US Ten Tariff Questions Never Asked - The real trade war wasn’t Trump’s - it was decades of lopsided deals, deficits, and double standards America tolerated while others profited...

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

1.Trump’s So-Called “Trade War.”

Many call the American effort to obtain either tariff parity or a reduction in the roughly $1 trillion trade deficit and fifty years of consecutive trade deficits “a trade war.” But then what do they call the policies of the past half-century by Europe, Asia, China, and others to ensure asymmetrical tariffs, pseudo-health and security trade restrictions, and large surpluses?
A trade peace? Trade fairness?

2. Do Nations Prefer Surpluses or Deficits?

Why do most nations prefer trade surpluses and protective tariffs?
Are Europe, Asia, China, and others stupid? Are they suicidal in continuing their trade surpluses and protective or asymmetrical tariffs?
Is the United States uniquely brilliant in maintaining a half-century of cumulative trade deficits? Do Americans alone discover the advantages of a $1 trillion annual trade deficit and small or nonexistent tariffs?
Why don’t America’s trading partners prefer deficits like ours—given we supposedly believe they are either advantageous or perhaps irrelevant?

3. Would Our Trade Partners Prefer to Trade Places With Us?

Would our trade partners prefer to have America’s supposed benefits of a $1-trillion trade deficit?
Would the United States then “suffer” like they do by running up $200 billion annual surpluses?

4. What if Wages Went Up at the Rate of the Stock Market?

What would now be the reaction of the stock market if over the last decade wages had increased at the rate of stocks—and the stocks at the rate of wages?

5. Is Wall Street’s Panic Based on What Might Happen—Or What Is Happening?

Is Wall Street’s meltdown a fear of what might happen in the future? Or is it reacting to March’s latest jobs report that there were 93,000 more jobs created than predicted? Was the Wall Street panic predicated on reports of much lower oil prices? Did the furor arise over the March inflation report that the annualized inflation rate dipped to 2.6% per year?

6. Is the Frenzy Caused by the Trump Economic Agenda?

Is Wall Street’s worry that Trump’s impending tax cuts, more deregulation, greater budget cuts, and continued efforts to eliminate budget deficits and reduce national debt will stall economic growth?

7. What About North American Neighbors?

If the U.S. was running a $63 billion-plus trade surplus with Canada, refusing to meet its NATO requirements to spend 2 percent of GDP on defense, and instead spent only 1.37 percent, would Canada become concerned?
If Mexico were running a $171 billion trade deficit with the U.S., if Americans in Mexico were sending over $60 billion per year out of Mexico to the U.S., and if American drug dealers were making $20 billion by selling fentanyl and opioids to Mexico, would Mexico be angry?

8. Is the Trump Agenda Bad Economic News?

Is the current panic over tariffs amplified by Trump’s other policies?
Is the sudden end of 10,000 illegal entries a day bothering Wall Street?
Are the media furious that the Red Sea is suddenly navigable again, the Houthis in Yemen curtailing their attacks?
Is the outrage due to the targeting of approximately $200 billion in budget cuts or plans to shave off $500 billion from the annual budget? Does the conundrum arise because Trump is sanctioning Iran, unapologetically supporting Israel, and seeking an end to the Ukraine War?

9. Was the Biden Record Preferable?

Should Trump try to match Biden’s $7 trillion addition to the national debt? Should he return to allowing 12 million illegal aliens into the country? Was the 2021 Afghanistan pullout a good model? Is Wall Street worried that Trump may copy the Biden New Green Deal, his electric vehicle mandates, and more green regulations?

10. Why the Negotiations and Why Now?

Why are 70 countries now wishing to negotiate tariffs with America either down to zero or reciprocally to the same rate as ours?
Is that a good thing? If so, why did our trade partners not wish to lower their trade barriers far earlier?
Did they suddenly and spontaneously decide they were acting unfairly and, on their own prompt, now want to make amends?
What’s Next?
If there soon is a rush of nations to cut a deal with the U.S. and not to be left out of the American market, will there follow another hysterical Wall Street spasm—but not to sell, but instead to buy stocks at bargain prices?
 

Do Nations Prefer Surpluses or Deficits?

Why do most nations prefer trade surpluses and protective tariffs?
Are Europe, Asia, China, and others stupid? Are they suicidal in continuing their trade surpluses and protective or asymmetrical tariffs?
Is the United States uniquely brilliant in maintaining a half-century of cumulative trade deficits? Do Americans alone discover the advantages of a $1 trillion annual trade deficit and small or nonexistent tariffs?
Why don’t America’s trading partners prefer deficits like ours—given we supposedly believe they are either advantageous or perhaps irrelevant?
The long answer comes from "modern monetary theory", and to understand why its a short term, yet unreliable strategy. The idea is that the government borrows money to use in purchasing goods or services and then prints money to pay back the debt. Because the printed money has a bit less value than the borrowed money, despite both sums being the same face amount, "value" flows in the direction of the borrowing country. This isnt new and has been tried countless times. The reasons this is a bad thing are numerous. Value not only gets extracted from other countries, who retaliate in tariffs or currency manipulation of their own, but also extracts value from the savings of citizens. This leads to loss in productivity as more and more people lack the capital necessary to create jobs, quality of life diminishes, and buying power tanks. The core thesis of the federal reserve has been to keep the statute quo ~3% intrest and that's just not possible.

Would Our Trade Partners Prefer to Trade Places With Us?

Would our trade partners prefer to have America’s supposed benefits of a $1-trillion trade deficit?
Would the United States then “suffer” like they do by running up $200 billion annual surpluses?
No. They have the choice of doing that now and they dont.

What if Wages Went Up at the Rate of the Stock Market?

What would now be the reaction of the stock market if over the last decade wages had increased at the rate of stocks—and the stocks at the rate of wages?
Wages increase slower by default due to the increase being "permanent". Its really hard to cut wages without losing workers. This is why they love cheap immigrant labor. It undercut wage increases and lowers the collective QOL.
Is the Trump Agenda Bad Economic News?
Maybe. If he does cut spending, there will be an adverse reaction. To put it bluntly the economy needs to crash hard. The longer we put it off, the worse it'll be when it happens.
Was the Biden Record Preferable?
No, not unless you wish to be a debt slave. The system must continually print more and more to meet an ever increasing list of obligations. That means the wage suppression, the inflation, and deficits would have to become worse in order to keep us just where we are. In other words every year would become harder and harder just to stay afloat.
Why the Negotiations and Why Now?
The best time to start was 20 years ago, the second best is today.
 
Back
Top Bottom