Is it actually what their guy would do? And if it's not disruptive, it shouldn't matter. Now if it makes the PC into a scizophrenic weirdo that has no consistent thought process for anything could maybe talk to them about that if it's distracting to people.
Tabletop Roleplaying Games (D&D, Pathfinder, CoC, ETC.)
- Thread starter Surtur
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
I don't think I've ever seen someone use the ole "it's what my character would do" if it wasn't in the context of being totally retarded and lolsorandumb chaotic stupid. It doesn't happen often but when it does you roll your eyes.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
The Traveller 5E (as in DnD 5E, not Traveller5 aka T5) people keep putting out short little clips about their thing. The more I hear, the more bizarre it seems. They're straight up using DnD classes like "Barbarian". They've basically gotten rid of the traditional character creation system (it's there, but not mechanically).
They've created a "new universe" for Traveller called CivX. At this point they've removed both the system and the setting from Traveller. I don't know what else is left.
They've created a "new universe" for Traveller called CivX. At this point they've removed both the system and the setting from Traveller. I don't know what else is left.
What else would your guy do? The thing he wouldn't do? Just play a video game if you're not going to care about the internal logic of narratives and characters. My characters do all sorts of reckless and suicidal stuff. Sometimes they just shoot each other in the head unceremoniously. Very inefficient, However it is the most memorable/enjoyable.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2015
I will take every opportunity to advocate the braunstein style of play.
Let them.
GMs worry about PVP, or players making roleplaying choices that in any way impedes the party being a hivemind of itinerant junk dealers inexorably drawn as if by magnetism to the next dungeon, while simultaneously bemoaning players treating their characters as nothing more than stat blocks.
A truly engaged player wants to embody their character, but even in a good party where one player isn't hogging the spotlight, how often in an average campaign is that character actually in the roleplay focus?
Do a braunstein. Let every player do what their character would do. Let every character be in the spotlight literally 100% of the time. Let them fight, plot against, conspire with, backstab, and kill each other. The Fellowship of the Ring had more intraparty conflict than your average D&D party.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
The question should be whether it's something anyone capable of functioning would do. If it isn't, they shouldn't be in a party in the first place. Basically, is this something only a jerk would do who you would kick out of any group or, if he does have an obnoxious personality, is he still useful?
If neither, why is he still around?
So having a jerkass character is one thing, but not carrying your own weight isn't acceptable.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2018
Bizarre. That Neon Odyssey thing people posted a few pages ago at least renamed and reskinned all the classes.
Juke and Jam
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 31, 2020
What an absolutely worthless project. Pretty much everything I've learned about it has come across as an exersice in moronic futility. Of course it's also a boldfaced cashgrab aimed at the latest generation of hobbyists who are still too green to understand, that there are more games out there than D&D and in fact most of them are far superior, especially when it comes to expressing different genres.
- Joined
- May 25, 2024
T20, the original d20 Traveller product, is far superior anyway, and it's set in Charted Space with its own set of sectors. You get up fight villainous militant vegan centaurs, who doesn't love that? You can also purchase the whole thing for 35 dollars from Marc Miller, which I did a few months ago along with everything else Traveller.
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2024
Why are people so apprehensive to play anything but D&D or pathfinder anyways? Especially when they are clearly trying to go for a different genre and trying to homebrew it into something else entirely. Surley it is easier to just learn another system.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
Widespread appeal and marketing, really; those two games are advertised a lot compared to others, and there's also the fact that DND 5E in particular was designed for a wide variety of settings, homebrew and such. Other settings like Warhammer are more focused and designed for a more specific idea in mind, not to mention the respective communities tend to be... different.
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2024
Makes sense, something I've also noticed the people who only play those D&D also never choose to be humans as their race. Its just strange that they don't even try something else I guess.
Konigsberg
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2026
I think it mostly comes from a place of laziness to be frank. A lot of people can't be bothered to learn the rules of the game they're currently playing, and mostly rely on learning the rules at the table from the GM or a more experienced player in the group, instead of on their own. So to these reading-averse motherfuckers the idea of a new game where nobody is more experienced to leech knowledge from probably seems pretty scary.
It absolutely is easier to just outright learn a new game then try to break 5e or Pathfinder apart until you can rearrange the pieces to poorly resemble the thing you actually want to play. However, to the brainlets that suffer from this particular hangup the idea of putting the upfront effort to learn a new game is more intimidating than putting in an assload more overall work to rebuild 5e into a completely different game.
Edit: I should also say, being averse to learning a new game seems to mostly be a player issue, so if a GM has to rebuild 5e into a sci-fi space opera because their group wants to play a sci-fi game but refuses to learn a new system, all that effort is now on the GM to rebuild the game and the lazy players can coast by doing nothing.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2016
Don't forget how some people like to make games but not play them. For a certain kind of nerd, making up rules is more fun than using them.