Tabletop Roleplaying Games (D&D, Pathfinder, CoC, ETC.)

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Can confirm, this one has been cooking for a while.

I still think we should do a good book occasionally, just to clean the taste of shit from our mouth.
At the very least we're going to do grab bags, since this book was pain (plus it'd really allow us to widen out). I'd love to do some semi-obscure good games or even just mediocre books.

For those wondering, this took over two weeks for a good reason: the original audio got corrupted, and even then I had audio balancing issues despite my efforts to make sure everyone was at an equal volume. I had to listen to and rebalance THE WHOLE FUCKING THING.
 
For those who run first edition Pathfinder, which splatbooks from 3.5 and 3rd party splatbooks do you allow?
Most of the splat books that would work well with Pathfinder were redone by great 3rd Party companies. Like Dreamscarred Press (Psionics, Martial Powers, and Chakra). In terms of 3.x books, just go with fluff and add Pathfinder crunch. If there's something you want to use and can't find, ask. My Pathfinder 3rd party folder is over 4700 files.

I should mention some ideas in the Sand, Frost and Ocean books are pretty useful and so are the Cityscape and Dungeonscape books. Though if you want a sea campaign I'd go with the Alluria books. If you don't mind conversion work, you can use the RGG (Rogue Genius Games) monster book The Genius Guide to the Talented Bestiary and convert Monster Manual monsters.

Other books to check in on. Spell Compendium and Item Compendium. Be sure to check Pathfinders splat books to see if there's no counterpart. Best way to do that is the check the d20pfsrd.

If you want to keep track of not only your campaign but the books and any info you're using in your game, try Realmworks. I may or may not have everything for Fantasy Grounds too.
 
Last edited:
Can confirm, this one has been cooking for a while.

I still think we should do a good book occasionally, just to clean the taste of shit from our mouth.

Hmm, how 'bout checking out some of the campaign setting boxed sets from AD&D? It'd be neat to do a compare and contrast of how certain iconic settings like Forgotten Realms, Ravenloft, and Greyhawk started out compared to how they would eventually end up in later editions like 3.5 and 5e.
 
Can confirm, this one has been cooking for a while.

I still think we should do a good book occasionally, just to clean the taste of shit from our mouth.
If you want an "interesting" game to review I suggest The Watch which was written by non-binary trans misandrist where "toxic" masculinity is an evil, corruptible force that has wiped out most of the men. While @Wallace covers parts of it, I'd like to see you guys' take on it.
 
If you want an "interesting" game to review I suggest The Watch which was written by non-binary trans misandrist where "toxic" masculinity is an evil, corruptible force that has wiped out most of the men. While @Wallace covers parts of it, I'd like to see you guys' take on it.

I'll have a go with it. Link for those following along at home. Full disclosure most of my game riffing experience comes from lurking Fatal and Friends.

The Watch

The others don't look like they went over this mechanically, so I'll try and hit that a bit more. The first thing to note is that on the third page we get a mostly blank "Acknowledgments" including :

The Watch is Powered by the Apocalypse

Many of you nerds probably know the Apocalypse World system. For those wondering the implications it means that they didn't home brew their own rules, the ripped off a generalist rule-set where they only have to make moves to fit in the pre-established framework. I've had some friends try to make AW games work but was never really a fan myself, just know that any of the "surprisingly solid rules" noted in other reviews are likely due to them having nothing to do with making the rules.

As a general skimthrough the art ranges from "meh" to "Actually pretty good", while the character design has some issues I don't really blame the artist for that one. You occasionally see "This is clearly a Tumblr self insert" type characters with way too many earrings and a modern haircut, but for the most part move the art to a different book and it would all be perfectly serviceable. Likewise the format looks decent, its pretty simple but easy to navigate.

Cutting into the meat and potatoes we're dropped into backstory. We get a couple of looooooooong sentences that should probably be broken up (a sin I myself am guilty of whenever I try to write), such as;

Watching the Watcher part 1.png


The paragraph before and after feels like it had looooooong sentences like this that got broken up by the editor (the first has something like "Those that X. Those that Y. And those that Z). The budget that didn't go into art or editing went into commas. As you can see some words are bolded. I am not sure why, given that they seem to have gotten extra words trapped in whenever they bold something.

So we get into the backstory. The Shadow attacked our diverse land and the Watch has a "No Boys Allowed!" sign posted on the door.

It should be noted that a lot of the art has what are clearly manly men fighting despite that "It hits Men the most!" thing. I guess the Great Representation of Toxic Masculinity respects people's pronouns, theoretically any man could fight on the frontlines just by saying he isn't 100% cis. The basic backstory is followed by some dude fighting a creature from the black lagoon with a sword, if you didn't already know that this was the No Boys Allowed game you'd probably be pretty confused by the difference between the art and text.

Which we finally get introduced to on the next page! While the layout is acceptable, this is the second-time-that-the-writer-made-words-like-this-causing-the-word-to-be-split-up-over-a-line-break. You can again see the weird bolding here, starting at half a word in:

Watching the Watcher part 1.png


Now we get into the Gender tag. "This is a story about woman and nonbinary people" - everyone except for dudes. Lets keep this in mind in case they change their mind later. They're taking the spot light from traditional males roles! Like RPG protagonist! I can't hear you mumbling something about being able to choose your own gender over the sound of my deep conversation about "toxic ideas of gender". It doesn't tell me what that means, but I assume it has something to do with why you want to throw up whenever they try to bring up gender here.

Gender Options:
You know how you can make your character be whatever you want in most RPGs? NOT HERE! You have these options to choose from:
Cis Woman: "Originally assumed to be a girl, but now identify as a woman"
Transwoman: "Originally assumed to be a boy or man, but now identifies as a woman"

I'm sure those of you who went to college for Gender studies understand that the above two options are technically one gender, but the game takes the time to inform you that they are totally different.

Fluids: Identify as whatever. You currently identify as a man, will identify as a man until the Shadow is dealt with, but occasionally identify as female? Shadow can't touch you. Its in the rules. Totally a loophole if you want to have an all-currently-identifying-as-male party for a troll game or something.

Non-binary: Not male or female. Including having no gender! Lucky you can combine everything else into this category so you don't need to -

Genderqueer: People who identify as Genderqueer. Which...doesn't....fit under Non-binary apparently. It has to be its own category. Suck it agender.

Next we get a paragraph on "Gender Presentation" saying "Gender is how you feel, Presentation is how you look", finishing up this riveting discussion with links to blog posts on gender.

Now we ask the real questions, something I've honestly been asking myself:

Watching the Watcher part 1.png


We're all woman*, so why does gender option matter? Because our stupid players will just pic straight woman like weebs playing a magical girl game and that won't do. Check your privileged.

*2/5 of the options presented are woman. Everything is -very loudly- not a woman. It has thus far not really thought any of its gender nonsense through, despite being 90% gender nonsense.

Next we get a paragraph on how the Shadow cares about your feelings. It isn't some sex based disease, that is trans erasure bigot.

Another fair question, you want us to play genderspecials. How are genderspecials treated in this society so we know how to roleplay them? "However you want them to be treated lol what do you expect me to actually write the setting". Make your characters super oppressed if you want to milk the pity, make them super accepted if you want them to be beloved by all.

Then we find something rare, an actually valid question with an actually valid answer! "How do I play someone with a gender different than mine, and what if I screw it up?" the answer is something like "Don't worry about it too much. Just play them like you would any other character based on their background and motivations", which is fair enough.

The artist made a really cool looking map that is really sparse on details. 90% is hills with like three objects drawn in the valley below it, I couldn't see using this in any practical way.

Now that we got past Gender, it is on to the Rules. We get more weird bolding here (they for some reason wanted to emphasize that you can play with single sided sheets if you don't have access to double sided), and a basic outline of the Apocalypse World rules. They do the Standard Gamemaster Name Change to..."Mistress of Ceremonies", and we are helpfully informed that Character Creation will take a brief hour and a half to finish. We then get a full page to kinda-explain the Xcard just in case things get too real for you man.

Alright now for the rules. Probably. The section says Stats and Moves but it has broken my trust before. We get four stats, Cunning (Int), Luck, Training (I guess Strength and Toughness are too masculine. Dainty ladies have to earn their Stats!), and Valour (I will be cutting the U out as an American.) Stats cap out at +/- 3 on a six-sided dice. "Moves are covered in the next chapter" so my distrust of the heading is valid. I won't fall for your lies again, The Watched!

Harm And Healing: See Harm and Healing - Why put something here just to direct me somewhere else? If this ends up being recursive Imma be mad.

Advancement: We have two experience trackers (what gaming group doesn't love bookkeeping?), Experience and Jaded. It sounds like Exp is Exp, Jaded is Sans points that are also EXP. Five EXP points of etheir type lets you Advance/Level UP. Experience can be gained by using moves you selected at the beginning of the game (for some reason), completing missions (unless it decides to award you 0), or by running over your Friendship stat cap. You can also turn Friendship into EXP if a Friend dies, for 3/5ths of a level up! Keep that in mind munchkins, and remember the most valuable resource of all is each other. Jaded is like experience points, but edgier. You gain more of it by doing two things that the game doesn't bother to tell us about yet, completing missions, presumably by using Jaded moves, and optionally with the Friend Dying thing.

Friendship is Magic(Alternatively, we're Fireemblem now): You have Friendship points called "Camaraderie" that you get from moves. You can use it for a small boost, as can NPCs, but given how topoff turns to EXP you're probably going to do that instead.

What, that isn't enough trackers for you to keep track of? How about we add Weary to the list! Lets see, between the two EXP and Weary, you have three trackers per character. Camaraderie is linked between two characters, so you will functionally have N+2 trackers assuming any interaction between characters. So with 2 non-GM players you get 4 trackers per character, a larger table with 5 players would get you a whopping 7 trackers for each character. Luckily as I stressed above players love book keeping, so they'll only hope they can get more players and more trackers! Where was I? Right, Weary. Wearness is a 4-box tracker that you can roll whenever you feel like it, or when it fills up. Roll to lose Friendship points! That is it. If you succeed you throw a fit and your friends don't like you anymore. What a fun mechanic. Yay. As stated above it mostly acts as a small boost or EXP fodder, so gameplay wise it mostly just shuts down your progression. Fluff wise you are encouraged to act like a jerk to your fellow players, something that always goes well whenever a game suggests this.

The next heading section says "Moves", but I'm remaining skeptical for now. We get an intro to how the dice system works (2d6, 7-9 partial success, 10+ full success). Some terminology to define bonuses and penalties. Now we get on to the basic moves! Are you ready to see how we'll be fighting the evil Shadow taking over our homeland like on all the art?

Too bad, fighting is masculine. Woman are about having tantrums, not solving problems silly. The moves are all emotional actions. The first introduced is Blow Off Steam, where your character goofs off instead of doing things. Get +1 Friendship point, discover something, get +1 to your next roll, or get -1 Weariness! That is in addition to the fabulous default of -1 weariness! That is right. The only thing this move serves to do is move some of your many, many trackers around, give you a small boost, or demand the GM move the plot forward. Next we get Need A Hand, where you use your womanly wiles and Friendship points to demand someone help you with something. +1 to a roll per Friendship point spent up to the maximum of 3, and may be added after the roll is performed. That last part makes it fairly noticeably, since it is adding a sure success, but remember you are effectively burning EXP to use it. Now on our very pink and frilly feminine Platter is Open Up to Someone! This brave action of making yourself vulnerable takes Valor to do. And the results are...basically the same as Blow off Steam. Replace "Move Plot Forward" with "They Must Promise you something/Tell you what they are thinking". Something you could just ask if you where a Man, but your feminine nature prevents you from doing so. It allows the player you Open Up to the option to respond with respect or compassion, their choice of either! Nothing says effective role playing like being told what to do and how to react. The Promise you make has no mechanical effect at all, in case you where thinking of a way to abuse that. Roll to make empty promise! Now here is one that you might be able to use to actually fight something - Manipulation aka Provoke Someone! Make a roll and if you succeed, they give you the reaction you're hoping for! On a partial success, they do something else! What else? Anything else! Of course you can't force a PC to do what you want (this isn't Opening Up), but you can give them a carrot by granting them a free Experience Point if they do what you want them to! Weirdly a full success grants weariness if they refuse while a partial doesn't, so the only thing a full success gets you on PCs is a chance to ruin your friendship. It is also rolled by luck, Charisma and people abilities arn't feminine enough. People's reactions to your actions are completely random and only being lucky will change that. One of the examples is to keep someone from attacking, so lets keep that in mind for later.

The with-character example is a PC telling NPCs that there might be a spy and they should investigate. A partial success leads to them torturing the person they accused of being a spy. So you have the "Make False Accusations" skill necessary to fully play a feminine character! How progressive! Good thing you can Prevent Bloodshed. Yep, totally something you can do with Provoke, I know. But this one is rolled with Training! And it comes with automatic side effects! That is right, if you roll a 10+ you only have to choose one drawback - such as "You are the only one that gets hurt", "You Insult Someone", "The Instigator Gets Away With It", "They Think You're Playing Sides". And here we get a neat little note for you combat junkies:

Watching the Watcher part 1.png


So you want to do violence? In a game centered around defending the land from a shadowy unambiguously evil force? You have one Move. Otherwise it ain't my problem. Lets get back to painting each other's nails around the campaign fire. Speaking of Rely On Your Training, that is next! It has the helpful descriptor of Try Something, if you hit do it if you partial hit the GM thinks of something. Its specifically said to be the jack-of-all trades "You want to do something but we didn't make a move for it". The Last two moves are Let the Shadow In, Make the GM give you information, and Look Beyond, make the GM give you information but specifically about nearby people or the current situation.

All in all, the basic moves look like they're attempting to remove the "Role-playing" from RPGs. Normally you don't need points to tell you that your characters became better friends after a party, but apparently this game decided that it wants to put numbers to that fluffy stuff.

I'm almost done this post, but the long awaited Harm and Healing chapter we where promised earlier has arrived! How do we get and take harm when everything so far has been playing truth or dare at the barracks sleep over? You have three Health States not counting "Not Currently Harmed", and a "Source of Harm" gets you one or two points. If you take 4+ points, you Roll to Not Die. NPCs don't bother with that nonsense and don't have a health track (at least that doesn't give us another track to keep track of...). Healing is Luck Based (Imagine paying for medical school lmoa), and you always heal if you take the heal action with a generic "the GM decides something goes bad!" if you fail the roll. The "Roll to not Die" called "Suffer Great Harm" either contradicts what it said earlier or I misread and didn't care enough to check, in that getting 3 Harms is now enough to make you roll it. If you 10+, "Suffer harm as the MC feels appropriate". Partial success choose from a list of "Lose 1 stat, Lose a Level Up, or get Maimed". A failure can either die or choose all 3, so you're basically immortal as long as you don't mind playing a worthless stub. And lets face it, if you're playing this game unironically that would just make it a self insert.

I'll stop it there for now. Maybe I'll tackle more of the book later.
 
Whatever, I don't have anything else going on. Lets keep going.

We got the six main Moves, now we move on to the ...9 Secondary moves. I'll mostly gloss over them unless something interesting comes up. No wait, I'll have to cover them later because despite being brought up now Mission Moves don't get covered until Missions! Ugh. Alright, it gives us the "Hardship Moves". First up is Resist The Shadow. If you engage in "toxic behavior", the Shadow attempts to take over! You succeed, it doesn't. You kinda succeed, you get a Weary/Jaded/Harm point (The game really likes to hand Jaded out like its a bad thing, when it really hasn't been thus far.). You fail, it takes you over. More interestingly we get a definition for "toxic behavior" that lets the Shadow take you over!

I say "more interestingly", but perhaps I have looked too long into the abyss and become a liar myself. It just says "toxic masculinity", a concept that doesn't seem to exist in the game world given that nobody seems to have a problem fielding an army without a single man in it, which doesn't really...clear up anything at all. The examples are doing things like "Macho Challenge of status" (Possibly like the characters did in the "Blow off Steam" example where they had a friendly archery contest that was portrayed positively?), "Trying to resolve problems through violence" (Maybe the reason we don't have any fighting moves is that engaging the enemy in combat immediately lets them possess you?), "Asserting Dominance through Intimidation" (One of the examples for the "Spend Friend Points to Help" thing was two people Intimidating a mob to back down). So three things we saw at least one example character doing and being portrayed in a positive light are all very bad toxic behaviors that should be avoided. It lists some "female" behavior like gossip or calling a chick fat, ugly, or easy. It lists some fairly harsh penalties for failure like "you let the enemy army into your compound", with the character example being that the PC got possessed and stabbed another PC. That is right! Act "Toxic" and demons will take over and make you kill the rest of the party. Be nice or else.

We get more rules for Weariness, or rather the rules for Surrendering to Weariness. Which are the same. We also get a repost of the "Recite a Eulogy" rules noting that you also lose weariness if you manage to pass. For some reason this is rolled for Training, I guess they teach you how to attend funerals in The Watch. It notes that you only lose weariness once even if multiple people died (sorry Munchkins).

"Start Session" looks like it will take longer than I planned. It is basically a "Go on a mission!" skill. Say what your mission is and any secondary objectives, assign them jobs (and yes, apparently jobs. Of the "three" you assign, one is "Recon and Lookout", and another is "Navigate and Strategize". ) You think we're finally describing all the violence you're doing to the enemy during this? Nope. You're supposed to describe a montage of character interaction that you had during the mission. Maybe we'll talk about what actually happens on the mission in a hundred pages or so.

"End Session" is also apparently a move, but it is just when you give out Friend Points to whoever you want. The character example mentions "angry sex". Its bolded along with a bunch of other words that probably where not meant to be.

And that is the end for moves! Now we get to move on to Characters! This game knows what is important. First Gender stuff, then rules, then characters as it should be.

Time yourself as we begin the infamous 90 minute character creation! We start off with the Character's twitter bio, including their name, pronouns, and "demeanor". You get to choose a name! And by choose, I mean pick one from a list. One listed in the playbook. Then you get to choose one of the genders. There are no incorrect choices (except for male)! It list "options" for demeanor without explain what those are or what it is, so I can only assume you get the option to pick that from a list as well. Look at all that freedom you have!

Next you get to pick your gear. It does nothing.

You can then pick your rank. If you go too high you lose the character. Power is too masculine, can't have that! The highest rank gets to pick out the missions, otherwise it doesn't really do anything.

There is a paragraph telling you that you'll make Bonds for free Frendship points. Later. Not now. We bring it up now for no particular reason. You also choose a clan. Also not now. We have to tell you what the clans are first. Also the clans have been disbanded lol.

Starting stats are pre-defenined based on your playbook. But you get to add +1 to a stat! That is having control over your character.

"Player Principals" are just cheesy lines there to fill space, and include "keep an eye on each other's emotional safety" implying that this is something you need to do out-of-character. The Playbook Agendas basically give your character's Harry Potter House, with a "Be X and X" character traits. You then get to choose 2 moves! Unless you are Spider. Then you get one. The other one is assigned to you. Right in the middle of character creation it tells the GM to make a bunch of NPCs to fill out the squad. Now the Friend Point assignment we where promised earlier can begin! Pick a line from a Playbook. Put someone's name on it. Write down your many, many totals.

Now we get the "Clan Questions", finally open ended questions and not picking something off the list. Each clan has two questions that the player is asked about for Worldbuilding, such as "What Great Hero game from this clan"? The questions vary in how broad the answer can be. There is only so many ways one can answer "What Ancient Mountain Fortress do they hold?" that can add to the world, while "Why is your clan indispensable to the others" can be answered thousands of ways.

The GM then asks players a bunch of similar questions. It says "At least one", but every bullet point has like three questions after the first. All seem to be about the clans and most seem to try to add some edginess to them. Your clan could stop the Shadow, why didn't they? Your clan got wiped out lol who do you blame and where did you bury the bodies? Again some seem like they could be valid open-ended worldbuilding, others have strict leading questions who's answer doesn't really do much for the world.

The First Session checklist suggests the first thing you should do is introduce your name and pronouns to the group. Given this is on page 67 a group going through character creation for the first time won't even read it until they're halfway done character creation. Most of it restates character creation, adding some steps that emphatically where not there. They put it at the end of character creation, where you won't know where it is unless you've gone through the book before. It really sure have been at the beginning if you wanted to use it at all.

So now we get into Playbooks. The things that you need to make a character and should have picked out already. Each has three words describing the type of player who would like it and what they can do, half of them sound like jerks. "Likes provoking those around them", "Like putting other PCs in harm's way", "Likes being self-centered".

Up to now I've been assuming that the playbooks where...actually third party books, but no. They're printed here. You get to choose between difficult choices as having "Common Clothing, Well-Worn Clothing, Patched Clothing, or Dull Clothing"! How will you ever decide? You probably spend the first forty five of the 90 minutes making that choice alone. All the choice are "Pick 1 or 2 words from this very short list", generally pretty restricting if you just stay with the rules as written. The "Ties That Bind" mentioned earlier are all one-liners like "X did me a big favor" or "I defended X from insult". It would definitely get repetitive if you wanted to replay this game at all.

Each clan has much simpler Moves, some of which are just modifications to the Basics, and they are allowed to choose 2 at player creation. I'll just pick out some of the sillier ones:
Cooler Heads Prevail (Bear): Roll to tell someone they're acting foolishly. They get to Listen, Attack You, or Not Listen (and take a -2 penalty)! That is right, for one of your choices you can force your comrades to attack you, or put them in greater danger! If you succeed in the roll!
Build Up to It(Eagle): Brag about yourself to get a bonus to Opening Up. Makes it auto succeed and counts partials as full success.
Wrapped Around My Finger (Jaded Eagle): Auto 10+ Provoke. Can be chosen after rolling. Mark Jaded to use.
To Die For(Jaded Eagle): Mark Jaded. Someone else takes harm meant for you.
Protecting Spirits:(Jaded Fox): Mark Jaded instead of Harm. Gain a form of experience point from taking damage.
On the Prowl (Lioness): Get EXP and Friendship Points for "Moments of Physical intimacy". Sleep your way to the top! It later notes you only get the benefit once per person. So you have to sleep with everyone for limitless power.
Told Ya So(Owl): Give -2 to a comrade who ignores your advice. You later get a Friendship point (worth +1) or lose Weariness after you rub it in their face. Totally worth it?
That Looks Fun(Jaded Owl): Take Jaded and use someone else's non-jaded moves. Just put that here for the munchkins.
Divine Agent(Raven): Worship a deity from a list. You can ask the GM a questions about it and get +1 based on the answer. The deities are things like "Love and sex", "Death", "Art", so you're probably going to have to go with one like "War" if you actually want to use this. And can get past the "no violence" thing.
We Too Few(Raven): Get twice as many points when your friends die!
Final Blessing(Jaded Raven): Mark Jaded to get a boost when your friends die. Not particularly notable except it comes right before
Miracle(Jaded Raven): Mark Jaded to have a friend succeed a failed Don't Die roll. So by taking Final Blessing you're just deliberately letting your comrades die I guess. Probably for the sweet 2X EXP.
Hidden Motives(Spider): Give -2 to a comrade. On a partial you expose yourself to fire. It could possibly supposed to be used on NPCs, but NPCs don't even have stats so far.
Dark Whispers(Jaded Spider): Mark Jaded to know what your comrade's deepest fears are! Remember, being straightforward and asking is masculine.
No Bridges Burnt(Wolf): Watcher means rolling to say "I'm Sorry". If you hit, they accept and you get things! Fail and they don't and you lose things.
Unleash The Wolf(Wolf): THE ONE COMBAT MOVE! Roll to do Harm. Roll well and deal more harm or take something from them. Since gear is just pretty accessories, go with the deal more harm option. On a partial success, you take harm lol.
Learned From the Best(Wolf Jaded): Pick a jaded move from another class. You only get one.
Sniff Em Out (Wolf Jaded): Mark Jaded to...ask...someone how they're feeling. Buy the move to make casual conversation! They must answer you honestly, so no brushing you off with "I'm Fine"!

Small note on those OP Jaded moves, like I said Jaded is basically a second EXP tract. The downside is that the last Jaded move is "You die", and you have to pick it if you run out of all other options. Since there are 4 other options, it takes 25 Jaded to lose the character barring choosing one at the start. Unless you're playing a long campaign you should basically be able to take as much Jaded as you want, especially if you start managing it after you get all the good skills in the tract.

Many of these moves - including those that cause harm- are meant to be done on other players. The Wolf's combat skill has notes stating what happens to other players if used on in a way that suggests it is totally meant to be used on them. It seems weird, normally when you get "Fireball" you are supposed to use it on the bad guys. I get that they're trying to focus on character interaction but they don't really do that very well. It moves everything to dice. If the Wolf comes along and gives a genuine, heartfelt apology and they roll poorly then nope your character doesn't get to accept it screw them. I listed most of the under/overpowered ones - some just give you and your comrades penalties for very little gain while others are "Get Free stuff and become immortal". This is especially common with combo moves, a Wolf with Learned from the best Protecting Spirits becomes the closest thing you can get in this game to a combat monster able to dish out and receive arbitrary amounts of damage.

GM's corner:
The bad guy is toxic masculinity and that is why you can't play men! You can't be a man and not be toxic and masculine. Its just not possible! Triggering Shadow possession is because you're behaving badly and not being a good feminist.
Agenda: At this point I'm sure that the random bolding is a printing error. Anyway this is mostly a generic "Do things, but let the player do things."
Principals: A set of rules that the GM "Must" follow. They range from "Dumb" (Make clan politics important! Also we dissolved the clans in the very little backstory we have lol) to "Generic but fine" (Sometimes, let someone else decide) with plenty of shoe-horned "RESPECT PEOPLE'S GENDER! MIRROR THE PATRIARCHY IN THE SHADOW". The longer versions get even rantier ("What? You want your character to be suspicious of a trans-woman since the shadow affects men? TRANS WOMAN ARE REAL WOMAN SHITLORD!")

A lot of the stuff in the middle was touchy feely, but despite being the main event the Toxic Masculinity stuff didn't really show up in the mechanisms. There is only one move to resist the shadow, all the rests are mostly interacting with specifically not-male party members leaving very little room for ranting.

GM Moves: They get put on a scale of "Hardness" ranging from something might happen to something urgent is happening. Well they say that, but then never really bring up the scale again so who knows. I'm not really familiar enough with the GM side of AW to say how typical this is, but they're really just GM things that boil down to "Make things happen". There isn't any roll suggestions, no way for the characters to avoid it. That is fine for things like "Make Monsters appear", since theoretically the player's reaction will be their own Moves. Inflict Harm is just...do an arbitrary amount of harm to whoever you want. Some of the moves are just silly like "Use Words Instead of Spears", the GM move to make NPCs say mean things! The next Section is on Adversaries, suggesting Threatening factions in addition to the Shadow such as Traditions, Radicals, and Innocent Civilians! Who needs to bother with lumbering magical mind control when these Innocent Men and Children are displaying Raw Pain?

Now we finally get to talk about what the heck the Shadow is. And it is another checklist. There is very little non-multiple-choice lore here. The check list for the shadow has a list of mostly mutually exclusive choices that you're supposed to pick two of, and some that should really be a part of it even if not chosen. Is it Technological and/or Magical? Is it Terror Inducing and/or Subtle? How about reality warping? We didn't bother to write that, so you pick one! What it actually wants is also multiple choice. All are basically the same "Its Toxic Masculinity!", so go nuts with that. You could basically make it the Reapers from Mass effect if you picked the less obvious options like Technological/Subtle Perfect Order/Disunity Among Enemies, but basically all of the motivations will play out the same. Likewise What it Does is yet another checklist that will end up working the same regardless given the minimal backstory. If you didn't choose "turn men into weapons", then it isn't like this particular shadow isn't targeting and taking over men to make its armies right? I briefly thought the answer was wrong when I turned the page and looked at the "Shadow's Servants" which included mutated Women, but as the text below it happily suggests that Men are the real enemy even if you picked the two Woman choices for its servants.

There is one page on NPCs, most of which was covered earlier. You get some more pages about "How not to trigger the special snowflakes playing this game" like fighting the fake patriarchy is too much for your players. Give trigger warnings to your players! If you suddenly reveal that the Shadow was Toxic Masculinity all along without telling people first it may give them the vapors! Don't assume your player actually read the description and knows what the game is about. What if a complicated series of missteps caused them to not know? Bet you didn't think of that.

We then get more blogposts, this time on how to be a SJW tabletop gamer! Then a bit of one-paragraph advice like "Make a shipping chart" and "Draw things on our empty map!"

Last but not least, "Missions!" how to actually play the game tucked waaaay in the back. They repost the Start of Session rules before telling us what all those positions actually mean. Watch Their Backs is a support job, you can give +1 to the people with real jobs! If you make your roll! Yay! Navigate/Strategize makes you mark a map or make a plan. If you succeed, everything goes well! If you fail, everything still goes well! You get one complication and Weary. Weary isn't much, these complications will have to be harsh for these rolls to mean anything. Recon/Lookout provides intel on a hit, a complication or a Weary on a partial, and two complications on failure. At Take Point you just always take a Complication, take a complication and Weary or Jaded on partial, and if you fail.....well you still succeed in the mission but you take two complications! And everyone takes Weary! The stakes have never been higher people!

The complications range in how bad they are pretty greatly. You got some harsher ones like "An NPC died!" (a handy way to kill off an NPC you don't like or who gives you sweeet EXP given players get to choose who it is if they take this option), to lesser choices like "Everyone Marks Weary!" or "I mark Weary and Jaded!". The stakes arn't particularly high, even in the worst possible outcome with the most killer game master possible you'd still have some of your squad left at the end and succeed in your mission. There is no way to fail. Every player gets one roll and then chooses what Complications they want from a list. The GM gets to pick for the worse rolls. That is the sum total of combat in this game. Success would be even more dull since you have one Complication to make a story of while the rest is just saying how you went through slaughtering the bad guys.

Did you think the GM and players where supposed to come up with missions? Nope! Another list! A couple side quests than a boss battle, it is kind enough to let you choose the order to fight them in. They are technically vague enough that you can make up the details on how and where the "Defend a fort!" mission takes places, but it isn't like there is a ton of variety with that. The Shadow Levels up once you get near the end, but the Shadow traits are just fluff so it doesn't really accomplish much lol.

It mentions how characters will rake up and get more NPCs as the campaign goes on. You can refuse if you want to be a small-scale team and nothing really changes.

I lied, it looks like the Shadow gets some actual power ups too. A free higher-tier complication can and will be used once per mission at the GM's choice. It includes things like "50% of the PCs roll to not die", though the rest are non-stated things like "A rebellion happens!". The PCs also get to make a "Change the World!" rule to change whatever they want about the world. If they get a partial, it only changes their clan. A failure also changes only the clan and makes the Shadow mad. It looks like your total levels of Jaded moves you've used as a bonus, so you'll probably succeed given how far in the campaign this is and how many Jaded moves you can make. There arn't any examples on what changes to make, which is fine since there really isn't anything telling you what society is like in the first place.

The Final Boss fight has special rules. And unlike Missions, it is an actual fight! At least you take out hit points by making Battle Moves instead of just winning, and failure doesn't fill anything in. These rules are probably more fun than the mission rules, though the consequences are still relatively low. I'd probably replace the Mission system with this battle system if I ever got possessed by the Shadow and forced to GM this game as a form of torture. You get a bunch of new moves that basically accomplish the same thing with different stats, roll to remove a Segment. Partial success removes a segment and has a consequence based on what you where trying to do. After you beat the Final Boss, roll to change society again! Hopefully it is a good one by now.

That is basically it. A page for acknowledgments and how to embarrass everyone at cons remain but don't look particularly entertaining.

In the end I'd place it a step above "Totally Unplayable". It walks a weird line between not giving you enough to work with and railroading you. It expects the GM and players to do most the heavy lifting, the lore basically ends at "Shadow and men are BAD! We had clans that did things but they're gone now!". At the same time it isn't a freeform game meant for the GM to write their own story, you're supposed to check all the boxes and follow the rails. Its like playing Mad Libs with a wordbank. It would be more fun if you either just wrote the words in and said "The Shadow is a magical thing, here are what its minions look like, here is how it acts" or went vaguer and let the GM write it themselves. As it stands the lore that is there just stands in for the very shallow premise of "All the PCs arn't men!" without really doing anything more than worldbuilding. The Shadow isn't a bad antagonist if you take out the couple of paragraphs ranting about how it was totally Toxic Masculinity, The Watch is basically trying to be a Bioware game and it has a Bioware villain to match. . All in all it felt like someone who is a fan of Bioware games but is one of those people who hates video games and plays on the easiest mode available just to do the character interaction things. It outright separates the character interaction scenes from the action, while it tells you to pick out some bonding scenes from the mission you do that afterwords rather than as you progress through it making them inherently separated. The actual gameplay is generic and faceless, it would take a talented GM to turn the missions into an interesting story and despite many of the suggestions there isn't any real possibility of out-of-mission combat. If the Shadow really did take your wife hostage and you are trying to save her, you'll have to default to the generic Move to be able to do anything unless the GM makes it a full blown mission. Despite the huge focus on social interaction it does it worse than other games by removing player agency. If a wizard and a fighter hang out in a bar after a big mission, they don't need a roll to socialize together and become friends. The players just decide it happens because they both want it to. Here, your two Watchwoman walking into a bar have to Roll to Become Friends, and only get one Friendship point if they succeed. Lovely. They'll fall apart and have to make up after one of them gets too Weary. Making a game system for it only served to make it more gamey. All the social justice stuff is obviously annoying, but in the end it was surface level. I forgot all about the paragraphs demanding pronouns be respected while I was looking at the Moves. There is nothing inherently womanly even about the social situations, despite my snark. The Shadow being "Toxic Masculinity" was just an excuse to make everyone not-a-man. Trying to make it fit that mold in any meaningful way stretches it, like what are you supposed to do? Have it bring all the woman to a giant kitchen and force them to make sandwiches for all eternity? Just delete a couple of paragraphs and you have a generic fantasy game. Well you have Dragon Age where someone replaced "Warden" with "Watcher".
 
Whatever, I don't have anything else going on. Lets keep going.

We got the six main Moves, now we move on to the ...9 Secondary moves. I'll mostly gloss over them unless something interesting comes up. No wait, I'll have to cover them later because despite being brought up now Mission Moves don't get covered until Missions! Ugh. Alright, it gives us the "Hardship Moves". First up is Resist The Shadow. If you engage in "toxic behavior", the Shadow attempts to take over! You succeed, it doesn't. You kinda succeed, you get a Weary/Jaded/Harm point (The game really likes to hand Jaded out like its a bad thing, when it really hasn't been thus far.). You fail, it takes you over. More interestingly we get a definition for "toxic behavior" that lets the Shadow take you over!

I say "more interestingly", but perhaps I have looked too long into the abyss and become a liar myself. It just says "toxic masculinity", a concept that doesn't seem to exist in the game world given that nobody seems to have a problem fielding an army without a single man in it, which doesn't really...clear up anything at all. The examples are doing things like "Macho Challenge of status" (Possibly like the characters did in the "Blow off Steam" example where they had a friendly archery contest that was portrayed positively?), "Trying to resolve problems through violence" (Maybe the reason we don't have any fighting moves is that engaging the enemy in combat immediately lets them possess you?), "Asserting Dominance through Intimidation" (One of the examples for the "Spend Friend Points to Help" thing was two people Intimidating a mob to back down). So three things we saw at least one example character doing and being portrayed in a positive light are all very bad toxic behaviors that should be avoided. It lists some "female" behavior like gossip or calling a chick fat, ugly, or easy. It lists some fairly harsh penalties for failure like "you let the enemy army into your compound", with the character example being that the PC got possessed and stabbed another PC. That is right! Act "Toxic" and demons will take over and make you kill the rest of the party. Be nice or else.

We get more rules for Weariness, or rather the rules for Surrendering to Weariness. Which are the same. We also get a repost of the "Recite a Eulogy" rules noting that you also lose weariness if you manage to pass. For some reason this is rolled for Training, I guess they teach you how to attend funerals in The Watch. It notes that you only lose weariness once even if multiple people died (sorry Munchkins).

"Start Session" looks like it will take longer than I planned. It is basically a "Go on a mission!" skill. Say what your mission is and any secondary objectives, assign them jobs (and yes, apparently jobs. Of the "three" you assign, one is "Recon and Lookout", and another is "Navigate and Strategize". ) You think we're finally describing all the violence you're doing to the enemy during this? Nope. You're supposed to describe a montage of character interaction that you had during the mission. Maybe we'll talk about what actually happens on the mission in a hundred pages or so.

"End Session" is also apparently a move, but it is just when you give out Friend Points to whoever you want. The character example mentions "angry sex". Its bolded along with a bunch of other words that probably where not meant to be.

And that is the end for moves! Now we get to move on to Characters! This game knows what is important. First Gender stuff, then rules, then characters as it should be.

Time yourself as we begin the infamous 90 minute character creation! We start off with the Character's twitter bio, including their name, pronouns, and "demeanor". You get to choose a name! And by choose, I mean pick one from a list. One listed in the playbook. Then you get to choose one of the genders. There are no incorrect choices (except for male)! It list "options" for demeanor without explain what those are or what it is, so I can only assume you get the option to pick that from a list as well. Look at all that freedom you have!

Next you get to pick your gear. It does nothing.

You can then pick your rank. If you go too high you lose the character. Power is too masculine, can't have that! The highest rank gets to pick out the missions, otherwise it doesn't really do anything.

There is a paragraph telling you that you'll make Bonds for free Frendship points. Later. Not now. We bring it up now for no particular reason. You also choose a clan. Also not now. We have to tell you what the clans are first. Also the clans have been disbanded lol.

Starting stats are pre-defenined based on your playbook. But you get to add +1 to a stat! That is having control over your character.

"Player Principals" are just cheesy lines there to fill space, and include "keep an eye on each other's emotional safety" implying that this is something you need to do out-of-character. The Playbook Agendas basically give your character's Harry Potter House, with a "Be X and X" character traits. You then get to choose 2 moves! Unless you are Spider. Then you get one. The other one is assigned to you. Right in the middle of character creation it tells the GM to make a bunch of NPCs to fill out the squad. Now the Friend Point assignment we where promised earlier can begin! Pick a line from a Playbook. Put someone's name on it. Write down your many, many totals.

