You're just giving your personal impression about their reputation. The flat earth is easily disprovable with physics experiment you can repeat yourself. Conversely, it took a multi million dollar hollywood funded legal team to find only 5 errors in one of irving's historical books in a legal case.
If irving is so kooky, point to some of his kooky statements and show how they are easily proven wrong.
David cole was at one of the extermination camps for less than a day and by asking questions forced them to admit they were misleading visitors.
Let’s talk about trials and courts, then.
There have been numerous trials in many different countries, including Germany itself, where various people had to answer to accusations that they were part of the final solution. Some of these trials, like the Nuremberg trials, covered high ranking officers, in others rank-and-file Nazis were on trial for their involvement. Some of the defendants confessed, like Stangl and Suchomel, and we have those confessions on the record (Suchomels was taped.)
In each trial, evidence of the defendants participation was entered into a record available to both defense and prosecution. So there were opportunities for each to critique the veracity of the documents, and yet they held up, and the Nazi’s defense was “just following orders”, not denial.
Doesn’t this support the reality of the Holocaust? If there were issues with the veracity of the evidence, wouldn’t the defense have said so, instead of defending themselves by chain of command?
Here’s a David Irving hot take: Irving says that Hitler didn’t know about the Holocaust and would have opposed the Final Solution if he had known. How on earth does that fit in with Hitler’s public statements about Jews needing to be utterly annihilated?
David Irving lost his libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt, meaning that he was found by the court to be a Holocaust denier who misrepresented history for ideological reasons. If there were troves of evidence proving the Holocaust never happened, why would Irving have not availed himself of it to clear his name?
- How many talks do you give annually? How many are specifically to Muslims, and how many are to non-Muslims?
- How readily do Muslims accept the facts of the Holocaust?
- Did any Muslim and Nazi leaders meet and congratulate each other for their mutual hatred of Jews?
- What specific prejudices does the Muslim world have against world Jewry and Holocaust denial?
Answer the questions, coptic poopskin. You owe your loyalty to the West for sheltering you from Muslim savages, but you're a traitor. Why do you refuse to challenge Muslims, coward?
This is called what-aboutery. You’re trying to change the subject to Muslims because you’ve no real response to History Speaks’ questions.
Jews died in the camps. Historical fact. There's no denying that as we've seen the footage of their skeletal remains being bulldozed into open pits. What's in question is whether they were gassed or whether they died from starvation and typhus as a result of Allied carpet bombing of German infrastructure.
Questioning whether the Jews were gassed doesn't mean denying Jews died in the camps. I personally believe that no Jews were gassed.
Why do you think both Britain and America have paid billions in compensation to Israel?
Look, the gassings are a historical fact verified by eyewitnesses from the SS and the camp victims and the Ukrainians who were forced to supervise and murder Sonderkommandos.
Your personal belief is irrelevant, you weren’t born yet and you weren’t there. Those who were left primary sources that are impossible to refute; attempts to do so fail because there’s just too much evidence to the contrary
Edit to add: the US gives aid to Egypt and Saudi Arabia too; more than they give to Israel. Do you think this is because the US is trying to manage its allies in the Middle East (likely) or because Egypt and Saudi are part of the Jewish scam to reclaim Israel??? (Ridiculous!)
