The Holocaust Thread - The Great Debate Between Affirmers, Revisionists and Deniers

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Logically, if you wanted to hide that you "illegally" killed millions of people while also actually killing millions of people in active combat you would just throw their bodies in with the other mass graves you had for this purpose.

You wouldn't need to waste your time with any cremation nonsense to "hide your crime." Soldier mass graves are sometimes marked and rarely dug up. Especially on the Eastern Front.

But no that makes too much sense. Much like the idea that it was somehow more efficient and logical to have German soldiers go to the ends of the realm to hunt down Jews and transport them somewhere just so they could kill them. Rather than just killing them when they found them.
 
Chugger said:
Why isn't the number important? If it's 2x less efficient (this would be my guestimate, this is a lot different than 10x, 20x, etc.
Click to expand...
You quoted the reason why the number isn't important. We already determined the lower bound, the absolute minimum energy needed. You could not show that the fuel required to produce this very low number was present.

So, when you then try to bring up a process which is less efficient, it increases the number you already failed to show. It does not matter how by how much the number increased, because you already failed.
 
Biden's Chosen said:
this is a really hateful thread. Imagine such a life.
Click to expand...
images.png
 
Don’t understand Westoid Nazi Holocaust denial. Think I prefer the eastern attitude to it. It did happen and here’s why that’s a good thing :)
 
John.Doe said:
You quoted the reason why the number isn't important. We already determined the lower bound, the absolute minimum energy needed. You could not show that the fuel required to produce this very low number was present.

So, when you then try to bring up a process which is less efficient, it increases the number you already failed to show. It does not matter how by how much the number increased, because you already failed.
Click to expand...

Again, if you just threw them into pits and buried them you wouldn't have to explain anything. The Germans killed thousands of Soviet prisoners at Auschwitz as well... by shooting them.

You can even read it in Jewpedia. For all the millions of Soviets they killed even in the camps. Mass graves were good enough. Only Jews got magical treatment to make sure nobody could find any bodies or evidence.


Nothing about it makes sense.
 
TJT said:
You can even read it in Jewpedia. For all the millions of Soviets they killed even in the camps. Mass graves were good enough. Only Jews got magical treatment to make sure nobody could find any bodies or evidence.
Click to expand...
Funny you say that considering what wikipedia has to say:

Although the Soviet Union announced the death penalty for surrender early in the war, most former prisoners were reintegrated into Soviet society.
Click to expand...

The Soviets annouce a no quarter policy but somehow it's the Nazis fault.
 
John.Doe said:
You quoted the reason why the number isn't important. We already determined the lower bound, the absolute minimum energy needed. You could not show that the fuel required to produce this very low number was present.

So, when you then try to bring up a process which is less efficient, it increases the number you already failed to show. It does not matter how by how much the number increased, because you already failed.
Click to expand...
So if I understand you correctly, even if we use the results of open air burnings from 1904 as the basis for establishing fuel needed to destroy the Reinhard camp bodies, (which would be a few million gallons equivalent), it's still impossible because there aren't records of such fuel deliveries. The logic is, that without records of fuel deliveries, there's no way that fuel could have ever been delivered.
 
Is this the argument that the lack of evidence is in itself the evidence? What a Jew concept that is.

Nazi Germany kept records to an absurd and almost comical level. Of everything. Except the things you would need to prove what you want beyond a shadow of a doubt. Because they only destroyed those ones.
 
TJT said:
Is this the argument that the lack of evidence is in itself the evidence? What a Jew concept that is.

Nazi Germany kept records to an absurd and almost comical level. Of everything. Except the things you would need to prove what you want beyond a shadow of a doubt. Because they only destroyed those ones.
Click to expand...
No of course not, I'm just trying to understand John Doe's argument.

But out of curiosity, what do you make of the total absence of any records of the millions of Jews that were sent to the Reinhardt camps and subsequently disappeared?
 
Chugger said:
So if I understand you correctly, even if we use the results of open air burnings from 1904 as the basis for establishing fuel needed to destroy the Reinhard camp bodies
Click to expand...
Why couldn't you use local studies to determine what was done there? Is it because none were ever done for political reasons? Why would that be?
Chugger said:
it's still impossible because there aren't records of such fuel deliveries. The logic is, that without records of fuel deliveries, there's no way that fuel could have ever been delivered.
Click to expand...
Or you could study the location to determine exactly what happened, instead of relying on second and third hand info. Why is the holocaust the only field of study that refuses to use primary physical evidence and instead looks for the least reliable points of information? Is it because you know you can't find what you are looking for?
Chugger said:
But out of curiosity, what do you make of the total absence of any records of the millions of Jews that were sent to the Reinhardt camps and subsequently disappeared?
Click to expand...
Guys why didnt the Soviets keep the records that would exonerate the Nazis?

Why do you loop through the same 3 or 4 easily refuted arguments with nothing to add? Why does it take me seconds to ruin the holocaust? Why am I so much smarter than you and the people that have made billions of dollars? I thought jews were smart?
 
Bonesjones said:
Guys why didnt the Soviets keep the records that would exonerate the Nazis?

Why do you loop through the same 3 or 4 easily refuted arguments with nothing to add? Why does it take me seconds to ruin the holocaust? Why am I so much smarter than you and the people that have made billions of dollars? I thought jews were smart?
Click to expand...
It's not "easily refuted" to say the Soviets destroyed 100% of records the Nazis kept. Maybe they did but you're just speculating on this point. It's not easy to do. They weren't even able to destroy all the records of their own crimes LOL

eg we know from their own documents that Soviets did Katyn, ethnically cleansed vast areas, did mass killings during the 30s
 
Chugger said:
It's not "easily refuted" to say the Soviets destroyed 100% of records the Nazis kept. Maybe they did but you're just speculating on this point. It's not easy to do. They weren't even able to destroy all the records of their own crimes LOL
Click to expand...
No one said 100% you fucking idiot. If we have incoming train records and no outgoing, then we know they were destroyed. Since that's how train records work. You are just doing another one of your lame brained deflections since you keep losing the same arguments over and over again. You are literally a schizophrenic retard.
 
Bonesjones said:
No one said 100% you fucking idiot. If we have incoming train records and no outgoing, then we know they were destroyed. Since that's how train records work. You are just doing another one of your lame brained deflections since you keep losing the same arguments over and over again. You are literally a schizophrenic retard.
Click to expand...
There are outgoing records from the Reinhardt camps. The trains came back, marked empty.
 
Nobody hates Nazis more than Russians. Dumbass Jews certainly don't. This really goes without saying and if you have to explain it then it isn't worth discussing.

Even in2024. Putin and Russia at large wont entertain Nazisim in any way. They don't give a shit about lolcaust because 20M+ Soviets actually did die in the war.
 
Bonesjones said:
View attachment 6090137
Click to expand...
Armor of God said:
You're on KF just like the rest of us, in case you hadn't noticed.
Click to expand...
I found the idea of someone saying "I hope you stub your toe every time you enter a room" a really funny curse to wish on someone and tried to call attention to how colorful and mild it is by exaggerating how bad a life of stubbing your toe all the time would be.

I thought I put in a strong punchline, but maybe like the holocaust it was bigger in my mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom