The Great Porn Debate - The Coomites vs Anti-Faparians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
If you're addicted to porn, you seek more cruel fucked up forms of it. That's part of the addiction.
Any addiction is just a symptom of underlying problems, what if the therapy of some people is watching hardcore pornography, that's just a part of life.
A bunch of moralistic retards wanting to get shocked and offended by other people lives won't change that.
You are the other side of SJWism
 
Any addiction is just a symptom of underlying problems, what if the therapy of some people is watching hardcore pornography, that's just a part of life.
A bunch of moralistic retards wanting to get shocked and offended by other people lives won't change that.
You are the other side of SJWism
Is extreme hardcore snuff paedophilia really that moral to you?
 
You are the other side of SJWism
ERBna-9W4AA851D.jpg

LOL you are so stupid nobody's talking about that.
Actually, Android Raptor was defending that just a few days ago in hentai form.
 
Stop watching porn and have sex with real women.
- Shinzo Abe?

lowering birth rates in developed and in developing countries
I don't think porn alone is responsible for declining birthrates in the developing world, nor is the lack of it solely responsible for a higher birthrate in crapholes.

The presence of nudity, sex, pornography and everything imaginable has been the constant companion of human life since our species emerged.
I think "porn" itself isn't inherently bad: it depends on what it is and how it's used. Like drawings of sexy fictional adults is one thing, real people fornicating or worse is another. Just viewing it is one thing, being an addict or "coomer" or "gooner" is another.
 
Last edited:
But with that said Im sure with AI theres gonna be AI CP which is going to have little to no arguments against except pedos are mentally ill and deserve to be shot.


Yeah I tend to be a free speech absolutist but everyone has to have a line so I guess I'm not an absolutist. My line is pretty much that, nothing else besides that and spam
 
There's no compelling argument for it being good that I've ever heard.
More or less, but trying to outright ban it isnt going to work in the digital era, internet era.

IMO its one of many things that exist that you shouldnt try to ban altogether as cons outweigh the positives. Alcohol is the greatest example of this. Now with that said theres certainly no reason society should tolerate (((people))) happily pushing and nonchalantly embracing onlyfans and the like.
 
Tensively acceptable when its' use is a phase, interferes with regular relationships. Makes you make moon eyes at everyone, broadcasting addiction. Dishonorable, even men who high five one another about its use secretly feel malefic shame worming into their cerebellum. Anyone over 35 who promotes the use of porn is a Son of Belial.

Edit; it also trains your brain to always be seeking pleasure and away from any and all emotion that could be considered negative. This renders you unwilling to do work, which is generally unpleasant to begin with.
 
Last edited:
Look you shouldn't look at **** not healthy for the body mine gives you unrealistic expectations about sex however people screaming that **** is literally the devil why drinking large amounts of alcohol caffeine or a bunch of other crap that's also addictive should get off the damn high horse it's like the people smoking and ******** about people looking at ****
 
Odd how porn was a thing before Current Year, and yet it didn't lead to those with addictions "trooning out" like in Clown World now.
I don't think that access to it and early exposure to it was the norm before now though.
There's been internet porn since the late '90s. Although video and image resolution before the 2010s was more limited, and of course kids could not get on the internet unsupervised as easily. That first major "smartphone" release was the iPhone in 2007, and I think "smartphones" didn't become a big thing with kids until sometime after 2012 - 2015 -- which happens to be the start of Current Year.

But it seems that still doesn't explain the "trooning out" thing: something about Clown World porn seems to make addicts in Current Year more likely to "troon out" than porn addicts prior to the '10s. "Social media" and "identity politics" may (also) play a role.

In any case, letting kids use "smartphones" and "social media" unsupervised may not be the best idea.
 
I just fapped and found this thread.

That's all.

Carry on.
The Emperor's seed takes no root in women! - Ulfar, Wolf Guard.

Both sides are bad. One obvious, the others want Patriot Act Chips because le porn ban is worth it.

The big problem is that kids are raised by iphones with absent parents. No father = giggly goonclowns.

It will only get worse.
 
Porn should be banned, imo, and pornographers should get custodial sentences.
I've read that overall, sex crimes have gone down when porn is not banned. But, at the same time, there can be number of porn addicts who get desensitized and go after increasingly degenerate stuff, like how you described. And yet, trying to ban porn could be just as much of a failure as the "War on Drugs" or "Prohibition", with more people going into one of -- if not the -- biggest prison systems.

Personally, I think what should not be a thing in porn is at least the sick stuff, as well as real people fornicating or worse in live action -- if such were possible.

Zoomers are fucked, they'll never know what a real family looks like outside of old sitcoms.
Current Year sucks.

also:
In any case, letting kids use "smartphones" and "social media" unsupervised may not be the best idea.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom