it is really funny to see holocaust fabulists become obscuritanists. "noooooo you see the only proof for the most documented mass murder in history is half of a single burnt page of a book that is buried under 100 tons of concrete beneath bergen belsen. here is a picture of a picture of the untranslated montenegran description of a frenchman reading what he remembers the page said! deniers btfo"
Hah more like documents like https://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2019/11/report-to-hitler-jews-executed-363211.html
Hey look you dig up something we've discussed and shown wrong 50 times before. Why don't you bring something new to the table besides your blog?
Remind me, were the documents forged? Himmler was making stuff up?
Would you be able to tell the difference? How do you know what's real and what's not? We know you are unable to possess the intelligence to figure it out for yourself, so why should we take your word it's not? I've posted multiple documents you refuse to respond to because they haven't been covered on your blog before. So why should we even bother responding to you? So again where are those stockpiles? Why hasn't your blog covered that before? Is it because it refutes all your work you've done for years with nothing to show for it?
Which ones, LOL
Yep, no other reasons to discuss history and mock foolish ideas than paid jidf agent
Actually I just wanted to troll you. I still believe its nothing more than a hoax to gain power from.....and I thought the JIDF would defend the holocaust, not deny it....
It's possible the quote unquote revisionists on this board are jidf agents, paid to make the movement look bad. But I don't believe this
...Why would an organization (that's probably dead anyways) pay agents to make themselves look bad?
To discredit Holocaust deniers
He doesn't understand what "moving the Overton window" means, nor controlled opposition.
If you're an expert in controlled opposition, which revisionists are controlled opposition?
Any of them that claim the holocaust happened but it was "definitely more like 1 million instead of 6 million"
Bold statement man. You would say 100 thousand Jews died, maybe fifty thousand? Considering many millions of Soviet civilians died, it would seem keeping Jews alive was a major policy goal for the Nazis. Interesting.
If you start from the bottom and work your way up there's basically no proof of any genocide as I've shown. Infact, you've shown that everyone who pushes the holocaust is so fundamentally dishonest that you can't believe anything anyone has said about it. So until someone shows me otherwise (they cant) I don't believe anyone was killed in the holocaust. The Wansee conference shows a top down order of expulsion, which is supported at every level. So again until you can show me the bodies, no jews were killed.
Out of curiosity, how many of the interned Soviet pows do you think died in German hands?
"But whatabout"
I mean if you don't want to give the answer, it is about half or 3 million, mostly in 41 and 42. Yet you believe a much smaller portion of Jews held died, during this period. Not 50% but, 1 or 2% maybe. Anyone spouting a death figure which would be a reasonable incidental for the whole war including the end where logistic system failed, eg 1 million deaths (10 -15%) is automatically controlled opp