The Holocaust Thread - The Great Debate Between Affirmers, Revisionists and Deniers

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
There are numerous examples of the Nazis using "resettlement" as a code word for murder (I posted one above). Of course the code word "resettlement" still bears a literal meaning, so we cannot assume it always means killing if it is used in a Nazi document.

But if the Nazis say that they have "resettled to the Russian East" the millions of Jews sent to the Reinhardt camps - yet there is no (infrastructural, communicative, or testimonial) evidence of these purported resettlements of millions of Jews, and all the witnesses (and various other documents, e.g. the Stroop Report) state explicitly that they were killed - it is much more plausible that they were using the term in the established code-word sense, i.e. meaning to kill.

Zo, do you deny that "resettlement" was at least sometimes used as a code word for killing by the Nazis? If so I can share other documents.
 
Last edited:
The holocaust didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not Hitler's fault.
And if it was, Hitler didn't mean it.
And if Hitler did, the Jews deserved it.

I'm not reading almost two-hundred pages of this shit so I'm hoping this hasn't been posted already.
 
Mrolonzo,

1. What problem does Codoh and you have with the numbers given by Kues and HC blog? I thought the koeherr report was good evidence. What number do you think it is?

2. Dude just tell me the name of this settlement or send me a picture of Mattogno’s book

3. What the hell makes you think “Almost all of my possessions and money I had was stolen, and I had my entire life changed by a forced movement into a land I know nothing about!” isn’t newsworthy??? I can find a bunch of witnesses talking about Japanese Internment, the Partition, the removal of Mexicans from USA, yet I can’t find any for these Jews sent eastward.

Plus, we are talking about Jews, a group that, in your own words, “claims to be a persecuted minority” consistently. Of course these Jews would jump on the opportunity to talk about this event until they die.

“Getting deported and robbed of your possessions and money is so normal why would anyone complain???”

Insightful and ingenious commentary, mrolonzo. We got an Einstein in the making.
 
Last edited:
I can find a bunch of witnesses talking about Japanese Internment, the Partition, the removal of Mexicans from USA, yet I can’t find any for these Jews sent eastward.

Plus, we are talking about Jews, a group that, in your own words, “claims to be a persecuted minority” consistently. Of course these Jews would jump on the opportunity to talk about this event until they die.
mrolonzo is going to squirm and execute every escape move he knows to get out of this question, but ultimately he won't be able to answer it

i think he can say the USSR could have destroyed all German documentary evidence of resettlement, which may have been millions of documents. they would have needed a veritable army of document destroyers to get every single one before they were discovered but I suppose it would be possible, if they were extremely lucky. but the thing about the silenced witnesses is unresolvable, or would require some form of technology yet unknown to man
 
Last edited:
mrolonzo is going to squirm and execute every escape move he knows to get out of this question, but ultimately he won't be able to answer it

i think he can say the USSR could have destroyed all German documentary evidence of resettlement, which may have been millions of documents. they would have needed a veritable army of document destroyers to get every single one but I suppose it would be possible, if they were extremely lucky. but the thing about the silenced witnesses is unresolvable, or would require some form of technology yet unknown to man
They would not just have to destroy all Nazi documents, but all traces buildings, pictures, and economic records (including any records from foreign individuals, businesses, and banks who did business with this community of millions of "resettled" Jews), and newspaper records, and somehow coerce all of millions of resettled people and witnesses into silence (not only never talking, but never writing diaries or taking photos).
 
lolfaggot.PNG

Lmao, so History Speaks is a fat mystery meat neckbeard who calls anyone that questions the narrative a flat earther. Now I know why this thread sucks ass.
There needs to be some kinda disclaimer. @History Speaks go back to playing video games, niggerfaggot.
 
mrolonzo is going to squirm and execute every escape move he knows to get out of this question, but ultimately he won't be able to answer it
He has fallen so low has to unironically say

Why would it be a big thing to say "I was not murdered!”

He unironically thinks a massive deportation to a land which the Jews know basically nothing about, which includes the robbery of all the money and basically all of their possessions, is just your average Tuesday.
 
We should also remember that 15 million German and Italian forces served on the Eastern front, most of whom ended up living outside the iron curtain. How was their silence ensured? What about after the USSR collapsed?

