Don't be picking and choosing now. include the page before (X card, allow woke shit) and after (Players with disabilities)
(Sorry for potato formatting, too lazy to screen shot)
I skipped those because I don't really see anything woke with it, one is basically "don't be an ass, don't let others be an ass" (common sense but again spelled out), the other one options how you could make disabilities work as a GM, but nowhere near flying combat wheelchair shit. first one is even so ambiguous I'd consider non-stop whining snowflakes more affected by that than anyone else.
And we've all read the X card shit so no need to repost.
Sure its in the GM section, but they show up ready with the page number from reddit. Which strengthens their argument.
And yes, I will happily pull out "My table, my rules", but my point is I shouldn't have to. And I don't really like to because going full autocrat sets a bad tone at the table.
You also have players being trained up by nubbie GMs reading that crap and taking it for gospel. Again, none of this fucks with your current table but you will need new players/a new group at some point the future.
how often does that happen tho in reality? people who would bring up page numbers with "papa paizo said you have to let me play" will be filtered out like the other crappy players you probably screen for anyway, because they're the same type of ppl most don't want at their table to begin with. and I don't think it will create bad players/GMs, because after all it's mostly common sense stuff and experience will do the rest. shit GMs will run shit tables because (among other things) they let shit players play how they want, that has always been the case and always will be, but it might give them a better start and you gotta start somewhere.
that's why I don't think it's a big of a deal (at least worthy an explanation than just a sticker), but then I'm not recruiting out of the wokest parts of the country which might color my judgement. it also helps that the CR crowd doesn't play anything else than dnd5, same for woke attention whores because it's the most popular, so they already filter themselves.
Agreed. If you want to play just a dungeon crawl, go pick up a copy of Descent: Journey's In the Dark. It's that with all the miniatures you need included.
new descent is a bit eh, not as bad as expected (gameplay even has some surprisingly good parts imo), but totally overpriced for what it is. app-driven gameplay is also a bit divisive. 2e is OOP and will fetch a hefty sum.
just grab something like dungeoneers if you got all the materials for a rpg anyway (there are more but that's the first one that came to mind):
It wasn't all bad, but 90% of the problems were the writing/books. Tinker gnomes minus the exceptional culture had a more unique feel than just "wood elves but small". Draconians are cool. Dragonlances are a cool weapon. Minotaur pirates are cool. Ogres being a fallen race with oni/ogre mages being a rare kind of throwback are cool. A setting where a disaster has occurred and all the pieces are still being picked up and a lot of maps being outdated or with large swathes of unexplored/unknown territory is also cool. It's just a shame that most of this potential was wasted.
ironically for me it's the other way around, the setting and characters are fun to read about, but less fun to play in or with. sure you can move out of the main area where all the stuff happens, but if you do your own thing in the middle of nowhere in no relevance to the setting might as well do your own thing/play something else.