- Joined
- May 15, 2022
Honestly I think your principles are coming from a good place but you're making the common westerner mistake of not recognizing how theocracies differ from democracies.Because muslims generally stick to their own countries, but when they come over here they can eventually integrate once they see America is better. They do shit up their own space in their country but that's fine if they want to stick to there. Indians don't, they have completely shit up India and overflow everywhere else that's white, and they never ever ever integrate and just try to re-create India elsewhere despite having fled from it.
I'm also aware of how muslim countries are obsessed with terrorism because of Islam, and to that I'd say that what Indians are doing is basically terrorism for business. You can legally shoot a terrorist doing terrorist shit, you can't legally shoot someone at a business.
On the people:
The religion is being used to control a people who are morally extremely indian (wrt scams, laziness, rapes, and other emotionally unstable antisocial behaviour).
If this behaviour is genetic or simply deeply culturally engrained is irrelevant. this is how the vast majority are. this is why america lost afganistan. A democratic middle east without islam would look like india.
All the muslim "cultural contributions" were Persian, not Arab. Once the arabs took over they stole it.
If this behaviour is genetic or simply deeply culturally engrained is irrelevant. this is how the vast majority are. this is why america lost afganistan. A democratic middle east without islam would look like india.
All the muslim "cultural contributions" were Persian, not Arab. Once the arabs took over they stole it.
On theocracies:
They're an existential hazard for democracies, and wrt Islam, every active muslim or cultural islamist is complicit. It's not easy for them to shake it off because it's all the utopianism of communism, but they don't even have to be rewarded in this life.
That this is the best way to control them in their countries is also irrelevant. As soon as they're a noteable part of the population, the utopianism of the religion kicks in, and they collaborate to turn the country they're in into another shithole. See britian/europe.
Some societies function fine without a sincere religion and I will be very happy for arabs when they instate that in their own countries, but they're advocating for their values to be enacted in the West, with the men shitting up online gender dialogue and the women engaging in lib politics. This sort of control is a downgrade for western society.
That this is the best way to control them in their countries is also irrelevant. As soon as they're a noteable part of the population, the utopianism of the religion kicks in, and they collaborate to turn the country they're in into another shithole. See britian/europe.
Some societies function fine without a sincere religion and I will be very happy for arabs when they instate that in their own countries, but they're advocating for their values to be enacted in the West, with the men shitting up online gender dialogue and the women engaging in lib politics. This sort of control is a downgrade for western society.
Sorry for shitting up the india thread with islamposting. feel free to reply to me in the designated thread.