Armoured Skeptic vs Stonetoss. Happening right now, can't screen. Copied from Greg's thread:
archive:
https://archive.li/KN7XY
G: I've noticed you keep popping up in my mentions over the conversation, but I'm confused why you have yet to actually ANSWER my question. Are you, or are you not against race-mixing? Do you believe that corporations are actively PUSHING race-mixing and homosexuality over products?
S: Thank you, ArmouredCorpulence, glad you went from making assumptions about my opinions to actually ASKING me: 1. I am indifferent to race mixers 2. Corporations absolutely push homosexuality and race mixing, even to the detriment of their own products.
G: I don't think they're pushing it though - not like you believe. It's much more likely they're just pandering for points. It's not to their detriment though. The "get woke go broke" meme is a misnomer. The outrage caused by these ads only end up increasing sales of most products // And I did ask you - a couple times. Don't play dumb, please.
S: Yeah, you asked me - after I responded to you making assumptions about me. The proof is even in the tweet chain you linked. Lmao, how much bad faith can one man argue in?
G: I'm still confused by your answer though... please clarify. To what extent are you "indifferent" to race-mixing? If you're not against it, why even bring up that the media showcases it? It must offend you on some level.
S; Sure, but let's not pretend you didn't just argue in bad faith (see above) and your fat ego compels you to pretend otherwise. I am indifferent to race-mixing to the same extent that someone can be indifferent to drag queens and yet still take exception to drag queen story time.
G: I'll take an L on the bad-faith thing, ok I agree with the storytime thing, but conflating race mixing and homosexuality to the oversexualized practice of drag, shows you only see race-mixing and homosexuality as being sexually degenerate, which is why ppl see you as against it.
G: A sexualized drag-queen dressed like baphomet, teaching kids "this is normal" is going to confuse toddlers, but kids are going to see lesbians and interracial couples kiss in public. Drag is literally about sexualization - it's unfair to conflate it with people loving eachother
G: From my personal experience, it appears as if you are simply offended by things that don't conform to the norm, and simply do not like things that don't make sense to you. If you're indifferent, what does panel 6 mean? (comic with the geometrical figures)
G: So, forgive me, oh pure one, for assuming you had a problem with race-mixing... I've been reading your comics wrong this whole time. But maaaaaaaaaaybe you can see why people see you as racist now? At least own it.
S: Panel 6 is pedophilia, clearly. I definitely own being anti-pedophilia. Try harder.
G: Oh, right, I can see that. Why are you conflating it with homosexuality and trans though? That's even worse, now that I think of it. You could argue the media is pushing acceptance of some strange stuff, but the people conflating LGBT with pedos are extremely fringe.
S: "people conflating LGBT with pedos are extremely fringe". Ok I guess. (pics of drag kids and drag story hour)
G: Though I would agree this is pedophilia - this isn't what I meant when I said pedos being conflated with LGBT. This is pedophilia WITHIN the LGBT, but it is not in and of itself the LGBT that are pushing this. This is - again - the DRAG community, which is openly sexual.