US Target, Citing Theft, to Close Nine Stores - News follows recent Rite Aid bankruptcy announcement

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/business/target-store-closures-theft.html
Archive: https://archive.ph/JAeMX
Target press announcement: https://corporate.target.com/press/...t-Closes-Select-Stores-to-Prioritize-Team-Mem

Target, Citing Theft, to Close Nine Stores​

The retailer will close locations in New York, San Francisco, Seattle and Portland, saying its business had been hurt and the safety of employees and customers was at risk.

By Jordyn Holman
Sept. 26, 2023, 3:00 p.m. ET

Target announced on Tuesday that it was closing nine stores across four states, saying theft at the locations was harming its business and threatening the safety of employees and customers.
The stores being closed next month include one in Manhattan’s East Harlem, which has been open since 2010, and multiple locations in San Francisco, Seattle and Portland, Ore.

“We know that our stores serve an important role in their communities, but we can only be successful if the working and shopping environment is safe for all,” the retailer said in a statement.
In recent months, Target has been vocal on the topic of theft within its stores, particularly about organized retail crime, in which a large amount of merchandise is stolen with the aim of its being sold on the black market.

While speaking on an earnings call in August, Target’s chief executive, Brian Cornell, said that the company “continues to face an unacceptable amount of retail theft and organized retail crime.” He said that in the first five months of the year, thefts in its stores that involved violence or threats of violence rose 120 percent.

Executives at other retailers like Macy’s and Dick’s Sporting Goods have also been warning Wall Street about the impact theft is having on their business.
On Tuesday, the National Retail Federation released its annual survey of big brands, which found that the average rate of shrink — the industry term for the value of merchandise that disappears from stores without being paid for, through theft, damage and inventory tracking mistakes — increased to 1.6 percent of sales in 2022, from 1.4 percent in 2021. The average rate of shrink was 1.6 percent in 2019 and 2020.
Thirty-six percent of shrink comes from theft, according to the survey, while 29 percent of it is attributed to employee theft. Twenty-seven percent came from process, control failures and errors, according to the survey.

Although the rate of shrink remains similar to what it was in 2019 and 2020, some retailers are saying they find theft a greater cause for concern. This year, two-third of respondents said they were seeing even more violence and aggression from those participating in organized retail crime.

In May, Michael Fiddelke, Target’s chief financial officer, said if the shrink trend continued, the retail chain would lose $500 million in profit. The company has also been spending more on security, including using third-party guard services.

Some unions that represent retail workers have said that store workers have faced more instances of unruly customers and various acts of crime, including assaults, on the job since the start of the pandemic.
But some in the industry caution that there isn’t enough reliable data around the topic. Retailers often talk more about shrink during times of economic distress, analysts say, when their profits are already being squeezed. Retailers also don’t always report crimes in their stores, making it difficult to know how often they are occurring.
There have also been some retailers who later say that their concerns about shoplifting were overblown. That was the case with Walgreens, which said in January that “maybe we cried too much last year” about the issue of theft.

Executives, who have talked publicly about theft and organized retail crime, have said that they need help from government officials and law enforcement to solve what they see as a widespread problem. Target said it called on officials to support a bill in Congress that would create a task force of federal agencies to address retail crime. It said it was also hosting store walks with various government officials, including members of Congress, state legislators and local community partners, to educate them on how the company was trying to address the issue.
Target has said the safety of its employees has been threatened in other ways this year. In June, the company adjusted its Pride Month displays in some locations by moving some of its merchandise to the back of the store after it said workers were getting screamed at by customers.

On Tuesday, Target emphasized that while it was closing some of its stores, there were other locations nearby for people to shop. It said “eligible team members” would be offered jobs at other Target locations.

Store closings will take place on Oct. 21.

Jordyn Holman is a business reporter, covering the retail industry and consumer behavior. More about Jordyn Holman

1695761883223.png



Previous, similar posts:
 
I love that pic. It makes me laugh, because I was in Eastern Europe this last summer and although not the norm, and there were kiosks with drink and beer left unlocked at night, still enticingly lit up, outdoor restaurants the same, along with easily stealable hard alcohol, furniture, and umbrellas, and nobody apparently stole anything. And these were places with GYPSIES. Niggers can't even control themselves in a store.
came here to post this. It's not unusual to see cars running with windows down, keys in the ignition while the owner goes in the shop to buy fags and beer.

Coffee machines and parks in pristine condition in villages that have less accumulative wealth than the average western family.
 
Oakland Target slated to close saw 105 calls to police this year
San Francisco Chronicle (archive.ph)
By Rachel Swan
2023-09-28 01:09:48GMT

When it opened four years ago, Oakland’s only Target store was part of a neighborhood revival in a scrappy part of downtown dominated by auto dealerships and supply shops.

But this year it apparently became a casualty of rising crime that resulted in more than 100 calls to 911. Now the department store and pharmacy is among nine Targets across the country — including three in the Bay Area — that are scheduled to close next month.

