But a lot of people consider drawn zoophile a the same as IRL zoo. There's a reason why certain furry artists refuse to do so, and one of them is that a man fucking a dog doesn't look nice in an art portfolio.
I've also never heard of those two guys SP is refering to. But c'mon step up on the evidence and screen caps to back up claims.
Assuming you're going to keep reading the thread, there's a few questions which you seem to be intentionally dodging. If you don't answer then it's probably safe to assume the worst.
Do you have proof that you're actually Colliefan?
Do you own a dog?
Do you have any evidence to back up your claims? You can use the wayback machine.
Agreed. I feel really dumb for thinking there was anything to this. @Colliefan , you may be into drawing sexualized animals, but you are not attracted to them and that really makes you a bit less perverted than your average furrie. I apologize. Eccentric yes, cow no. Eccentric is fine, we all have our odd aspects.
A guy came here trying to defend some of his fetishes, got called out on it, and then insisted that one of the pictures he got (of an adult raping an underage anthro-collie) was a gift and that it would of been rude to refuse it. Then he left.
Look, I've watched the little bickering/autist-fest that took place with you, ParadiseFreedom/Diamond-Inuyasha/Diamond13, Mr-Malkov, Mare-of-the-Sea and who ever else. They at least had evidence to back up their claims. All you and Diamond ever had were angry, poorly written blogs accusing them of pedophilia, forging evidence and drawing avatars of them being raped/abused/in diapears/pissing themselves/with small penises...
I also recall you favored blocking people then going "Oh, well they said this and that to me and did not want to talk!"
Well guess what, people wanna talk right now, start giving us some evidence mang.
You know, if I wasn't sexually attracted to something or didn't want to have sex with something, I wouldn't collect or draw sexually themed pictures of it. But that's just me I guess.