He unironically thinks a massive deportation to a land which the Jews know basically nothing about, which includes the robbery of all the money and basically all of their possessions, is just your average Tuesday.

"blown to the wind" . yet we know all about the 100k Jews resettled by the Romanians in transnistria

I'll repeat from my post here which was never responded to :

we can look again at the resettlement of Jews in the of Transnistria as a reasonable control sample for what we might expect to see in German held USSR

Rapechu discovered that in addition to undoubtedly thousands of documents, oral histories (collections of witness statements) exist which give us a picture of what life was like on a near microscopic level. We have the ghetto of dzhurin for example, or Shargarod, a ghetto of 7000, which a historian recently covered in pretty good detail

even settlements so small that their population wasn't recorded in censuses taken by the government are evidenced in witness testimony

Rapechu found this one

My older brother Shmil remained in the camp. To his wife managed to escape and get to Mogilev, and he with two children stayed in the camp. He does not have money or valuables for ransom was, and yet, promising to pay at the place of arrival, he managed persuade the guide and, together with other prisoners, got out with two babies in her arms from the camp. It was in winter, almost Without clothing. First one child freezes, the ground is frozen, it is impossible to bury, everyone is urged to move faster, Shmil leaves the child right in the forest. All behind the first the second child freezes. The same story. Reaching Mogilev, Shmil learns that his wife and son were taken to camp Ananiev, which is near Odessa. After liberation, they met in Mogilev, having lost two children frozen. Riva until her release she remained in Dzigovka. Pesya survived spent the whole war underground in the village of Kapisterna near relatives of the husband. Until my release, I remained in in the Mogilev ghetto, wandered, slept where necessary. Mama not allowed to come to the hospital, only tried to get and brought me food.
-Maurice Bronstein "Loop"
It turns out that people (and maybe Jews especially) talk about what happened to them in great detail.

We can step back and see the Jewish population of Transnistria was around 80,000 in 1942. Again, their existence is evidenced in near-microscopic detail in terms of witness testimony

The number of deported Jews for which no record exists of being alive somewhere is between 2-4 million.

How does something like this happen? Walk me through it. No evidence is necessary, your imagination is fine.
 
It turns out that people (and maybe Jews especially) talk about what happened to them in great detail.
It reminds me of this book passage I came across:
My sister, Chane, was taken from me and dragged to a rocket with the rest of the women and many of the children. I too, should have been placed with the other children, but the Hauptsturmführer grasped my arm and declared I was fit to labor with a young man's strength. I had to watch through tears as the rocket turned winter into summer, for the moments of its flight from the frozen ground into the sky. I was gripped with fear, thinking my sister would explode like a firework, taking her from me like the bombs took our parents. Instead, it vanished into the night on a tail of foul smelling smoke, lost among the stars like a seed on a sand bar. I begged the soldier to tell me where my sister had gone, and he laughed. To the moon she went, he said, to grow Moon Pears in honor of Hitler. As for me, my path went to a labor camp......
- Schmul Goldberg "Lonely"

That wacky Hitler had some pretty out of this world ideas, am I right?
 
View attachment 3608700
Lmao, so History Speaks is a fat mystery meat neckbeard who calls anyone that questions the narrative a flat earther. Now I know why this thread sucks ass.
There needs to be some kinda disclaimer. @History Speaks go back to playing video games, niggerfaggot.
The first 20 pages or so were pretty good.

Before this thread attracted single issue posters.
Aren't you purportedly an academic? How do you not understand basic reasoning and logic? They should have taught you that in Hebrew school at least.
North african and middle eastern academics aren't of the same caliber as our western tranny academics.

Imagine not even being at least on the intellectual level of tranny academics.
 
The holocaust didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not Hitler's fault.
And if it was, Hitler didn't mean it.
And if Hitler did, the Jews deserved it.

I'm not reading almost two-hundred pages of this shit so I'm hoping this hasn't been posted already.
The funniest part of this is that if you replace Jews with slavs, you have the Jewish attitude towards slavs (and pretty much everyone else) who also supposedly were killed in the Holocaust.
 
