- Joined
- Dec 12, 2020
I fully understand the separation of Church and State. However, it is rarely applied these days and a few the SC Justices (Barrett and Kavanaugh specifically) are bound to rule based on their moral/religious beliefs.or do you not understand the separation of church and state?
In addition to that, Roe was based on pretty suspect legal grounds. It essentially made up a "right to privacy" that didn't exist in the 14th amendment. Based on the ruling, anyone could in theory claim that they don't have to listen to a subpoena, which is kind of ridiculous if you think about it.
As @snailslime , the famed Biblical scholar, just pointed out, the original Hebrew text meant something more akin to "Thou shalt not murder". Somewhere along the line of telephone that is Biblical translation, someone mistranslated "murder" as "kill", and it stuck. Probably because they mean the exact same thing in context.you're weaseling out of "thou shall not kill" by not including animals as things you cannot kill.
He's one of the good ones. Same with the Apostles (except Judas, that faggot can go fuck himself), St. Paul, and many others that either converted to Christianity or agreed to not act like insufferable kikes.Lmao, there we go, the hypocrisy. You worship a Jew.