“This is gonna crush a lot of people,” said Francesca Narro, who was among a dozen customers lined up outside the store Tuesday morning. Like many residents, she finds the location convenient — right in the middle of Auto Row, and within walking distance of the 19th and 12th Street BART stations. Narro often stops by after dropping her child off at daycare.

The store at 2650 Broadway is set to shut its doors on Oct. 21, along with eight other Target retailers in four states. Company representatives blamed retail theft for the decision, saying it caused the store to lose income while threatening the safety of employees and shoppers.

From Jan. 1 to Wednesday, police responded to 105 calls for service from the 2650 Broadway location — for issues ranging from a hit-and-run outside, to people behaving erratically, to loud arguments, to alarms going off after hours, to burglaries, according to a law enforcement source who reviewed the dispatch records.

“That’s pretty high, but that’s what we’re starting to see,” said Rachel Michelin, president of the California Retailers Association. She noted that Target has been “proactive in calling law enforcement” in an effort to get a more accurate record of how much theft the stores are enduring.

Oakland has seen crime surging in many categories this year, including a 33% rise in robberies and a 39% increase in burglaries. On Tuesday, at least 163 businesses went on strike, demanding state and federal resources to combat crime. Many merchants were infuriated after city officials missed a grant deadline for millions of state dollars to prevent organized retail theft.

Staff in the Oakland city administrator’s office said they are “working every day to strengthen community safety for our residents, small businesses and visitors,” in a statement that included a list of recent public safety efforts. Among them: more walking police patrols in merchant corridors, a $2.5 million upgrade to the 911 system and a new grant program to drive foot traffic in shopping districts.

Nonetheless, city leaders have faced scorching criticism, and pressure is mounting.

“We know that our stores serve an important role in their communities, but we can only be successful if the working and shopping environment is safe for all,” spokespeople for Target said in a statement Tuesday that announced the store closures.

Other retailers have said they were forced to close Bay Area stores due to crime. Walgreens shuttered five San Francisco stores two years ago, though the timing of the closures led city leaders to question the pharmacy giant’s complaints about theft. In 2017 and 2019 Walgreens had announced consolidation plans to shareholders, saying it would shut down hundreds of stores nationwide.

In Oakland, which had only one Target to serve more than 400,000 residents, the loss stings. Opened in 2019, the two-floor 2650 Broadway store seemed to mirror the life cycle of the city. It arrived as part of an effort to transform the Valdez Triangle District into an urbane boulevard with housing over storefronts. Construction cranes were crowding the downtown skyline, making way for new housing, office towers and commercial projects.

Yet according to the company, the store is beset by a wave of thefts and burglaries that has engulfed Oakland shopping corridors in recent months.

“It’s unfortunate,” Target customer Sean Moss said as he waited for the store to open on Tuesday with his 2-year-old daughter in tow. They had walked over to shop after the girl’s dentist appointment, also lured by the central location.

Despite their misgivings, Moss and Narro said they understand the company’s rationale.

“I see people grabbing stuff” off the shelves, Narro said, adding that thieves will feign as though heading for the cash register, then sneak out the exit instead.

Spokespeople for Target said in the statement that the company had invested in various security measures, including hiring guards, locking up merchandise and training employees in self-protection and de-escalation.

Some of those strategies were on display Tuesday at the Oakland store, where three guards in tactical vests huddled in a corner near the checkout line, along with an employee in a yellow vest. Items such as toothpaste, razors, deodorant, wipes and facial cleansers were locked in glass cases, requiring customers to ring a bell for a store worker to open them. A pickup truck from International Protective Service security company sat parked outside.

But if the store was awash in protective infrastructure, it also bore battle scars, with one of its front windows boarded up.
 
If only there was a common factor in all these stores closing. if only there was a pattern to see. this stochastic crime has people baffled. I cant imagine what kind of people would do this.
 
Just gonna put an aside that in my State, Target has TWO stores in areas with socio economic issues. But our Government is Republican, and told the Democrat Mayor they were fully "understanding" as to why safety was so hard in the inner city. That was why they established a State Police division in the city and had troopers "support" the local PD.

From my perspective though, the State Troopers were the only cops actually doing anything in the "Socio-Economic" areas. The city PD would just run through the projects doing fuck all, and the only time I saw lights on and someone pulled over was if it was a State trooper. Needless to say this urban center still has its Targets.

What's funny is they didn't even complain about the State Police taking over the socio-economic areas. Because it meant they didn't have to take responsibility for it. Absolutely wild.
 
Funny, all the Targets, Rite Aids, etc. in my boring midwest town are all going strong without having to chain the ice cream freezers shut.
 
Probably because your boring Midwestern town isn't filled with niggers and junkies.
We actually have a decent amount of blacks, they just aren't feral and neither is anyone else because the law here is enforced and people respect it. Can't speak for junkies, though.
 
I'm shocked Rite Aid is still around after all these years! I kinda figured they were going to go out of business when I worked there around the early to mid 00's! Every day someone was stealing booze at least once.
 
