Science The Big Bang Theory Has Been Debunked?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Source (Archive)

Science appreciators around the world have been pleased with the new images being produced by the James Webb Space Telescope. This new highly advanced telescope has showcased images of the stairways that no one has ever seen before. While the public has been transfixed by how many new galaxies, stars, and more have been shown, it has caused a panic among astronomers and cosmologist communities. One of the growing concerns for these new images is that it has begun to produce papers that might be indirectly stating that the Big Bang Theory has been debunked, which would be massively heartbreaking for many people.

Many scientists have been studying these new images and determining evidence that has stood for many years. The big bang theory essentially states that the universe began some 14 billion years ago in an incredibly hot and dense state that has been expanding ever since. However, the characteristics of the galaxies that are furthest away should be huge and contain a “red shirt” to their light. What the James Webb Telescope has discovered is that those galaxies are the complete opposite. An astronomer at the University of Kansas in Lawrence, Alison Patrick, spoke about this new evidence with great panic. According to Patrick, “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning and wondering if everything I've done is wrong.”

The new evidence would debunk the Big Bang Theory in a big way, as the initial idea is the universe exploded into existence and began to expand. In fact, it should be ever-expanding. But the new galaxies found are said to be older than when the Big Bang was said to have initially occurred. The young stars in those far galaxies should be hot and blue in color, as most young stars are. However, the stars being discovered are all cooler and reddish in color, indicating they are older than when the Big Bang would have occurred. Naturally, these new findings would have a massive impact on the scientific community. The Big Bang Theory being debunked would result in years of research being useless, in a sense. More importantly, the religious community that has believed that a singular god created the universe and accompanying stars would have some much better ground to stand on.

The Big Bang Theory was initially devised in 1931. Should it be debunked, it would cause scientists to rethink their entire careers. The astronomer that voiced her panic is just one of the many people that would likely lose sleep over such a massive discovery. The scientific community might continue to be in an uproar when more galaxies are discovered by the James Webb Space Telescope.

Science uses hypotheses and theories to determine and test anything in the known universe. However, years of research and data might be deemed wrong should the Big Bang Theory truly be debunked. If it is debunked, it might cause an existential crisis for astronomers, cosmologists, and regular people. Those who have rejected the idea of God, but adopted the Big Bang, would then have to ask themselves: “where did all these galaxies come from?”
 
Why would someone be 'heartbroken' that the big bang theory specifically isn't true? Science is supposed to be about adapting to new information and if that includes moving away from long standing theories, so be it. Of course the I fucking love science crowd has made 'science' generically a religion and slowly started to try and break that fact. Nonetheless here I don't get how this would automatically discredit it as a whole. Oh no, the universe may be older than is predicted! Obviously that means the big bang is entirely wrong and not just based around a false date of origin that could eventually be fixed to fit this new information. Just another sensationalist article that says a whole lot of nothing.
 
this article is fat and I would not have sex with it
a) there's nothing keeping a creator deity from going "dude, what if I make the universe with a big bang"
b) "our guesses about what a big bang would look like aren't there" doesn't negate a big bang, just our guesses
c) I fucked your mom #TYCED
 
Contradictory evidence to a complex theory doesn't automatically debunk the whole thing, as much as it shows "Some of the best-fit assumptions we made are no longer best-fit". A lot of the numbers in a lot of cosmology are 'magic numbers', pulled because they explained and predicted, to this point, things we've seen. Now if thats no longer the case, we know that there's more complexity than a presumed constant, and new stuff to research.

That being said, watching the trust the science people face a meltdown of something that's so predominant as to be entire peoples lives work come up to be faulty would be hilarious, with recent events being how they've been.
 
Evolutionists btfo
chad.png
 
Contradictory evidence to a complex theory doesn't automatically debunk the whole thing, as much as it shows "Some of the best-fit assumptions we made are no longer best-fit". A lot of the numbers in a lot of cosmology are 'magic numbers', pulled because they explained and predicted, to this point, things we've seen. Now if thats no longer the case, we know that there's more complexity than a presumed constant, and new stuff to research.

That being said, watching the trust the science people face a meltdown of something that's so predominant as to be entire peoples lives work come up to be faulty would be hilarious, with recent events being how they've been.
Journos don't understand anything they write about, news at 11.
 
I think the idea itself is tantalizing, I don't think anyone's going to wake up in a year and say "Welp, Steady State is back on the menu, boys!" but it does give me a tiny bit of existential happiness to know that maybe just perhaps the universe isn't doomed to an eternity of proton decay and then nothing forever after. That said if they're really seeing things older than their calendar noted big bang and they admit that, I'm gonna laugh...
 
The universe was created one fateful day when God sat down on his holy toilet after his trip to Mexican Heaven.
 
So just after these crazy generative art programs like DALL-E have been written, we suddenly get all these amazing pictures from the start of the universe.
Isn't is all just a tiny bit sus?
 
James Webb is looking where the simulation hasn’t rendered correctly yet. Give it a minute to get past the loading screen.
 
According to Patrick, “Right now I find myself lying awake at three in the morning and wondering if everything I've done is wrong.”
Maybe I'm just fucked up or something but the thought of this pencil neck getting a case of existential dread over this is hilarious to me and I don't particularly know why.
 
This reads like a small time pastor's personal blog. How did it get onto MSN?

On the "science" itself, this doesn't look like a debunking of the Big Bang. It looks like counter evidence against the "infinitely expanding universe" part of the theory. There's another version that claims there's some universal limit, which will either slow the expansion completely, or even start collapsing back into the center.
 
What do they mean it would promote religion? It already promotes religion.

The Big Bang just screams creation, "Let there be light!"
 
Apparently, they haven't even looked at these galaxies with the proper tools to determine their distance, which tells us their age. Just some calculations from what they have. So they may very well be closer than thought, there could be gas clouds and other things interfering with estimating their red shift and distance. Plenty of things to wait for and to consider before assuming the Big Bang Theory is debunked, even if this is true it debunks shit. It's just more knowledge to fold into what we know and the evidence of the Big Bang Theory is plenty. Unsurprisingly all it'd means is the more we observe the more complex our understanding will become.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom