So.
The claim is to want:
- Somebody to cuddle with long-term
- Physical intimacy
- Sex
- Cuddling more than sex
- Someone to hug
- Physical contact with another human
- A relationship / partner
- Hugs and kisses
- Love
- To take care of and 'serve' a partner
- affection and companionship
- Emotional closeness
- To stop waking up crying every day
- To feel fulfilled rather than lonely
- Hope that she will eventually 'find somebody'
does not want:
- Another decade without intimacy
- A life without love, touch, or connection
- To feel 'morbidly depressed'
- To feel condemned to permanent loneliness
So a drug addict and a drunken pirate is the choice (with both of them not requiting the love)?
But this guy:
Ken Jarrell - I know someone thats an exceptional human being and was interested but you rejected him so....
Response:
- "voice is unattractive" (not something someone can control, and that person, despite not having a nice voice, could do everything else on the list of requests above)
- "you weren't engaging with me enough" - but she chooses to try and get love from a out of touch drug addict and dismissive pirate.
- "you seem too reliant on outside validation and human companionship" - her entire wish list, cuddles, physical intimacy, hugs, a partner, love, companionship, emotional closeness, absence of feeling alone, touch - is begging to be reliant on outside validation and companionship yet the same request in the other direction is met with disdain... Sounds like self effacement 101.
Do people read the stuff they write about their own wants and desires and then read their own responses to other people with the same wants and desires? Im assuming producing text output and responding to another's text output requires some processing in the mind.
Its important to identify and acknowledge attachment issues and disorders.
