/God/civilisation/supremacy worship. Jung requires a quick glossary: god = a personification of a natural force, natural force = nature/evolution/civilisation pressure, God = the personification of all natural forces culminated into competitively-supreme hierarchy which by definition is unknowable in its entirety but can be progressively uncovered, sin = stepping away from God, idol = worshipping something that is not God (remember progressively discoverable but ultimately unknowable), child = dependent capable non-agent, man = independent capable agent, human = unlike animals humans are capable of salvation, salvation = same def as earlier when discussing Nietzsche. Jung viewed masculine monotheism as a civilising force towards God, requiring agentive disciplined action towards supremacy/God to go from human and child to man, in contrast the various feminine theisms (e.g the polytheism of Hinduism, Animism, Paganism, etc, but also the Virgin Mary worship of lower Europe and the Phillipines) are worshipping a temperamental deity that must be appeased in relative ways to nurture them as children, always remaining in a state of degraded agency and moral relativism.
Click to expand...
This is true, Hinduism or at least one section of it advocates against agency as everything depends on prostration towards God and rituals for the same. Lack of focus on good action and more focus on devotion/dogmatism to the religion as a substitute for good morals.

balupton said:
Ultimately, it seems Hinduism is a belief system / coping mechanism adopted to take pride in/inside one's existing self, without necessitating any change besides identification. Buddhism likewise seems designed as a belief system / coping mechanism rolled out to pacify those in repressed/oppressed economic/agentive situations to not want nor expect extrinsic betterment (this also applies to Mary worship in Philippines in which material progress is reset every year by natural disasters). Karma likewise seems adopted/propagated as an inverse-santa-claus sold to bitter people to placate their vindictiveness so they don't throw stones or revolt, believing instead a wishful power will do it, allowing abuses to continue and multiply, because the victims became pacified instead of revolutionary.
Click to expand...
It's not any less cope than Christianity especially Catholicism. It's not about pride, it's about achieving enlightenment or escaping the birth cycle and the suffering of life. Those who are more proud without sufficient reason generally are seen as heretical or having a capacity for evil.
 
Indian encounter from earlier this week. I was sitting on my commie block flat's back yard, smoking a cigarette and speaking with a relative on the phone. One indian from group of them walked across the just seeded grass to come to ask me for a cigarette. I gave him the polite "do you mind" but his response was just to start talking louder and raising his voice when I ignored him. Hate saying this, but ended up giving him one, just to get rid of pajeet yelling to my face. Can't even commit slow suicide in peace *sigh*
 
TheCrackMonkey said:
Reposting from a similar thread, anon claims to be a psychiatrist explains why Indian society is so fucked.

View attachment 5883767
Click to expand...
Larp lol dowry is paid by the womans family there have been murders over it

Also reason for Murdering female babies by poor parents they can't afford the dowry.

Dragged Into Sunlight said:
They're walking it to their temple or whatever. It's a nice changeup from what usually happens. They normally manage to run them into power lines and electrocute dozens.

Also funny: being in an anti-India group of Facebook and seeing half the comments are coming from Pakis and Bengalis. YOURE THE SAME FUCKING THING
Click to expand...
Let them fight
 
Most of the people I've met from India or Indian descent have been good people. But this made me laugh.

Pitroda talking about how India is a shining example of democracy in the world, said that the people of the country have "survived 75 years in a very happy environment where people could live together leaving a few fights here and there".
Click to expand...
"We could hold together a country as diverse as India -- where people on East look like Chinese, people on West look like Arab, people on North look like maybe White and people in South look like Africans. It doesn't matter. We are all brothers and sisters," said Pitroda during the interview
Click to expand...
Source - economictimes

I noticed youtube has now added caste discrimination to their hate speech policy which is a shame because "freckled dalit" is one of my favorite insults.
 