Now we get the "Clan Questions", finally open ended questions and not picking something off the list. Each clan has two questions that the player is asked about for Worldbuilding, such as "What Great Hero game from this clan"? The questions vary in how broad the answer can be. There is only so many ways one can answer "What Ancient Mountain Fortress do they hold?" that can add to the world, while "Why is your clan indispensable to the others" can be answered thousands of ways.

The GM then asks players a bunch of similar questions. It says "At least one", but every bullet point has like three questions after the first. All seem to be about the clans and most seem to try to add some edginess to them. Your clan could stop the Shadow, why didn't they? Your clan got wiped out lol who do you blame and where did you bury the bodies? Again some seem like they could be valid open-ended worldbuilding, others have strict leading questions who's answer doesn't really do much for the world.

The First Session checklist suggests the first thing you should do is introduce your name and pronouns to the group. Given this is on page 67 a group going through character creation for the first time won't even read it until they're halfway done character creation. Most of it restates character creation, adding some steps that emphatically where not there. They put it at the end of character creation, where you won't know where it is unless you've gone through the book before. It really sure have been at the beginning if you wanted to use it at all.

So now we get into Playbooks. The things that you need to make a character and should have picked out already. Each has three words describing the type of player who would like it and what they can do, half of them sound like jerks. "Likes provoking those around them", "Like putting other PCs in harm's way", "Likes being self-centered".

Up to now I've been assuming that the playbooks where...actually third party books, but no. They're printed here. You get to choose between difficult choices as having "Common Clothing, Well-Worn Clothing, Patched Clothing, or Dull Clothing"! How will you ever decide? You probably spend the first forty five of the 90 minutes making that choice alone. All the choice are "Pick 1 or 2 words from this very short list", generally pretty restricting if you just stay with the rules as written. The "Ties That Bind" mentioned earlier are all one-liners like "X did me a big favor" or "I defended X from insult". It would definitely get repetitive if you wanted to replay this game at all.

Each clan has much simpler Moves, some of which are just modifications to the Basics, and they are allowed to choose 2 at player creation. I'll just pick out some of the sillier ones:
Cooler Heads Prevail (Bear): Roll to tell someone they're acting foolishly. They get to Listen, Attack You, or Not Listen (and take a -2 penalty)! That is right, for one of your choices you can force your comrades to attack you, or put them in greater danger! If you succeed in the roll!
Build Up to It(Eagle): Brag about yourself to get a bonus to Opening Up. Makes it auto succeed and counts partials as full success.
Wrapped Around My Finger (Jaded Eagle): Auto 10+ Provoke. Can be chosen after rolling. Mark Jaded to use.
To Die For(Jaded Eagle): Mark Jaded. Someone else takes harm meant for you.
Protecting Spirits:(Jaded Fox): Mark Jaded instead of Harm. Gain a form of experience point from taking damage.
On the Prowl (Lioness): Get EXP and Friendship Points for "Moments of Physical intimacy". Sleep your way to the top! It later notes you only get the benefit once per person. So you have to sleep with everyone for limitless power.
Told Ya So(Owl): Give -2 to a comrade who ignores your advice. You later get a Friendship point (worth +1) or lose Weariness after you rub it in their face. Totally worth it?
That Looks Fun(Jaded Owl): Take Jaded and use someone else's non-jaded moves. Just put that here for the munchkins.
Divine Agent(Raven): Worship a deity from a list. You can ask the GM a questions about it and get +1 based on the answer. The deities are things like "Love and sex", "Death", "Art", so you're probably going to have to go with one like "War" if you actually want to use this. And can get past the "no violence" thing.
We Too Few(Raven): Get twice as many points when your friends die!
Final Blessing(Jaded Raven): Mark Jaded to get a boost when your friends die. Not particularly notable except it comes right before
Miracle(Jaded Raven): Mark Jaded to have a friend succeed a failed Don't Die roll. So by taking Final Blessing you're just deliberately letting your comrades die I guess. Probably for the sweet 2X EXP.
Hidden Motives(Spider): Give -2 to a comrade. On a partial you expose yourself to fire. It could possibly supposed to be used on NPCs, but NPCs don't even have stats so far.
Dark Whispers(Jaded Spider): Mark Jaded to know what your comrade's deepest fears are! Remember, being straightforward and asking is masculine.
No Bridges Burnt(Wolf): Watcher means rolling to say "I'm Sorry". If you hit, they accept and you get things! Fail and they don't and you lose things.
Unleash The Wolf(Wolf): THE ONE COMBAT MOVE! Roll to do Harm. Roll well and deal more harm or take something from them. Since gear is just pretty accessories, go with the deal more harm option. On a partial success, you take harm lol.
Learned From the Best(Wolf Jaded): Pick a jaded move from another class. You only get one.
Sniff Em Out (Wolf Jaded): Mark Jaded to...ask...someone how they're feeling. Buy the move to make casual conversation! They must answer you honestly, so no brushing you off with "I'm Fine"!

Small note on those OP Jaded moves, like I said Jaded is basically a second EXP tract. The downside is that the last Jaded move is "You die", and you have to pick it if you run out of all other options. Since there are 4 other options, it takes 25 Jaded to lose the character barring choosing one at the start. Unless you're playing a long campaign you should basically be able to take as much Jaded as you want, especially if you start managing it after you get all the good skills in the tract.

Many of these moves - including those that cause harm- are meant to be done on other players. The Wolf's combat skill has notes stating what happens to other players if used on in a way that suggests it is totally meant to be used on them. It seems weird, normally when you get "Fireball" you are supposed to use it on the bad guys. I get that they're trying to focus on character interaction but they don't really do that very well. It moves everything to dice. If the Wolf comes along and gives a genuine, heartfelt apology and they roll poorly then nope your character doesn't get to accept it screw them. I listed most of the under/overpowered ones - some just give you and your comrades penalties for very little gain while others are "Get Free stuff and become immortal". This is especially common with combo moves, a Wolf with Learned from the best Protecting Spirits becomes the closest thing you can get in this game to a combat monster able to dish out and receive arbitrary amounts of damage.

GM's corner:
The bad guy is toxic masculinity and that is why you can't play men! You can't be a man and not be toxic and masculine. Its just not possible! Triggering Shadow possession is because you're behaving badly and not being a good feminist.
Agenda: At this point I'm sure that the random bolding is a printing error. Anyway this is mostly a generic "Do things, but let the player do things."
Principals: A set of rules that the GM "Must" follow. They range from "Dumb" (Make clan politics important! Also we dissolved the clans in the very little backstory we have lol) to "Generic but fine" (Sometimes, let someone else decide) with plenty of shoe-horned "RESPECT PEOPLE'S GENDER! MIRROR THE PATRIARCHY IN THE SHADOW". The longer versions get even rantier ("What? You want your character to be suspicious of a trans-woman since the shadow affects men? TRANS WOMAN ARE REAL WOMAN SHITLORD!")

A lot of the stuff in the middle was touchy feely, but despite being the main event the Toxic Masculinity stuff didn't really show up in the mechanisms. There is only one move to resist the shadow, all the rests are mostly interacting with specifically not-male party members leaving very little room for ranting.

GM Moves: They get put on a scale of "Hardness" ranging from something might happen to something urgent is happening. Well they say that, but then never really bring up the scale again so who knows. I'm not really familiar enough with the GM side of AW to say how typical this is, but they're really just GM things that boil down to "Make things happen". There isn't any roll suggestions, no way for the characters to avoid it. That is fine for things like "Make Monsters appear", since theoretically the player's reaction will be their own Moves. Inflict Harm is just...do an arbitrary amount of harm to whoever you want. Some of the moves are just silly like "Use Words Instead of Spears", the GM move to make NPCs say mean things! The next Section is on Adversaries, suggesting Threatening factions in addition to the Shadow such as Traditions, Radicals, and Innocent Civilians! Who needs to bother with lumbering magical mind control when these Innocent Men and Children are displaying Raw Pain?

Now we finally get to talk about what the heck the Shadow is. And it is another checklist. There is very little non-multiple-choice lore here. The check list for the shadow has a list of mostly mutually exclusive choices that you're supposed to pick two of, and some that should really be a part of it even if not chosen. Is it Technological and/or Magical? Is it Terror Inducing and/or Subtle? How about reality warping? We didn't bother to write that, so you pick one! What it actually wants is also multiple choice. All are basically the same "Its Toxic Masculinity!", so go nuts with that. You could basically make it the Reapers from Mass effect if you picked the less obvious options like Technological/Subtle Perfect Order/Disunity Among Enemies, but basically all of the motivations will play out the same. Likewise What it Does is yet another checklist that will end up working the same regardless given the minimal backstory. If you didn't choose "turn men into weapons", then it isn't like this particular shadow isn't targeting and taking over men to make its armies right? I briefly thought the answer was wrong when I turned the page and looked at the "Shadow's Servants" which included mutated Women, but as the text below it happily suggests that Men are the real enemy even if you picked the two Woman choices for its servants.

There is one page on NPCs, most of which was covered earlier. You get some more pages about "How not to trigger the special snowflakes playing this game" like fighting the fake patriarchy is too much for your players. Give trigger warnings to your players! If you suddenly reveal that the Shadow was Toxic Masculinity all along without telling people first it may give them the vapors! Don't assume your player actually read the description and knows what the game is about. What if a complicated series of missteps caused them to not know? Bet you didn't think of that.

We then get more blogposts, this time on how to be a SJW tabletop gamer! Then a bit of one-paragraph advice like "Make a shipping chart" and "Draw things on our empty map!"

Last but not least, "Missions!" how to actually play the game tucked waaaay in the back. They repost the Start of Session rules before telling us what all those positions actually mean. Watch Their Backs is a support job, you can give +1 to the people with real jobs! If you make your roll! Yay! Navigate/Strategize makes you mark a map or make a plan. If you succeed, everything goes well! If you fail, everything still goes well! You get one complication and Weary. Weary isn't much, these complications will have to be harsh for these rolls to mean anything. Recon/Lookout provides intel on a hit, a complication or a Weary on a partial, and two complications on failure. At Take Point you just always take a Complication, take a complication and Weary or Jaded on partial, and if you fail.....well you still succeed in the mission but you take two complications! And everyone takes Weary! The stakes have never been higher people!

The complications range in how bad they are pretty greatly. You got some harsher ones like "An NPC died!" (a handy way to kill off an NPC you don't like or who gives you sweeet EXP given players get to choose who it is if they take this option), to lesser choices like "Everyone Marks Weary!" or "I mark Weary and Jaded!". The stakes arn't particularly high, even in the worst possible outcome with the most killer game master possible you'd still have some of your squad left at the end and succeed in your mission. There is no way to fail. Every player gets one roll and then chooses what Complications they want from a list. The GM gets to pick for the worse rolls. That is the sum total of combat in this game. Success would be even more dull since you have one Complication to make a story of while the rest is just saying how you went through slaughtering the bad guys.

Did you think the GM and players where supposed to come up with missions? Nope! Another list! A couple side quests than a boss battle, it is kind enough to let you choose the order to fight them in. They are technically vague enough that you can make up the details on how and where the "Defend a fort!" mission takes places, but it isn't like there is a ton of variety with that. The Shadow Levels up once you get near the end, but the Shadow traits are just fluff so it doesn't really accomplish much lol.

It mentions how characters will rake up and get more NPCs as the campaign goes on. You can refuse if you want to be a small-scale team and nothing really changes.

I lied, it looks like the Shadow gets some actual power ups too. A free higher-tier complication can and will be used once per mission at the GM's choice. It includes things like "50% of the PCs roll to not die", though the rest are non-stated things like "A rebellion happens!". The PCs also get to make a "Change the World!" rule to change whatever they want about the world. If they get a partial, it only changes their clan. A failure also changes only the clan and makes the Shadow mad. It looks like your total levels of Jaded moves you've used as a bonus, so you'll probably succeed given how far in the campaign this is and how many Jaded moves you can make. There arn't any examples on what changes to make, which is fine since there really isn't anything telling you what society is like in the first place.

The Final Boss fight has special rules. And unlike Missions, it is an actual fight! At least you take out hit points by making Battle Moves instead of just winning, and failure doesn't fill anything in. These rules are probably more fun than the mission rules, though the consequences are still relatively low. I'd probably replace the Mission system with this battle system if I ever got possessed by the Shadow and forced to GM this game as a form of torture. You get a bunch of new moves that basically accomplish the same thing with different stats, roll to remove a Segment. Partial success removes a segment and has a consequence based on what you where trying to do. After you beat the Final Boss, roll to change society again! Hopefully it is a good one by now.

That is basically it. A page for acknowledgments and how to embarrass everyone at cons remain but don't look particularly entertaining.

In the end I'd place it a step above "Totally Unplayable". It walks a weird line between not giving you enough to work with and railroading you. It expects the GM and players to do most the heavy lifting, the lore basically ends at "Shadow and men are BAD! We had clans that did things but they're gone now!". At the same time it isn't a freeform game meant for the GM to write their own story, you're supposed to check all the boxes and follow the rails. Its like playing Mad Libs with a wordbank. It would be more fun if you either just wrote the words in and said "The Shadow is a magical thing, here are what its minions look like, here is how it acts" or went vaguer and let the GM write it themselves. As it stands the lore that is there just stands in for the very shallow premise of "All the PCs arn't men!" without really doing anything more than worldbuilding. The Shadow isn't a bad antagonist if you take out the couple of paragraphs ranting about how it was totally Toxic Masculinity, The Watch is basically trying to be a Bioware game and it has a Bioware villain to match. . All in all it felt like someone who is a fan of Bioware games but is one of those people who hates video games and plays on the easiest mode available just to do the character interaction things. It outright separates the character interaction scenes from the action, while it tells you to pick out some bonding scenes from the mission you do that afterwords rather than as you progress through it making them inherently separated. The actual gameplay is generic and faceless, it would take a talented GM to turn the missions into an interesting story and despite many of the suggestions there isn't any real possibility of out-of-mission combat. If the Shadow really did take your wife hostage and you are trying to save her, you'll have to default to the generic Move to be able to do anything unless the GM makes it a full blown mission. Despite the huge focus on social interaction it does it worse than other games by removing player agency. If a wizard and a fighter hang out in a bar after a big mission, they don't need a roll to socialize together and become friends. The players just decide it happens because they both want it to. Here, your two Watchwoman walking into a bar have to Roll to Become Friends, and only get one Friendship point if they succeed. Lovely. They'll fall apart and have to make up after one of them gets too Weary. Making a game system for it only served to make it more gamey. All the social justice stuff is obviously annoying, but in the end it was surface level. I forgot all about the paragraphs demanding pronouns be respected while I was looking at the Moves. There is nothing inherently womanly even about the social situations, despite my snark. The Shadow being "Toxic Masculinity" was just an excuse to make everyone not-a-man. Trying to make it fit that mold in any meaningful way stretches it, like what are you supposed to do? Have it bring all the woman to a giant kitchen and force them to make sandwiches for all eternity? Just delete a couple of paragraphs and you have a generic fantasy game. Well you have Dragon Age where someone replaced "Warden" with "Watcher".
Thanks for covering this. BTw, did you notice how The Shadow making women beautiful is a sign of "corruption"?
 
It's also strange how this Shadow/toxic masculinity is portrayed as a corrupting force, but with no reasoning behind it. It just turned up one day from thin air, and sudden all those toxic masculine things everyone was doing before would turn you evil. Apparently in SJW land, people just turn toxic for no rational reason or benefit, and the only defense against this is to cluck your tongue or to have a weepy emotional breakdown about how awful your life is.
 
It's also strange how this Shadow/toxic masculinity is portrayed as a corrupting force, but with no reasoning behind it. It just turned up one day from thin air, and sudden all those toxic masculine things everyone was doing before would turn you evil. Apparently in SJW land, people just turn toxic for no rational reason or benefit, and the only defense against this is to cluck your tongue or to have a weepy emotional breakdown about how awful your life is.
Or just sincerely stop identifying as a man. I wonder what the author would think of healthy masculinity sites like Art of MAnliness.
 
Apparently in SJW land, people just turn toxic for no rational reason or benefit, and the only defense against this is to cluck your tongue or to have a weepy emotional breakdown about how awful your life is.

Err, well, given how a lot of people whose lives are documented on this website act and react, that seems to be a pretty decent description of average life for a person who spends way too much time on the internet.

I wonder what the author would think of healthy masculinity sites like Art of MAnliness.

Doesn't matter how "positive" or "affirming" or "constructive" sites like that are, they will always be tainted by original sin, i.e. the Y chromosome.
 
Thanks for covering this. BTw, did you notice how The Shadow making women beautiful is a sign of "corruption"?

I gave it a pass there. Its basically the Vampire trope of "They look pretty in a weird doll like way", as one of the options for the Female corrupted. The Author's ideological idea was something like "It turns you into the idealized version of what the Patriarchy wants you to be! Men become savage killers, woman stay at home and look pretty, except without the stay at home part because we kinda need badguys!". I imagine the obvious alternative of transforming the woman into some kind of monster spawning mother would be too sexual assaulty for the author's taste.

It does mean that the woman supporting the Patriarchy are better looking tho lol. Probably a side effect of the fact trying to critique someone's looks or give beauty advice risks someone going "That's toxic bro, you get possessed by a demon and commit a murder."

It's also strange how this Shadow/toxic masculinity is portrayed as a corrupting force, but with no reasoning behind it. It just turned up one day from thin air, and sudden all those toxic masculine things everyone was doing before would turn you evil. Apparently in SJW land, people just turn toxic for no rational reason or benefit, and the only defense against this is to cluck your tongue or to have a weepy emotional breakdown about how awful your life is.

Its part of the larger backstory issues where they really don't explain anything and leave important details to a check list. The Shadow's origin is never covered even if you decide what type it is. Like is this the first step of some macho alien invasion if you pick the Technological path? Did some wizard do it (not that magic is ever detailed beyond the religious Moves), how and why? The "everyone was doing it before" part is also left vague. There are no hints about what society was like. There is a vague hint of a clan system that they destroyed for no particular reason before the game started, while still trying to keep it a thing. Was the land ruled by men so manly it broke a hole in the space time continuum and summoned the Shadow out of pure masculinity? Did woman and uwu valid nbs rule the land with a lacy fist causing forces to send a Shadow to ruin this pink paradise? We don't know! Write it yourself apparently.
 
Insane Twitter trannies have a bizarre hatred for Mike Mearls, lead D&D designer (now apparently former lead D&D designer). I could never understand the exact reason behind this one, but it is vicious, insane stuff, and if you do a search for it, you will see it has been going on for at least a year all day every day.

View attachment 1261085View attachment 1261087View attachment 1261098View attachment 1261097View attachment 1261096View attachment 1261095View attachment 1261094View attachment 1261093View attachment 1261092View attachment 1261091
Dear Twitter.
I am not just shaking right now.
I am literally shaking.
They did not actually fire That Fucker Mike Mearls.

mearls_twitterm.png mearls_twitterl.png mearls_twitterk.png mearls_twitterj.png mearls_twitteri.png
mearls_twitterh.png mearls_twitterg.png mearls_twitterf.png

Nice to see the mentally ill indie mini-RPG squad out in full force.
 
Dear Twitter.
I am not just shaking right now.
I am literally shaking.
They did not actually fire That Fucker Mike Mearls.

View attachment 1311194View attachment 1311196View attachment 1311198View attachment 1311200View attachment 1311202
View attachment 1311203View attachment 1311204View attachment 1311205

Nice to see the mentally ill indie mini-RPG squad out in full force.
So what exactly did Mearls do? I saw he supposedly doxed trannies and fags to a "rapist", are we talking actual-rapist- type rapist or a Tumblr-definition of """rapist"""? Or is it a Jewario-type thing? And what did Mearls exactly do to get people's knickers in a knot?
 
An artist named Zak Smith, a lifelong shit-stirrer and fart-huffer, came afoul of Twitter and was alleged to have harassed women coworkers. Mearls said he investigated the claims and found no merit. Then people started claiming that Mearls had given the names and contact info of the accusers to Smith, something with basically zero evidence and which neither of them have admitted to. Months later, Smith's ex accuses him of being an abusive husband who coerced and browbeat people into having sex. He denied the claims and has sued her over them, that whole lawsuit is still pending so there's no entertaining story from that yet. He also sued an RPGnet/SA mod who had been broadcasting these accusations and won, getting a financial payout and a forced retraction, but this was in Australia which has a super low bar for defamation lawsuits, so Twitter has promptly ignored it and continued calling him a rapist. Though at this point, Jesus, Buddha, and Albert Einstein could all appear and vouch for the man and Twitter would still call him a rapist.

That said, Zak Smith is already a borderline cow and burns bridges like he's trying for insurance money. I've no idea whether the allegations have any truth or if it's a smear campaign, but since the guy's a rampant asshole it's really no skin off my back whichever side comes out on top here.
 
An artist named Zak Smith, a lifelong shit-stirrer and fart-huffer, came afoul of Twitter and was alleged to have harassed women coworkers. Mearls said he investigated the claims and found no merit. Then people started claiming that Mearls had given the names and contact info of the accusers to Smith, something with basically zero evidence and which neither of them have admitted to. Months later, Smith's ex accuses him of being an abusive husband who coerced and browbeat people into having sex. He denied the claims and has sued her over them, that whole lawsuit is still pending so there's no entertaining story from that yet. He also sued an RPGnet/SA mod who had been broadcasting these accusations and won, getting a financial payout and a forced retraction, but this was in Australia which has a super low bar for defamation lawsuits, so Twitter has promptly ignored it and continued calling him a rapist. Though at this point, Jesus, Buddha, and Albert Einstein could all appear and vouch for the man and Twitter would still call him a rapist.

That said, Zak Smith is already a borderline cow and burns bridges like he's trying for insurance money. I've no idea whether the allegations have any truth or if it's a smear campaign, but since the guy's a rampant asshole it's really no skin off my back whichever side comes out on top here.
All of this sounds incredibly petty and like Twitter-shitheads just go crazy cause it tingles them in their funny place the right way to be outraged over mere allegations... but that's what you have to expect nowadays.
 
<snip where WinchesterPremiun reviewed a pile of dogshit masquerading as an RPG>
What is this? High School Girl Drama, the RPG?

Seriously, it reminds me of the social combat systems from Exalted, scaled down and turned into an RPG in themselves. And being used to defend against an all-destroying, all-corrupting force. Right.
 
What is this? High School Girl Drama, the RPG?

Seriously, it reminds me of the social combat systems from Exalted, scaled down and turned into an RPG in themselves. And being used to defend against an all-destroying, all-corrupting force. Right.
With a big dose of bitterness towards men and masculinity.
 
Back
Top Bottom