The Holocaust Thread - The Great Debate Between Affirmers, Revisionists and Deniers

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I have to ask you neo-nazis, which of the massacred Minsk Jews (whose massacre Mattogno acknowledges) do you think gave your heroes the fiercest resistance? The 8 year olds, the grandmothers, or the paraplegics?
 
Mrolonzo is really hamstrung here by his 'mattogno is god/ nazis went out of their way to protect jews position

I'll repost the doc for convenience

1659292169290.png
 
mrolonzo said:
Why would anyone go to the trouble of making things up about this woman and how could you have the moral stance that doing so is just 'being wrong'. ?

I don't need to write emails thus. What do you think our memes and truth posting is about?
Click to expand...
Who "made up" anything? She was accused of having lampshades made of human skin by witnesses, and found not guilty.

This has nothing to do with "morality."

Person was accused of things.
Person was ultimately found not guilty .
Further evidence shows person couldn't have done it in the first place, since the evidence proving guilt was wrong.

This is just the law at work. Nothing here is "morality" it's just how courts work. Person gets accused of things for varying reasons, such as witnesses claiming person did something evil, but is then found guilty or not guilty.

Now replace "person" with Ilse Koch.
 
Last edited:
Chugger said:
just text search "even in their brutality"


I'll repost the page since it's a clear checkmate for Mattogno stans (in that he doesn't question the authenticity of the document or that it refers to killing-very dumb of him)

View attachment 3548633

and the part of the document he left out--more dishonesty/stupidity

report continues, with Mattogno omitting an important line (different translation here)

The Extermination of Jews and the Fight Against the Partisans in Byelorussia​

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.
www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org
Click to expand...

Oh ok, is this about killing partisans? Because I don't think revisionists dispute such actions. And doesn't it confirm Jews being resettled in the east?

What are you saying here?
 
mrolonzo said:
Oh ok, is this about killing partisans?
Click to expand...
Do you even read your Mattogno? The document he cites mentions the massacre of children and elderly at Minsk.

Mattogno's pathetic cope is that the motivation for this was anti-partisan (perhaps he would argue it was a "reprisal"), but he does not deny the massacre of these children.
 
History Speaks said:
Do you even read your Mattogno? The document he cites mentions the massacre of children and elderly at Minsk.

Mattogno's pathetic cope is that the motivation for this was anti-partisan (perhaps he would argue it was a "reprisal"), but he does not deny the massacre of these children.
Click to expand...

Do you mean like babies? Toddlers?

Pretty sure babies and toddlers are no threat dude.
 
Chugger said:
partisan supporters, and future partisan supporters like children. Eventually every jew in Belarus



You should read some orthodox history, will clarify some things. The HC blog pdf is the quickest route "nazi policy" chapter
Click to expand...

So partisans? Pretty vague dude.


I should? Is baby killing mentioned?

Like, Babytotung ist der tagesordenung!!! Achtung!!
 
History Speaks said:
Mattogno thinks they shot children. Grow up.

All the evidence shows that your heroes were cowards and criminals. Shooting kids is not soldierly.
Click to expand...

You mean babies? Infants?

You seem to have a problem with nazis following orders. That sort of thing would be against orders.

Or would it? You tell me.
 
mrolonzo said:
That sort of thing would be against orders.
Click to expand...
Pathetic cope.

SS men were allowed to kill Jewish civilians even without an official order to do so, provided that their motivation was political anti-semitism, and not personal sadism, sexual fetishes, or pecuniary gains.

See attached a translated order from Himmler to this effect. If you say that the US government "forged it" like they forged the moon landings footage, there is also the Täubner judgment, which repeats this principle. I intend have to get a copy of it at some point.

Why not man up and admit your heroes machine gunned women and kids? You are already pretty close to admitting that. You do not deny that they engaged in the trafficking of children, taking them out of their homes and into the camps.

You defend the traffickers of little girls like (gentile) pic related. Why not go further and defend the murder of (Polish gentile and Jewish) children? It is the legacy of your heroes.
 

Attachments

  • Part 1 (1).jpg
    Part 1 (1).jpg
    177.5 KB · Views: 19
  • Part 2.jpg
    Part 2.jpg
    146.6 KB · Views: 27
  • Czeslawa_Kwoka_-_Brasse.jpg
    Czeslawa_Kwoka_-_Brasse.jpg
    482.1 KB · Views: 28
History Speaks said:
Pathetic cope.

SS men were allowed to kill Jewish civilians even without an official order to do so, provided that their motivation was political anti-semitism, and not personal sadism, sexual fetishes, or pecuniary gains.

See attached a translated order from Himmler to this effect. If you say that the US government "forged it" like they forged the moon landings footage, there is also the Täubner judgment, which repeats this principle. I intend have to get a copy of it at some point.

Why not man up and admit your heroes machine gunned women and kids? You are already pretty close to admitting that. You do not deny that they engaged in the trafficking of children, taking them out of their homes and into the camps.

You defend the traffickers of little girls like (gentile) pic related. Why not go further and defend the murder of (Polish gentile and Jewish) children? It is the legacy of your heroes.
Click to expand...

Right so sadism is out. But machine gunning women and children was a-ok?

Are we looking for the baby killing order?

Perhaps there was a manual on how to bayonet babies? Maybe that's where you get your extra energy from? The extra fat content?

Chugger said:
The document shows these killings were conducted n a "systematic" way with the support of the governor of Belarus, so yeah they were legal under Nazi law
Click to expand...

Ah systematic!! Did that make baby killing legal?

Was it industrial baby rape too just for good measure?

Is there no end to this endless cruelty?!
 
Chugger said:
The document shows these killings were conducted n a "systematic" way with the support of the governor of Belarus, so yeah they were legal under Nazi law
Click to expand...
The way this guy talks about the Nazis reminds me of a 4 year old who insists that his dad is the strongest man in the world. No evidence, all feels.
 
History Speaks said:
The way this guy talks about the Nazis reminds me of a 4 year old who insists that his dad is the strongest man in the world. No evidence, all feels.
Click to expand...

Gee. Its totally like that you guise!!

I get feels you don't like nazis dude. You need to check that. It's bad for you.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom