The Holocaust Thread - The Great Debate Between Affirmers, Revisionists and Deniers

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm talking about their assertion that the gas chamber is "fake". Even a gas chamber intended for delousing clothes is still real. It would be fake if it was specifically designed to deceive people into thinking it had a homicidal function.
Then why do you buy into this politically correct narrative of the holocaust then?
 
A fake gas chamber is not implied by what I wrote. A gas chamber, even assuming it was not used for killing, is still a real gas chamber. Is this the distinction you're failing to grasp?
They were converting other rooms into morgues, so they were already dealing with a death load they couldn't handle. So why would they need to kill more people faster? If they are using it to delouse clothing it's not a death chamber, we are arguing about genocide retard. Keep your story straight.
I'm talking about their assertion that the gas chamber is "fake". Even a gas chamber intended for delousing clothes is still real. It would be fake if it was specifically designed to deceive people into thinking it had a homicidal function.
No it's not it's a delousing chamber built for an entirely different purpose. It's like calling a kitchen oven a murder machine or a pottery kiln a crematorium. You are only doing so to muddy the waters of discussion. Which is why you insist on your line of thought no matter how stupid it is. So is it a real or fake gas chamber? If it's real who built it and for what purpose? If it's fake who built it and for what purpose? You can't answer any of these questions because you have no rational train of thoughtm
 
They were converting other rooms into morgues, so they were already dealing with a death load they couldn't handle. So why would they need to kill more people faster? If they are using it to delouse clothing it's not a death chamber, we are arguing about genocide retard. Keep your story straight.

No it's not it's a delousing chamber built for an entirely different purpose. It's like calling a kitchen oven a murder machine or a pottery kiln a crematorium. You are only doing so to muddy the waters of discussion. Which is why you insist on your line of thought no matter how stupid it is. So is it a real or fake gas chamber? If it's real who built it and for what purpose? If it's fake who built it and for what purpose? You can't answer any of these questions because you have no rational train of thoughtm
Assuming what you're saying about it is true, it's not a "fake" gas chamber, it's a room that was wrongly asserted to be a gas chamber. These two things are not the same.
Then why do you buy into this politically correct narrative of the holocaust then?
It didn't seem from your previous response that you're really interested in this question, and your mind is all over the place tbh. We're discussing a minute detail here, due to Tall Man and Bonesjones myopia.
 
Assuming what you're saying about it is true, it's not a "fake" gas chamber, it's a room that was wrongly asserted to be a gas chamber. These two things are not the same.
Pretending to be retarded when you are actually retarded, doesn't work out. Stop trying to argue semantics and definitions instead of failing to assert your points.
It didn't seem from your previous response that you're really interested in this question, and your mind is all over the place tbh. We're discussing a minute detail here, due to Tall Man and Bonesjones myopia.
Trying the "I'm rubber, you're glue" argument isn't going to work put for you either.
 
Pretending to be retarded when you are actually retarded, doesn't work out. Stop trying to argue semantics and definitions instead of failing to assert your points.
Got it. You think building a fake gas chamber and calling an innocuous room a gas chamber is the same thing.
 
So in detail explain the difference. Use whatever sources you want.
No sources necessary, only basic english skills. The word "Building" for instance. When used in the context of physical locations, architecture, rooms, this word means the physical act of creation. Calling something a gas chamber requires no physical intervention. If they put in fake pipes or something like that would be a different story.
 
No sources necessary, only basic english skills. The word "Building" for instance. When used in the context of physical locations, architecture, rooms, this word means the physical act of creation. Calling something a gas chamber requires no physical intervention. If they put in fake pipes or something like that would be a different story.
Hey look a bunch of meaningless words, try being not a retarded nigger.
 
Hey look a bunch of meaningless words, try being not a retarded nigger.
Ok then you explain to me the difference between "building a fake gas chamber and calling an innocuous room a gas chamber". Only semantic differences between these two things? Why use the word "build"?
 
1717308468033.png
 
Nah I think you got nothin or are delusional
Pretending previously linked material directly from the stupid jew official holocaust website doesn't exist. All because you refuse to go back a whole 3 pages and 2 mouse clicks. Then thinking that this is a reasonable way to refute an argument is the most Jew thing you have ever done. At least of the comments I have read from you.

Bravo.
 
Pretending previously linked material directly from the stupid jew official holocaust website doesn't exist. All because you refuse to go back a whole 3 pages and 2 mouse clicks. Then thinking that this is a reasonable way to refute an argument is the most Jew thing you have ever done. At least of the comments I have read from you.

Bravo.
There's nothing back there, 3 pages or anywhere. Even Mattogno doesn't believe that a " fake gas chamber was built". You guys hallucinate worse than a shitty AI.
 
Back
Top Bottom