🗑️ Trashfire StyxHexenhammer666 / Tarl Warwick - Oddball Occultist Neckbeard (who can make some interesting content) + his many scorned exes

  • 🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
MunsterCheeseJr said:
Julian of the Master Race Frankenstein video channel has unprivated his videos. Here is an archive of the first recorded event in Samantha's recording timeline.

There is a little bit of fresh material at the very beginning. Along with a few pictures of Julian and his kids hanging out with Styx in the New Orleans area.

The meat is 15 minutes & 30 seconds in.

What the heck is going on here 720-hq.mp4

Youtube's closed captioning is extremely helpful in identifying what is being said.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dpT0yscdHt4
Click to expand...
One minute in and I can’t take the horrid editing anymore. Muhgawd! And there 30 whole minute. Oh no no no no! Just put the info out there unedited and let the cards fall where they may. This Julian guy is another nutter. Why would anyone put their children out there on the web to be associated with this hokey shit? He’s making Styx look better by comparison and he’s not doing Samantha any favors either. Thanks for sifting through all the crap so we don’t have to.
 
MunsterCheeseJr said:
@Catgirl Tyranid Because Tarl always threatens to sue them. Take away their finances. Threatens their husband and kids. Styx isn't as nice and even keeled in private as he is on stream.



It also appears he is threating to use what Jade/Naijella has said in the past to get her into trouble if she ever traveled to Germany again.

Satanist Styx has no problems playing bare knuckles and dirty.
Click to expand...
OwlFuck might want to reacquaint himself with the Ahkilah / Sargon case and read up on the principles of Legal Reciprocity.

If I remember correctly, there was a period during the mid 2000's that American Holywood / Music people who owned property in Britbong were using the UK courts to take legal action against American based publications and Media operations as UK law was more amenable to Defamation type cases than American law. I don't know if it still happens, or if laws changed, but for a period it was a thing.
Clooney, The Douglases and I think Madonna all used it at the time.

Edit: In the USA if you are deemed to be a public figure, such as an Actor, a Politician, a Sportsperson your rights against defamation are harder to prove than those against a normally private person.
In the UK you are (supposed to ) be treated equally, regardless of public exposure.
 
Last edited:
MunsterCheeseJr said:
@Catgirl Tyranid Because Tarl always threatens to sue them. Take away their finances. Threatens their husband and kids. Styx isn't as nice and even keeled in private as he is on stream.



It also appears he is threating to use what Jade/Naijella has said in the past to get her into trouble if she ever traveled to Germany again.

Satanist Styx has no problems playing bare knuckles and dirty.
Click to expand...
@MunsterCheeseJr- Of all the "popular" streaming lolcows, who do you rate as the phoniest, most deceitful, false presenter of the bunch? Where does Tarl rate in the lolcow streamer sweepstakes? 😉
 
an_actual_reptilian said:
That's actually a thing? Dang.... I thought it was just my own observation. Always been scared to ask anyone if its normal that somtimes two not so good looking individuals make really great looking individuals. On the flip side I've seen some great looking couples have ugly as sin chillrens!

Anyone else find it hilarious that the now Bibble reading chick done fucked a proclaimed Satanist and it trying to convince him to read the Bibble after he 'forced' her get an abortion? I for the most part believe abortion shouldn't be a form of late contraceptive ( as most sloots use abortion for ) But holy hell I'm happy for her, that she didn't spawn with that son of a hamster.
Click to expand...
I knew two dummies who made a genius. Their three year old was reading her bedtime stories to them. I’ve heard about the two uglies making a pretty and the opposite, but I don’t think Styx’s parents were ugly. Just average. Same with Styx. He’s not ugly. He’s just average. They’re the kind of people you don’t know notice in a crowd.
 
DominoPetachi said:
I knew two dummies who made a genius. Their three year old was reading her bedtime stories to them. I’ve heard about the two uglies making a pretty and the opposite, but I don’t think Styx’s parents were ugly. Just average. Same with Styx. He’s not ugly. He’s just average. They’re the kind of people you don’t know notice in a crowd.
Click to expand...
This is average looking? Look at this wonky looking dude. Without YouTube Tarl would be an incel for sure and washing dishes at Wendy's or selling wands.
Styxhexenhamer666face-1180x664-2384399014.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
C. G. B Spender said:
This is average looking? Look at this wonky looking dude. Without YouTube Tarl would be an incel for sure and washing dishes at Wendy's or selling wands.
Click to expand...
I mean that particular picture isn’t doing him any favors, but it’s not ugly. Average is just bleh. It’s whatever. Ugly is like OOF. I don’t look at him and go OOF. Not for the way he looks anyway. I look at him and go “eh”. He neither attracts nor repels imo. His behavior and personality on the other hand can be very ugly and repulsive.
 
anscochrome said:
@MunsterCheeseJr- Of all the "popular" streaming lolcows, who do you rate as the phoniest, most deceitful, false presenter of the bunch? Where does Tarl rate in the lolcow streamer sweepstakes?
Click to expand...
The most... I gave up on that a long time ago. Today I am pleasantly surprised to find out that someone is the same off screen as they are on screen. Truly fully integrated people are rare.
 
an_actual_reptilian said:
That's actually a thing? Dang.... I thought it was just my own observation. Always been scared to ask anyone if its normal that somtimes two not so good looking individuals make really great looking individuals. On the flip side I've seen some great looking couples have ugly as sin chillrens!

Anyone else find it hilarious that the now Bibble reading chick done fucked a proclaimed Satanist and it trying to convince him to read the Bibble after he 'forced' her get an abortion? I for the most part believe abortion shouldn't be a form of late contraceptive ( as most sloots use abortion for ) But holy hell I'm happy for her, that she didn't spawn with that son of a hamster.
Click to expand...
Crazy bitches almost always end up being bible thumpers. They go do a buncha degenerate shit then turn 35 and are like OMG I AM A GOOD CHRISTIAN WOMAN, PRAISE GAWD, IM SO PURE, HE SAVED ME, UR ALL SINNERS AND EVIL... but then go off n do drugs and still suck a ton of cocks. But they suck cock in the name of the LORD now.

Seen it happen more than once. They get a moral dilemma but can't stop being a BPD whore because that's their nature. See also prisoners who do fucked up shit then claim to be saved while in jail/prison but come out and still do the same bullshit but now with a bible.

Also see chris chan who did degenerate shit and now thinks he's jesus.
 
HairyBadger said:
If I remember correctly, there was a period during the mid 2000's that American Holywood / Music people who owned property in Britbong were using the UK courts to take legal action against American based publications and Media operations as UK law was more amenable to Defamation type cases than American law. I don't know if it still happens, or if laws changed, but for a period it was a thing.
Clooney, The Douglases and I think Madonna all used it at the time.
Click to expand...

The Defamation Act of 2013 tightened things up.

I've been sued for defamation lol and threatened with it on a number of occasions so know the law pretty well.

In English law there are a number of defences to defamation:

1) truth

2) honest opinion

3) public interest

4) reportage

5) privilege (complicated to explain, pertains to legal privilege, if you publish something said in court, that isn't true & in other circumstances)

Additionally, if you are suing someone for defamation, you have to prove serious harm, such as losing work, money, or being shunned by your community.

To sue for defamation in the High Court you have to pay court fees which are 5% of the amount claimed for as well as legal fees of your representative. You can't get a McKenzie friend or some unqualified anon to argue for you either. You either argue your own case, or you must appoint a qualified barrister with rights of audience before a judge.

You also must engage in pre action protocol and give the defendant an opportunity to remedy the libel.


TLDR: Styx won't be suing British citizens like Naijella for defamation. It's not worth his time, he'd lose and if he doesn't have the liquidity to stump up bail, he won't be able to pay UK lawyers plus VAT.
 
Caroline Farrow said:
The Defamation Act of 2013 tightened things up.

I've been sued for defamation lol and threatened with it on a number of occasions so know the law pretty well.

In English law there are a number of defences to defamation:

1) truth

2) honest opinion

3) public interest

4) reportage

5) privilege (complicated to explain, pertains to legal privilege, if you publish something said in court, that isn't true & in other circumstances)

Additionally, if you are suing someone for defamation, you have to prove serious harm, such as losing work, money, or being shunned by your community.

To sue for defamation in the High Court you have to pay court fees which are 5% of the amount claimed for as well as legal fees of your representative. You can't get a McKenzie friend or some unqualified anon to argue for you either. You either argue your own case, or you must appoint a qualified barrister with rights of audience before a judge.

You also must engage in pre action protocol and give the defendant an opportunity to remedy the libel.


TLDR: Styx won't be suing British citizens like Naijella for defamation. It's not worth his time, he'd lose and if he doesn't have the liquidity to stump up bail, he won't be able to pay UK lawyers plus VAT.
Click to expand...
Yup, pretty much what I thought. I understand (1)(2)(3) and (5 - spoken in court or parliament)
What is (4) Reportage?

Edit: Got it.
(4) Reporting
 
Last edited:
Styx on Fights, Yelling, Arguments:

> Just uh don't start any fights you know. Be chill man.
> Best thing you can do in a relationship is be practically inert.
> I hate fighting. I hate yelling. I hate fighting. I hate arguments.
> When given the chance, I just retreat from an argument. I prefer not to even have one.

(PS. Thanks to whomever suggested Avidemux software for chopping clips.)

Source:
October 10th, 2024 livestream at 1 hour, 10 minutes & 53 seconds.
Entitled: "Thursday LIVE: Desantis Slaps Kamala, Polls, Democrats Are Melting Down, etc"
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom