The employees secretly using Ai at work

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
L | O
Some employers are either tacitly or outright banning access to generative AI tools like ChatGPT. But employees who love them are finding ways to discreetly backchannel.

Since OpenAI launched ChatGPT in November 2022, companies have scrambled to keep its workplace use under control.
Many organisations are concerned their data will be leaked – not only unintentionally training OpenAI algorithms with sensitive information, but also potentially surfacing corporate secrets to competitors' prompts, says Simon Johnson, head of the global economics and management group at MIT Sloan School of Management, in Massachusetts, US.
Yet many workers love the technology, and have come to desire, even depend on it.
"These are practical tools that make life easier, such as content aggregation – rather than look through several sources to find an obscure organisational policy, ChatGPT can provide a useful first draft in moments," says Bryan Hancock, partner at McKinsey & Co, based in Washington, DC. "They can also aid with technical tasks, like coding, and complete routine tasks that lighten employees' cognitive load and schedules."
Berlin-based business consultant Matt and his colleague were among the first at their workplace to discover ChatGPT, mere weeks after its release. He says the chatbot transformed their workdays overnight. "It was like discovering a video game cheat," says Matt. "I asked a really technical question from my PhD thesis, and it provided an answer that no one would be able to find without consulting people with very specific expertise. I knew it would be a game changer."
Day-to-day tasks in his fast-paced environment – such as researching scientific topics, gathering sources and producing thorough presentations to clients – suddenly became a breeze. The only catch: Matt and his colleague had to keep their use of ChatGPT a closely guarded secret. They accessed the tool covertly, mostly on working-from-home days.
"We had a significant competitive advantage against our colleagues – our output was so much faster and they couldn't comprehend how. Our manager was very impressed and spoke about our performance with senior management," he says.

Workers are finding ways to access the technology in secret, whether by simply blocking their screens from view or employing higher-tech solutions (Credit: Alamy)
Whether the technology is explicitly banned, highly frowned upon or giving some workers a covert leg up, some employees are searching for ways to keep using generative AI tools discreetly. The technology is increasingly becoming an employee backchannel: in a February 2023 study by professional social network Fishbowl, 68% of 5,067 respondents who used AI at work said they don't disclose usage to their bosses.
Even in instances without workplace bans, employees may still want to keep their use of AI hidden, or at least guarded, from peers. "We don't have norms established around AI yet – it can initially look like you're conceding you're not actually that good at your job if the machine is doing many of your tasks," says Johnson. "It's natural that people would want to conceal that."
As a result, forums are popping up for workers to swap strategies for keeping a low profile. In communities like Reddit, many people seek methods of secretly circumventing workplace bans, either through high-tech solutions (integrating ChatGPT into a native app disguised as a workplace tool) or rudimentary ones to obscure usage (adding a privacy screen, or discreetly accessing the technology on their personal phone at their desk).
And an increasing number of workers who've come to depend on AI may have to start looking for ways to avoid attention. According to an August 2023 BlackBerry survey of 2,000 global IT decision makers, 75% are currently considering or implementing bans on ChatGPT and other generative AI applications in the workplace, with 61% saying the measures are intended to be long-term or permanent.
While these bans may help companies keep sensitive information out of the wrong hands, Hancock says keeping generative AI away from workers, particularly on a longer-term basis, can backfire. "AI tools are set to become part of the employee experience, so restricting access to them without providing a vision of when and how they'll be adopted – such as following the introduction of guardrails – could create frustration," he says. "And that could lead to folks thinking of working somewhere with access to the tools they need."
As for Matt, he's found a workaround to keep a step ahead. He and his colleague have begun covertly using the search engine platform Perplexity. Like ChatGPT, it's a generative AI tool that returns complex written answers to basic prompts in an instant. Matt likes Perplexity even more than ChatGPT: it features real-time information and cites sources that can be quickly checked, ideal when his presentations require in-depth, up-to-date knowledge. He queries it hundreds of times a day on his work laptop, often working remotely, and uses it more than Google.
He hopes he can keep using his latest AI tool in secret, for as long as possible. For him, it's worth the minor inconvenience of occasionally having to dim his laptop screen in the office – and not sharing resources with his wider team. "I prefer keeping the competitive advantage," he says.
 
I like how this article talks about how dimming your screen actually works. Any truly competent organization has an insider risk team which scores your behavior and a TLS interception proxy service that either sees everything or just the metadata, depending on choice. Sorry for sperging, this article just made me start shaking.
 
Any truly competent organization has an insider risk team which scores your behavior and a TLS interception proxy service that either sees everything or just the metadata, depending on choice.
They are called shit companies you avoid.

All the professional meetings are now about "AI" and its a lot of gen x asking completely retarded questions about how ChatGPT will magically steal their secrets while being completely oblivious to pressing security issues.
 
Matt likes Perplexity even more than ChatGPT: it features real-time information and cites sources that can be quickly checked, ideal when his presentations require in-depth, up-to-date knowledge.
This actually sounds pretty handy but if it uses anything openai as a backend it's going to be horribly biased.

That's my main problem with most mainstream ai. They're censored and biased. Chatgpt exists in a very sterile, corporate, disneyfied existence and all of its answers reflect this. It will also present completely incorrect things as facts. Ai llms don't have any concept of right or wrong or correct or incorrect, they literally just output text that their algorithms determine are the next correct series of characters based on patterns of characters that appear in their training data. They have no actual understanding of anything they output. They work pretty similarly to the auto predict on phone keyboards.

Also, I would be extremely hesitant to blindly trust code output by any of these models because again, they have no actual understanding of the code, they just output whatever tokens their training data tells them should be output.
 
>Oh, by the way, pls subscribe to Persplexacilicious
More fucking sponsored content.
Anyway, I expect people who want to use AI at work just bring a laptop or tablet in like they do with porn. Work computers are for email.
 
Pencil Pushers about to get their shit pushed in for once.
If ChatGPT can actually generate content to replace your work, you're an over-educated retard.
 
Can't wait for the competency apocalipse. Stupid shit will start malfunctioning and an army of pajeets and app brained zoomers won't be able to fix it or even realize whats wrong. Backdoors up your ass, the Matrix itself will start bugging out and homeless men in the streets will float around T posing
 
I like how this article talks about how dimming your screen actually works. Any truly competent organization has an insider risk team which scores your behavior and a TLS interception proxy service that either sees everything or just the metadata, depending on choice. Sorry for sperging, this article just made me start shaking. I mean, like the pair here who use it at home is there anything stopping someone using AI on their phone or something rather than the company network? I'm more suprised how they seem to take the AI product at face value. Yeah, its pretty good as a search engine but if it doesn't know something it just makes stuff up sometimes. Suppose it depends on what you're asking but if it is so niche and specialist my other alternative is to consult field leaders I don't know if I'd consider the AI and the couple-of-years-out-of-date training data as authoritive.
 
Can't wait for the competency apocalipse. Stupid shit will start malfunctioning and an army of pajeets and app brained zoomers won't be able to fix it or even realize whats wrong. Backdoors up your ass, the Matrix itself will start bugging out and homeless men in the streets will float around T posing
Competent people use ChatGPT to speed up their work.
Incompetent people use it as a crutch.
People can't differentiate the two.
 
Competent people use ChatGPT to speed up their work.
Incompetent people use it as a crutch.
People can't differentiate the two.
Yep.
My friend uses that shit to organize excel datasheets.
The inbred owner of whatever company he works at used to just put client info into plaintext on notepad and asked him to put that shit on Excel.
He basically got a free vacation since he used the paid chat GPT with faster speeds to make it all nice and tidy for him.
The fun fact? He's so computer illiterate he thinks my friend is a genius and digitized his database, my friend also keeps telling him that he does his own JavaScript to automate that shit, not chatgpt since the pajeet will simply fire him and use chatgpt instead.
:story:
 
I like how this article talks about how dimming your screen actually works. Any truly competent organization has an insider risk team which scores your behavior and a TLS interception proxy service that either sees everything or just the metadata, depending on choice. Sorry for sperging, this article just made me start shaking.
I like how this article talks about how dimming your screen actually works. Any truly competent organization has an insider risk team which scores your behavior and a TLS interception proxy service that either sees everything or just the metadata, depending on choice. Sorry for sperging, this article just made me start shaking. I mean, like the pair here who use it at home is there anything stopping someone using AI on their phone or something rather than the company network? I'm more suprised how they seem to take the AI product at face value. Yeah, its pretty good as a search engine but if it doesn't know something it just makes stuff up sometimes. Suppose it depends on what you're asking but if it is so niche and specialist my other alternative is to consult field leaders I don't know if I'd consider the AI and the couple-of-years-out-of-date training data as authoritive.

you got your bot running the same script in two places bro.
 
He basically got a free vacation since he used the paid chat GPT with faster speeds to make it all nice and tidy for him.
ChatGPT 4 has plugins for Excel and PDF manipulation. Its worth the money if you have a need.

The fun fact? He's so computer illiterate he thinks my friend is a genius and digitized his database, my friend also keeps telling him that he does his own JavaScript to automate that shit, not chatgpt since the pajeet will simply fire him and use chatgpt instead.
:story:
This reminds me of the guys in the 2000s who learned VBScript in Excel to do a lot of their jobs and having to hide that fact because managers would want to fire them, leaving the company without someone who knows how to manage the script. FYI, you can use python to control excel so you have access to all the python libraries.

I know someone who works for a staffing company and a new "owner" who is the wife(so they can say they're "woman owned") of the former owner is always in the latest fad. She has hired some friend to code away the jobs of the office ladies who match candidates to jobs using "AI". I don't think she understands the limitations but people like her are always excited to fire people to eek out some more money and have a "success journey".

Low IQ combined with greed and/or narcissism can sink companies.
 
Last edited:
ChatGPT 4 has plugins for Excel and PDF manipulation. Its worth the money if you have a need.


This reminds me of the guys in the 2000s who learned VBScript in Excel to do a lot of their jobs and having to hide that fact because managers would want to fire them, leaving the company without someone who knows how to manage the script. FYI, you can use python to control excel so you have access to all the python libraries.

I know someone who works for a staffing company and a new "owner" who is the wife(so they can say they're "woman owned") of the former owner is always in the latest fad. She has hired some friend to code away the jobs of the office ladies who match candidates to jobs using "AI". I don't think she understands the limitations but people like her are always excited to fire people to eek out some more money and have a "success journey".

Low IQ combined with greed and/or narcissism can sink companies.
it will be funny to finally see chat gpt/bard integrated into Office and google docs by the end of the year, that will change a lot of shit.
 
it will be funny to finally see chat gpt/bard integrated into Office and google docs by the end of the year, that will change a lot of shit.
That brings up how people will change their opinions on a dime if the tech/ideology they are hostile to is subsequently linked to something that's considered socially acceptable by the powers that be. They did that with deepfakes. They went from wanting them banned because porn to thinking its funny because some major media outlet deepfaked a celebrity onto the Full House intro. Wait for the HR/management people who hated "AI" to immediately sing its praises the second Clippy/Cortana tardwrangles them in Excel, Docs, or Exchange.
 
Back
Top Bottom