Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Murder tends to benefit the murderer.Access to abortion is turning over the tide
View attachment 1625822
30 years ago this wasn't the case. They were the mostly likely to be poor, living in section 8 housing and to have kids out of wedlock. Things are changing for them now because of family planning.
That's like saying it's responsible to wear a helmet when bashing your head against a wall.
It's more responsible than not wearing a helmet I suppose, but still extremely irresponsible.
Who says it's murder? I'd say you are the immoral one by forcing children, who would only suffer by being born, to be born. That makes you a shitty person. I'd even say that makes you a torturer. Why are you for torturing babies?I certainly don't think those women should murder their innocent children.
I'm sorry that you can't see the clear moral line here and are so deluded that you think clear moral lines don't exist.
The phrasing you people choose to use makes it impossible to take you seriously.
We're not forcing anyone to be born. We're not walking around forcefully inseminating women.
We're forcing you not to commit murder.
And that choice has consequences.Well, I hate to break it to you, but people are gonna fuck.
Reality.Who says it's murder?
I am not forcing anyone to be born. I am not applying any force to the baby. I have no part in its conception or its birth, and I certainly did not force either to occur.I'd say you are the immoral one by forcing children, who would only suffer by being born, to be born.
No, actually, it makes me a moral person.That makes you a shitty person.
You would be factually incorrect.I'd even say that makes you a torturer.
Can you point to the specific people actively causing pain in babies with their own actions? Because that's what torture is.Why are you for torturing babies?
I'm literally not.You're forcing babies to be born only for them to suffer
Reality.
I am not forcing anyone to be born. I am not applying any force to the baby. I have no part in its conception or its birth, and I certainly did not force either to occur.
I'm just forcing you not to murder your baby.
Wrong. It makes you a terrible person. A sadistic torturer. That's worse than a person who gets an abortion.No, actually, it makes me a moral person.
You would be factually incorrect.
Can you point to the specific people actively causing pain in babies with their own actions? Because that's what torture is.
Permitting pain which you did not cause to exist is not torture you can be personally blamed for.
None of you people seem to understand basic concepts like mens rea or personal responsibility for direct actions and their direct consequences.
You can't blame me for things I don't do lmao.
You don't get your own reality. There's just one.No, your reality says that. Most peoples reality does not. Your reality does not equal real reality.
Forcing you not to kill someone is not forcing that person to live. I had no active part in the creation of their life and bear zero responsibility for it.Yes, you are. If a couple is trying to conceive and their baby would end up having a condition that would only mean it would suffer its entire life, you are forcing them to be born. You're a sadistic torturer. You have no morals.
Your attempt to mirror my moral superiority in a sad attempt to make me understand how you feel is cute.Wrong. It makes you a terrible person. A sadistic torturer. That's worse than a person who gets an abortion.
"Forced to be born" would be a c-section. You don't seem to understand what the word forced means. I would need to take some action that is directly responsible for them being born. I have done no such thing. I have taken literally zero actions and caused literally nothing.they should be forced to be born
You keep using the word forced wrong.You also are saying a woman, if raped, should be forced to have the baby and even be financially responsible for it.
You don't get your own reality. There's just one.
You missed my whole post there. Learn to read before you tell us what murder isForcing you not to kill someone is not forcing that person to live. I had no active part in the creation of their life and bear zero responsibility for it.
Your attempt to mirror my moral superiority in a sad attempt to make me understand how you feel is cute.
The problem is you clearly don't actually believe what you're saying, and I certainly don't.
So it's a stupid argumentative line to pursue.
"Forced to be born" would be a c-section. You don't seem to understand what the word forced means. I would need to take some action that is directly responsible for them being born. I have done no such thing. I have taken literally zero actions and caused literally nothing.
You keep using the word forced wrong.
The rapist forced her to be pregnant. I didn't. I didn't force her to do anything.
All I did was force her not to commit murder.
How many people died in china while you typed this sentence you murderous monster?If you watch someone cross the street about to be hit by a car, and you process in your brain, "I will not prevent this person's suffering."
You are a morally reprehensible person.
What force am I applying to them specifically which specifically and directly causes their suffering?You are forcing these people to suffer because of your warped view of what murder is.
I bear zero responsibility for something I had no part in causing.You are thus wanting to be responsible for innocent people suffering.
Like I said, this transparent attempt to mirror my tone is sad.That makes you a sadistic torturer. You should be ashamed of yourself. I know it's difficult because of your autism, but try to think of things from others perspectives.
I think even just abandoning your child to adoption is pretty unfathomably immoral.
Could you elaborate on this? Why should an aunt, who had nothing to do with the baby's creation, be stuck raising the child, when the baby could instead be placed with a couple who wants to raise it?That's what family is for. Let an aunt raise the kid.
How did society get so fucked up that someone is unironically asking this question?Could you elaborate on this? Why should an aunt, who had nothing to do with the baby's creation, be stuck raising the child, when the baby could instead be placed with a couple who wants to raise it?
I cannot prevent that, in the hypothetical situation that i proposed, you could.How many people died in china while you typed this sentence you murderous monster?
That doesn't answer my question. A random aunt did not create the baby and is not responsible for the baby. A random aunt isn't even guaranteed to exist. There are many couples seeking to adopt babies. Why is it immoral to place your baby for adoption with one of those couples?How did society get so fucked up that someone is unironically asking this question?
You could buy a plane ticket right now, fly to china, find the guy about to get hit by a car, and prevent it.I cannot prevent that, in the hypothetical situation that i proposed, you could.
CorrectA random aunt did not create the baby
Incorrect.and is not responsible for the baby.
Because you have a responsibility to that baby, and they don't.Why is it immoral to place your baby for adoption with one of those couples?
That would be at a great cost, in the car situation, all you need to do is yell.You could buy a plane ticket right now, fly to china, find the guy about to get hit by a car, and prevent it.
You could iterate that for every discrete person who died. Ability to solve their problems is irrelevant. What's relevant is personal responsibility for those problems. You didn't cause them, and you have no personal obligations toward the person suffering them, so you have no moral impetus obligating you to fix them.
Permitting someone to die is not murder. You permit people to die every second of every day. You must personally cause it to be responsible for it.
Is the cost of upholding a moral obligation a factor in whether or not you must uphold it?hat would be at a great cost, in the car situation, all you need to do is yell.
Yes it isIs cost a factor?
Hint: no.
No.Yes it is
Well im right and your wrong, because im probably bigger than you