balupton said:
As for why India is the way it is, seems to me to stem from the primitiveness of Hinduism. Originally, I had thought it was polytheism to blame, that is the inability to evolve one's personifications of the rules of life into a coherent supreme hierarchy — however, Japan and Ancient Greece/Rome are/were polytheistic, without the issues that India has. Greece naturally evolved into a monotheism. Japan's spirituality is still polytheistic, however unlike India, Japan's theism is not man worshipping gods, but man alongside gods (much like Ancient Greece/Rome). Hinduism's moral relativism prevents its civilisation from reaching domestication; where its communitarianism vehemently defends its ability to maintain deplorability; whereas civilised societies, including communitarian Japan and even east-Indonesia, practice a spirituality that still integrates with the progress of mankind and civilisation to a supreme progressive ideal of mankind's continual refinement. Hinduism on the other hand, is just a "you do you, no matter how depraved, as long as you identify as Hindu, and leave me/us alone".
Click to expand...
Hinduism is very easy to understand: It's the only surviving major religion that believes the world is fair. Whether you're rich or poor, strong or weak, healthy or sick, it's all because of your past life. Karma. (Buddhists believe in karma as well, but they view it very differently.)

To a Hindu, everything is justified because everything is deserved. If you succeeded in scamming, robbing, or raping someone, karma. They deserved it anyway.
 
Which is worse? India or Pakistan? I am of the opinion that both are equally bad and hope both sides mutually nuke each other at the same time.
 
BrunoMattei said:
Which is worse? India or Pakistan? I am of the opinion that both are equally bad and hope both sides mutually nuke each other at the same time.
Click to expand...
Bruno, pajeets come in at least 3 flavors, all of which are distasteful and worthy of being removed whenever spotted in a proper country. All pajeet flavors are rapists and want to invade your country and turn it into another pajeetland. All of them want to force their religion on you. However, there are distinctions between the pajeets that should be understood when crafting racial slurs for them.
  • Indian pajeets: These pajeets are best known for shitting in streets and Hinduism, a barbaric religion of piss and shit. Indians are particularly fond of bestiality of the bovine kind. They are prolific scammers. They have a unique caste system with its own flavors of horrible. Upper caste Indians will try to rule everyone around them and desperately try to recruit as many lower caste Indians as possible at whatever company they work at. Lower caste Indians are the closest thing the real world has to Nurgle worshippers. They truly believe they are human garbage and act like it.
  • Pakistani pajeets: These pajeets are particularly fond of incest at a rate that only a Saudi could compete with. They are so inbred at this point that retardation is all but assured when dealing with one. They are Muslims stuck 1000 years in the past. They are considered defective trash and barbarians in Arab countries, who regularly enslave them as one would put cattle to work; this does nothing to dissuade Pakistanis from taking jobs in gulf states. They are devout pedophiles and will set up child rape gangs in any country they invade. Pakistanis will fuck young goats when children are unavailable. One can only assume they get confused when goats are described as kids. If inter-species breeding were possible, the goats would produce smarter Pakistanis.
  • Bangladeshi pajeets: These are the pajeets of pajeets. Indians think they're poor and pathetic. Pakistanis pretend they don't exist. Bangladeshis are also Muslims, technically. They're about as devout as a C&E Christian. The Bangladeshi flavor was supposed to go extinct to rising sea levels, but they'll probably just all flee to Europe and other nice places. This subspecies is very commonly enslaved by everyone else. When a sweat shop collapses and kills 300 Bangladeshis, the country just goes on as if nothing happened. Safety standards are for countries where human life is more expensive than a new bicycle. In all fairness, they're usually perceived as less awful than the other pajeets. This is simply because even other pajeets would like to pretend they don't exist and are exploiting them already.
Know the pajeet. Beware the pajeet. Remove the pajeet.
 
Audit said:
However, there are distinctions between the pajeets that should be understood when crafting racial slurs for them.
Click to expand...
What about Sikh's? From what I've seen, they're not much different.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom