You should check Library Genesis. They have the first four volumes of the Superman Archives.
I'll look it up, thanks.
...................
@topic
So I started reading the Batman storyline "Bruce Wayne: Murderer?"
I'm reading from a version that divides it into two books: "Bruce Wayne: Murderer?" and "Bruce Wayne: Fugitive." I'm most of the way thru the first book now.
So far it kind of annoys me.
One problem with a lot of Batman writers is they always want every story to be about how everyone is affected
emotionally, so a lot of the story is characters chatterboxing about how sad they'd feel if Bruce actually did it, which is boring because as the reader we know damn well he didn't. It basically begins feeling like a glorified version of one of those cartoon episodes where the hero gets framed and everyone turns on them.
Me, my interest was I thought this was gonna be a murder mystery, but the book doesn't want to focus on that. In fact there's been little said about Vesper's murder.
This is one thing that bugs me: there's less evidence against Bruce Wayne than there was against OJ Simpson, and well... OJ walked. The initial sequence reads "obvious frame up," and yet everyone took retard pills in this story, even Oracle and Tim Drake are wondering "did he actually do it?" and the Gotham PD seem convinced. I think Bruce needs better attorneys.
Then the story hits a midpoint where Bruce Wayne escapes and... he decides he's going to be Batman full time, "there is no Bruce Wayne anymore."
Buh-scuse me? Don't you need Bruce Wayne to make sure funding keeps being channeled into your Batman efforts? The story is completely ignoring that so far, and again, none of his friends think to bring that up, instead preferring a "OMG you not being Bruce anymore is so troubling and sad!" angle.
It's kind of dumb so far.