Everyone who has stayed in these cities deserves what's happening to them. Maybe not the children, but all of the adults. If you live in these cities and stood by and watching this all happen, and you didn't immediately start making plans to leave, if you didn't realize the inevitability of what I realized from hundreds of miles away? Then you have it coming.
I wouldn't go as far as to say everyone living in cities like Portland or Seattle deserve it. There is a good 15-20% of the population who are vocal about wanting to change things and are voting to do so but are completely swamped by the dominate leftie cult. "Why not just move at that point?" they might have all their family and friends there, own a businesses there or just really love the city they grew up in and want it to get better. Not everyone is just cool with abandoning their home.
 
I can't wait to experience the future of shopping in inner-city America:
View attachment 5364968

Dayum... They used to just chain them to the wall. Guess that's not working anymore.

When these stores close the community loses jobs. All these junkies and hoodrats stealing like crazy are making their communities worse. The lowest dregs of society seem determined to drag everyone down with them.

Reminder that the dreaded urban "food deserts" exist because blacks are so violent towards store owners and steal so much that businesses are forced to either get private security which is very expensive or leave the area. So they leave and then there is nowhere to get food. This is true to the point where the food desert article on heavily leftist controlled Wikipedia even mentions it. blacks are so lacking in impulse control they will rob and loot to the point where they can't even have places to buy food from. Subhuman behavior.

View attachment 5365732

I live in one of these food deserts. If I want to go to a big supermarket I have to walk a few miles or take a bus to a nicer neighborhood. There are some decent mom & pops here run by no nonsense immigrants. But even those are starting to make everyone check their bags at the counter.

Walgreens has a constable a few days a week. They're stretched kind of thin across the stores so we can't have one every day. But I've seen a fair number of arrests and people told to leave the store because they were caught shoplifting previously. The people who steal always scream the loudest about how innocent they are.
 
I wouldn't go as far as to say everyone living in cities like Portland or Seattle deserve it. There is a good 15-20% of the population who are vocal about wanting to change things and are voting to do so but are completely swamped by the dominate leftie cult. "Why not just move at that point?" they might have all their family and friends there, own a businesses there or just really love the city they grew up in and want it to get better. Not everyone is just cool with abandoning their home.
They choose, every day, to keep living in a city that's being run into the ground by politicians they either vote for or who they know damn well won't be defeated by voting against them in a place run by cartel politics. You can visit a city to see family and friends. You're taking a massive risk to run a business in a place where feral junkies and "just an idea" Antifags can destroy your livelihood with no legal repercussions, and the business owners know it, so that risk is on the business owners. And "this is my home" means nothing when your home is being destroyed by violent nogs the local D.A. won't prosecute. It's obvious what is happening and what will happen, so how are these people not responsible for what eventually happens to them? Remember, there is no law to protect them anymore.

And any variation of "I've lived here X number of years, and I'm not giving up my home without a fight" means dick when you're doing nothing but propping up an institution that's rotten at its base. If even one of these people were going Deathwish on local criminals, I might have some regard for them. But people with families subjecting them to this shit? "You gotta understand, it's hard to find another job and move." Nah, fuck 'em.

I say that as someone with extended family in some of these cities. You choose to stay after what happened, and has been happening, since 2020? It's unfortunate, but you can't claim not to be responsible for the risk you're taking.
 
I live in one of these food deserts. If I want to go to a big supermarket I have to walk a few miles or take a bus to a nicer neighborhood. There are some decent mom & pops here run by no nonsense immigrants. But even those are starting to make everyone check their bags at the counter.

Walgreens has a constable a few days a week. They're stretched kind of thin across the stores so we can't have one every day. But I've seen a fair number of arrests and people told to leave the store because they were caught shoplifting previously. The people who steal always scream the loudest about how innocent they are.
I feel you. One of the saddest things I noticed in my city was the small row of houses next to the high-rises that were all built at some time during the last 20 years. The old people living there were probably among the few who refused to leave, only to watch the neighborhood they once identified with and called home transform from a community into a collection of concrete blocks. It seems in many other areas, the effect is not a transformation of architecture, but one of demographics, changing once prosperous communities full of families into dangerous ghettos with failing infrastructure and a dwindling economy. I know which one I'd rather have.

It seems the only way to return these areas to some semblance of normality and safety is a full-blown police state. Something the US government will have serious trouble creating since they basically left the cops to fend for themselves during the George Floyd riots.
 
What happens exactly when insurance companies stop offering coverage for theft? Because that's 100% going to happen.
 
What happens exactly when insurance companies stop offering coverage for theft? Because that's 100% going to happen.
I remember this happening to a place in Portland. Insurance covered the first few times they got robbed but after like the 5th it didn't anymore and they went out of businesses. One of the main leftist talking points during the 2020 riots was "lmao like who cares it will be covered by their insurance!" another leftie lie.
 
Back
Top Bottom