The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I love love love how it's NEVER the shitskin's fault their society is fucked up. It's always whitey and muh colonialism. There's never any self reflection. Because we all know how blaming other people helps you improve.

I was in Germany for a spell and our guide in Koln talked about how one side of the Rhine was developed and the other wasn't due to where Rome had conquered. He said that Rome brought development and technology, but the conquest destroyed local culture. It was a two handed exchange; you can't have one without the other because one was dependent on the other. There wasn't moping or blaming, but looking frankly at the history of the area.

India was given the gift of development but couldn't accept the culture to handle it. May it sink into the sea.
 
There's never any self reflection.
I found the perfect analogy on 4chan of all places:

example.pt2.webp
example.webp

The fact nobody talks about is that not only was every culture saddled with religion from which they drew a great many assumptions, but Charles Darwin wrote 'Origin of the Species' in 1859, (only 150 years ago), so before that we genuinely didn't know whether the primitive races we encountered with their loin clothes and unintelligible jigaboo crap were even human or capable of being civilised at all - let alone human.

Just imagine if we came across a lost island of Neanderthals in the CURRENT YEAR and they were too unintelligent to civilise at all. You gotta draw the line somewhere.

After Darwin, since we realised the relationship between monkeys and humans was a thing, people understandably started to consider other races as some kind of "missing link" intermediary. Not how even Darwin's theory works exactly, but you can still easily wind up with subhuman intelligence that makes you question the boundry between animalistic ape and homo sapiens.

All things considered, anything less than exterminating every single one of the more primitive races, was downright enlightened of us in retrospect. So l'm definitely not going to shed a tear over any misunderstandings - especially when there are races with ridiculously low average IQs who are still barely civilised in the CURRENT YEAR.

We have nothing to feel guilty about, save letting them get away with as much as they have due to our own often misguided benevolence.

I often use this example. Imagine super advanced aliens came to Earth in their high tech spaceship.

They start killing us - like a billion people, but after a time realise we are intelligent life and stop. Then they are like, "Oh shit sorry dude. We didn't know. Here, share all our cool technology, join our Galactic Federation, and let us hang out on your planet in harmony and we'll teach you all the mysteries of the universe and we'll turn your planet into a peaceful prosperous Utopia".

Now you might feel a bit raw about them killing a billion people, especially if that included people you cared about, but you'd still be nuts to turn down that deal - and in a few generations nobody would care - just all an unfortunate, but understandable misunderstanding.

Well that's what already happened to all the non-white races when motherfuckers when Whites showed up in their high-tech ships and gave them technology, but they're still bitching about it.
Fuck them. The only thing stopping us living in peace and harmony in a Star Trek future is these tribal fucks who just wont let it go.
And if they actually built Wakandan Kang nigger tech and came to our shores first, I doubt they would have been as kind.
 
I found the perfect analogy on 4chan of all places:
No that analogy is wrong and actually relys on modern historical revisionism of racial understanding in the past. When the first Aztec and Incan gold and silver was seen by the Spanish the Spanish knew that Aztecs and Incans where men who understod wealth and capable of metal working, they knew they had politics, society and even monarchy. They werent thought of as animals. They were deemed lesser due to not being chrisitans, and then demonised as being mass murdering cannibals to justify their genocide and slavery to take more gold silver and cash crops like chocolate, chilli etc. It was not based on a darwinian understanding of race and evolution or ideas of IQ as the 4chan post says.

That anons post has it backwards, the idea of non-european people not being as evolved as Europeans or being a sub race emerged after Darwins Origin of Species. These imperialists/colonisers were introduced to the idea of evolution and then used that idea to justify the historical and present colonisation of peoples in the past few centuries, they were less evolved as a people or less fit for survival. Hell the Nazi ideology and idea of the master race stemmed from Darwins discovery of evolution. The European colonisers did not become enlightened and realise that people are all equal after being introduced to the idea of evolution and that colonisation was just some big misunderstanding, since colonisation continued long after the Origin of Species was published. It was not a mistake or an accident or some innocent Europeans genuinely believing non europeans to be animals it was purposefully done to enrich themselves and their patron nations and ideological and theological justifications were created afterwards so people at home would be less aganist the genocide of natives. The word cannibal for instance comes from Columbus's demonisations of the Caribs as vicious cannibals, who were so warlike and violent all their women were amazonian warrior women who lived on a seperate island and they only met their men once a year to hand over the boys of age and to breed, because in contact with them for more than a night was too dangerous for them. None of which is true, the Caribs were not cannibals, their women lived alongside them lik everyone else whose not a monk and they were no amazonian warriors who lived on their own island. But the demonisation was so strong that now the word for cannibalism stems from the this demonisation and lie of Carib people.

tl:dr That 4chan post is completely fucking wrong and has everything backwards.
I love love love how it's NEVER the shitskin's fault their society is fucked up. It's always whitey and muh colonialism. There's never any self reflection. Because we all know how blaming other people helps you improve.
This is a consequance of a caste system where your ruling elites truly beleive they are better than everyone else around them biologically, why would you self reflect when the only conclusion is that that isn't true and massively hurt your inflated ego. colonisalism did harm India but thats used as an excuse to ignore their own problems with Indian cultural attitudes and mindset
 
No that analogy is wrong and actually relys on modern historical revisionism of racial understanding in the past.
Jeets did nothing and invented nothing for 5,000+ years, and even jeets admit the only time things were running smoothly in India was the 100 years under british rule. Everything technology wise jeets have was created by white people and they made copies of it. White people were willing to give them it all for free and brown people have done nothing except abuse it and use our own technology to run tech scams and export shitty H1B workers. The alien analogy is flawless.
 
So despite India overflowing with resources, land, and people. They still got BTFO'd by a private company from a nation that is 100th their seize and from half way across the world. No matter how you look at it Jeets come off as pathetic bug people that still can't recover from how much the Anglos ass fucked them.

Well, the Brits missed a good ol' trick if they failed to help themselves to way over $1trillion in treasure in the vault of a temple in India that is literally covered in gold.

 
They were deemed lesser due to not being chrisitans, and then demonised as being mass murdering cannibals to justify their genocide and slavery to take more gold silver and cash crops like chocolate, chilli etc. It was not based on a darwinian understanding of race and evolution or ideas of IQ as the 4chan post says.
But they are lesser.
 
They were deemed lesser due to not being chrisitans, and then demonised as being mass murdering cannibals to justify their genocide and slavery to take more gold silver and cash crops like chocolate, chilli etc. It was not based on a darwinian understanding of race and evolution or ideas of IQ as the 4chan post says.
Groups of lesser intelligence produce lesser cultures as a result, as evidenced by the native cultures of East Asians and Jews, probably the most intelligent minority groups on average, being far less anathema to Western values than others like the subcontinent. These two things are inextricable and there is no use trying to separate them, doing so for the sake of some sort of postmodernism or utopian egalitarianism only creates problems. It doesn't really matter if the judgement is made based on an enlightened rational IQ score perspective or a theocratic behaviorist moralist one, the end result is always the same.
 
pajeet weird 1.webp
Whenever a jeet nationalist boats about Indians "invading" and "taking over" white countries out of revenge, he is basically admitting that his miserable shithole is completely non-functional on its own and his countrymen cannot survive in their own lands without the presence and assistance of the white man. Hindutvas hate the white man and blame him for every one of India's ills all the while flocking to the white man's lands, even in non-anglosphere nations, when they have the opportunity to do so. I guess you could say that pajeets who think like this are the ultimate white supremacists.


pajeet weird.webp
So you're going to attack some innocent Irish leftie on holiday who did nothing wrong and destroy their naive belief that India is some holy land of enlightenment instead of an unsanitary, unsafe, and misogynistic shithole? Way to make them peak pajeet callmembrou.

Creepy Indian men already commit horrific crimes against foreign tourists like Irish ones in their country. Indian men also sexually harass, rape, and even murder female tourists in India. One such victim was an Irish woman from Donegal named Danielle McLaughlin.
 
India was around 23% of the world's population when it accounted for 23% of the world's economy (about 27% of the world's population according to professor GPT). The Industrial revolution wasn't fuelled by India, and any assets that India would have had, would likely have garnered from elsewhere. A common example of this is cotton from the southern states, and why the confederacy thought they'd have a chance of gaining European support. What did Britain do? They just used Egyptian cotton instead.

Now, Britain had good reason as to why they did not invest into India and would instead bring wealth over from India to Britain (which did occur). This is because of a little thing called rebellions which were quite a common occurrence in colonial India. The most well known one being the Sepoy Mutiny in 1857 which led to the nationalisation of EIC assets with India being brought under direct control through the establishment of the Raj.

There's also a certain joy about the Indo-centrism of the "23% claim" because it presumes that it was just India that made Britain rich. This is natural from a highly nationalist country that was colonized. We can see this phenomena elsewhere where it is the belief of exploitation that is why X is better than Y. I gave the example of Egyptian cotton earlier, and Egypt was an area that got a lot of British investment for this reason. The Middle East was another area of interest because of Oil. And then there's Malaysia with rubber. All of these being stuff not generated from India. At the end of the day, Indian nationalist mythos are reductive and are essentially saying "Britain is why India is poor, it was India that carried the British Empire" and for all the anti-colonial rhetoric, and cries of Eurocentrism it is effectively doing the same with India.

