- Joined
- Jan 20, 2022
That is some retarded reasoning. Thing X is popular and good because it's good and popular.Used to be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is some retarded reasoning. Thing X is popular and good because it's good and popular.Used to be.
No, you are a sucker for korean women and bad music!I guess I'm just a sucker for elegant looking stuff
https://youtube.com/watch?v=QMysxY4NNNg
I love this. Something sort of related that I've been trying to articulate is early 2000s animal or zoo-related children's media.Something I really love is this kind of stuff:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mwj__Fh0ZeYIf I had fuck you money I'd make a house completely out of marble with an atrium and lots of skylights.
Maybe I'm nostalgia-blinded, but kids stuff was so much cooler in the 90s-2000s. The CD-ROM era, kids' magazines like Highlights, it was just so positive and informative.I love this. Something sort of related that I've been trying to articulate is early 2000s animal or zoo-related children's media.
It's not nostalgia blinds. Children having smartphones messed up a lot of things.Maybe I'm nostalgia-blinded, but kids stuff was so much cooler in the 90s-2000s. The CD-ROM era, kids' magazines like Highlights, it was just so positive and informative.
God yes it did. Ted Kaczynski was right tbh.It's not nostalgia blinds. Children having smartphones messed up a lot of things.
That's how they get greenlit. There are almost no "creators" anymore. Even people like Craig McCracken have come out and said things like "I've pitched 16 shows and only reboots were approved".Side note, I miss when kids shows didn't have therapy speak and woke values crammed in there and could just be about whatever they were about. Like even when Postcards From Buster had a pair of wives in one episode it wasn't all about lesbians, they just happened to be the people talking to the crew about where they live. Shit ramped up so aggressively in Current Year, I miss the way it used to be.
I remember volunteering in a nursery, the babies LOVED Pancake Manor.It's why more than a handful of mothers I know these days are turning to things like YouTube/Ms. Rachel, and rewatching old shows instead.
Something I really love is this kind of stuff:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mwj__Fh0ZeYIf I had fuck you money I'd make a house completely out of marble with an atrium and lots of skylights.
I feel like jungle/rainforest imagery was a big thing in general in the mid-late 90's into the 00's: Poison dart frogs, macaws, a big ol’ toucan… Either that or dolphins swimming through coral reefs of colorful tropical fish.I love this. Something sort of related that I've been trying to articulate is early 2000s animal or zoo-related children's media.
I'm completely out-of-touch with anything involving kids these days, but "edutainment" isn't really a genre anymore, is it? It's funny how you'd expect those sorts of games and shows to be seen as cheesy, but that kind of stuff is actually looked back on really fondly by people who grew up with it.Maybe I'm nostalgia-blinded, but kids stuff was so much cooler in the 90s-2000s. The CD-ROM era, kids' magazines like Highlights, it was just so positive and informative.
Holy shit lil ugly mane coverThread tax: https://x.com/MihifuHi
View attachment 7510097View attachment 7510096View attachment 7510104
That's how they get greenlit. There are almost no "creators" anymore. Even people like Craig McCracken have come out and said things like "I've pitched 16 shows and only reboots were approved".
The whole system has become too large to make anything beyond the entertainment equivalent of processed food. It's why more than a handful of mothers I know these days are turning to things like YouTube/Ms. Rachel, and rewatching old shows instead.
Speaking personally, though, I prefer Herbie at his second job working for Reason:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zsHH9qcPQZg
Everyone is talking about the very appealing aesthetics from the past.
Does anyone even have a single thought about modern aesthetics?
I doubt it because it's thoughtless.
For example, there are things that you could say about the 90s Microsoft Windows logo. It catches your eye for a moment:
View attachment 8071146
I doubt anyone has anything to say about the current Microsoft Windows logo, it's in one eye and out the other in an instant:
View attachment 8071150
I don't think it's fair to even call modern aesthetics "minimalism" anymore, there is just no aesthetic at all, it's one step away from being nothing.
In fact, there is actually no way they could simplify this logo any further.
Although maybe a change is happening and it's somehow for the worse. Microsoft has decided to start making icons that have no describable features or colours, they are just blobby meaningless blobs.
Take Copilot for instance, look at this -
View attachment 8071171
If you were trying to tell your mother over the phone what icon to click on, you'd have to say "click on the thing that looks like folded paper with a hole in the middle that is bluey-orangy-purply-greenny", which actually describes a number of their other new icons as well.
Maybe they asked Copilot to make their new icons.
...
Anyway, my point being, we have gone from the ugly boring minimalism aesthetic of the 2010s to less than minimalism in the 2020s.