View attachment 3608700
Lmao, so History Speaks is a fat mystery meat neckbeard who calls anyone that questions the narrative a flat earther. Now I know why this thread sucks ass.
There needs to be some kinda disclaimer. @History Speaks go back to playing video games, niggerfaggot.
Matthew Ghobrial Cockerill / History Speaks is half Coptic Egyptian and half British. I think the poopskin DNA is from his father, but it might well be from his mother; if so she's not much better as a Brit spreading for a savage. Cockerill is working on a postgrad degree in Germany. He's chosen the lucrative career path of calling white people racists, the people whose countries defeated Germany in WWII, the same countries that shelter demographics oppressed by Islam (like Coptics). He doesn't realize he's sawing the limb he's clinging to to win woke points with the Muslims cutting down the tree. He's a traitor to the countries that shelter him. He's a Brit especially in that he's a turncoat. He's not here out of the kindness of his heart; he's here to build his brand. He's standing on the Shoah and isn't even Jewish, just to make his name and bank account balance great.
The first 20 pages or so were pretty good.

Before this thread attracted single issue posters.
I have the courtesy to not shit up the thread about my single issue: that white people need policed for their view of the Holocaust far, far less than Muslims do, and that Cockerill refuses to work in the exponentially riper fields of Muslim anti-Semitism. I think my single issue is a cogent one, but I at least stick to stickers mostly.
 
Matthew Ghobrial Cockerill / History Speaks is half Coptic Egyptian and half British. I think the poopskin DNA is from his father, but it might well be from his mother; if so she's not much better as a Brit spreading for a savage. Cockerill is working on a postgrad degree in Germany. He's chosen the lucrative career path of calling white people racists, the people whose countries defeated Germany in WWII, the same countries that shelter demographics oppressed by Islam (like Coptics). He doesn't realize he's sawing the limb he's clinging to to win woke points with the Muslims cutting down the tree. He's a traitor to the countries that shelter him. He's a Brit especially in that he's a turncoat. He's not here out of the kindness of his heart; he's here to build his brand. He's standing on the Shoah and isn't even Jewish, just to make his name and bank account balance great.

I have the courtesy to not shit up the thread about my single issue: that white people need policed for their view of the Holocaust far, far less than Muslims do, and that Cockerill refuses to work in the exponentially riper fields of Muslim anti-Semitism. I think my single issue is a cogent one, but I at least stick to stickers mostly.
You know, you bring up a good point.

HistorySpeaks, why don’t you ever talk with Muslims on the holocaust? There are way more Muslims deniers than Whites, are there not?
 
The first 20 pages or so were pretty good.

Before this thread attracted single issue posters.
you mean before this thread attracted posters with in-depth knowledge

That wacky Hitler had some pretty out of this world ideas, am I right?
not so wacky actually. they successfully launched a rocket into space in 1944

you should bring you witness testimonies and photographs to Codoh and see what they think of your moon resettlement theory, the first well-evidenced explanation by a revisionist for what happened to the deported Jews
 
Are you suggesting that if a Muslim denier shows up in this thread, I will refuse to contradict or disagree with him? This is a crazy theory my stalker has come up with (Ides of March guy), but it is pure invention on his part.
You just demonstrated that you will not talk about Muslims. What need is there for a "crazy theory" when we can see you refuse to talk about Muslims, every time. You won't discuss the cultural and religious based anti-Semitism found in Muslims. You won't give figures of Holocaust acceptance across demographics. You're a turncoat and a coward, preferring to unite with Muslims who persecuted your family rather than the non-Muslims who took them in. Traitors will face the wall too, fatty.
You know, you bring up a good point.

HistorySpeaks, why don’t you ever talk with Muslims on the holocaust? There are way more Muslims deniers than Whites, are there not?
It is a good point, thank you. But Cockerill won't answer that point no matter who asks him. He only castigates white people. Such a racist bias disqualifies him from handling history. He's no more than a race grifter.
 
It reminds me of this book passage I came across:


That wacky Hitler had some pretty out of this world ideas, am I right?
Did you make this quote entirely by yourself? I love it. It even has the little nickname on the bottom like Chuggers.
 
Back
Top Bottom