Of course, this didn't stop British Imperial Policy from building factories in India. During WW1 imperial logistics were basically rethought because the Kaiser's U-boat flotilla and submarine warfare which made it more effective and the entire empire was mobilized. Things like steel production became critical with India. If colonial practice was to make India poor, the left over WW2 era bombers would have been used to carpet bomb India, they weren't. Britain could have also engineered famines for this to make it so India's population was physically less able (no food, no energy. The tallest and biggest would starve, leaving a smaller population with less physical prowess). This again, didn't happen.

British Imperial policy was primarily centred around trade, which is why the British Empire has often been referred to as an accident. Britain did not set out to conquer the world, and Empire was really expensive and didn't really pay itself off.
 
Whenever a jeet nationalist boats about Indians "invading" and "taking over" white countries out of revenge, he is basically admitting that his miserable shithole is completely non-functional on its own and his countrymen cannot survive in their own lands without the presence and assistance of the white man. Hindutvas hate the white man and blame him for every one of India's ills all the while flocking to the white man's lands, even in non-anglosphere nations, when they have the opportunity to do so. I guess you could say that pajeets who think like this are the ultimate white supremacists.
Poojeets and niggers will never forgive the fact that some White people forced them to learn how to eat with a knife and fork and how to run a semi-functional society, as well as forbidding them from doing weird shit like having literal voodoo juju robber/murderer cults and treating their women worse than a piece of gum stuck under a shoe.

The thing is, as I've said and claim and should write a fucking book on, narcissism is to blame. The way the West has been enshittified can easily be explained by the fact that all of our major institutions have been captured by narcissists, sociopaths, or people who straight up have the dark triad. India is the example of collective narcissism, other ethnic groups that are known for their arrogance like Arabs, Maghrebis and Turks (notice a pattern) pale in comparison to the amount of unearned confidence and insanely overblown delusions of grandeur of the average jeet.

If there weren't examples of ethnic groups who have uplifted themselves from absolute poverty into at least decent places to live, if not places of very high development, they'd at least have a point. South Korea used to be an agrarian shithole that made India seem developed just 70 years ago, fucking look at them now. Same with Singapore. Certain countries in eastern Europe are an example of at least being able to turn into half-decent places to live. I mentioned it way earlier in the thread but my dad didn't even have an indoor toilet in his youth, they had to use an outhouse. At that time, commieblocks at least had a flushing toilet, hell some even had bidets. That's how fucking impoverished the part of the country I'm from was when my dad was a kid. Keep in mind, most ex-communist countries in Europe are still corrupt to the fucking core which hampers our development but India is so fucking bad and jeets are so monumentally stupid that they effectively haven't moved an inch when it comes to development ever since the bloody basterd Britishers left them to their own devices. Well, I guess they developed some novel scamming techniques.

When undeniable reality hits a narcissist in their face and it shatters their false narcissistic self, which is the omnipotent image they've created of themselves to cope with being failures, then they suffer narcissistic injury. After narcissistic injury comes narcissistic rage, as seen in many disgusting comments that jeets leave about virtually every other country on Earth.
 
Every single country will have to take 190,722 Indian males just to stabilise their population while filling our borders to the brim with nondescript brown biomass. And our overlords will hold open the gates for the foul-smelling apes to worm their way in, like a turmeric-stained hand groping under your clothes on a crowded train.
190,722 per country? Hmmm. I have a thought. It definitely involves trains, you mentioned Eastern Europe. See where I’m going with this?
 
Just have the excess Indian males become MTFs and date each other, since pro-immigration liberals believe transwomen are real women, right? Get them addicted to tranny porn and to become prison gay for each other, all while staying in India.
 
Just have the excess Indian males become MTFs and date each other, since pro-immigration liberals believe transwomen are real women, right? Get them addicted to tranny porn and to become prison gay for each other, all while staying in India.
So you’re suggesting that insufferable pajeets troon out creating more insufferable trannies in the process? Tranny jeets? Well it’s not the worst idea in the world considering that the problem has a 41% chance of resolving itself.
 
Just have the excess Indian males become MTFs and date each other, since pro-immigration liberals believe transwomen are real women, right? Get them addicted to tranny porn and to become prison gay for each other, all while staying in India.
Their sexuality is so fucked up from a genetic standpoint that I don't think them getting addicted to porn or becoming trannies would make them act any differently.

I think there is a segment on Codex Pajeet that talks about it, imagine how fucked up your genes must be to find pajeetas or pajeets desireable in any way, shape or form, no wonder they also fuck animals.
 
Back
Top Bottom