Soyence Megathread - Debate science

[HyperboreanRightsActivist]

Here you go @Argon

 

[Punished Puck]

oh great another thinly veiled anti-science thread

 

[Michael Jacks0n]

First topic of debate...

Hairless pets: weird.

 

[Margo Martindale]

Science and academia used to be trustworthy but now its full of grifting and nonsense, and certainly not helped by tilted studies and research funded by corporations.

https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common

 

[Ibanez RG 350EX]

Science and academia used to be trustworthy but now its full of grifting and nonsense

It's always been full of grifting and nonsense, going at least back to Newton and the numerous faggy slapfights he got into with other scientists/mathematicians.

 

[TruffleSpark]

Replication studies are meant to weed out the fake science, trash science has always been a problem, but replication studies aren't getting funded these days so it's getting harder and harder to identify the trash science. Though to be fair studies that can't be replicated aren't always a result of deliberate misinformation, sometimes scientists just accidentally stumble on an outlier, and sometimes they do make honest mistakes. My point is, you're supposed to do the same thing over and over again. This is why the idea of "settled science" is silly, yes there are certain things that are so universally considered to be true that it seems silly to go against it, but even those things need to be able to withstand replication studies.

 

[R.U.N.]

I don’t think we should attempt to create life nor pursue in doing so, only horrid abominations awaits us.

 

[Duke Nukem]

Replication studies are meant to weed out the fake science, trash science has always been a problem, but replication studies aren't getting funded these days so it's getting harder and harder to identify the trash science. Though to be fair studies that can't be replicated aren't always a result of deliberate misinformation, sometimes scientists just accidentally stumble on an outlier, and sometimes they do make honest mistakes. My point is, you're supposed to do the same thing over and over again. This is why the idea of "settled science" is silly, yes there are certain things that are so universally considered to be true that it seems silly to go against it, but even those things need to be able to withstand replication studies.

Ironically, questioning science is literally how science fucking works.

Current Year "Science" is just a substitute for religion for demented leftards.

 

[Fathomless Eminence]

I just got back from studying this one african tribe that doesn't really raise a stink about men buttfucking eachother and acting all gay so basically where I'm going with this is biological sex doesn't exist and I would advise you to cut off your son's dick.

 

[peachlover669]

real or fake?

 

[JamusActimus]

I don’t think we should attempt to create life nor pursue in doing so, only horrid abominations awaits us.

Tell that to your mom

 

[Dagoth AMOGUS]

What is the most mad scientist thing you have ever done?

 

[R.U.N.]

Tell that to your mom

Just be glad I am not born a pajeet to shit up this website, it could be a lot worse for everyone.

Speaking of pajeets, do you know they were caught using artificial intelligence to make scientific papers a few months ago? Who couldn’t forget the artwork they made for them!

Spoiler: NSFW (literal AI rat dick LOL)

 

[latinlover]

Speaking of pajeets, do you know they were caught using artificial intelligence to make scientific papers a few months ago?

um akshually the rat balls AI paper was from chinks

 

[AgendaPoster]

Presented for esteemed thread's consideration, an image of 3 (three) boys will be boys science enjoyers!

 

[Buzz]

View attachment 6065863
real or fake?

You should change the text to include "intelligent life"

 

[peachlover669]

You should change the text to include "intelligent life"

im not trying to spread fake news

 

[Coldgrip]

What is the most mad scientist thing you have ever done?

One time I poured the milk into the bowl before the cereal.

 

[Otterly]

oh great another thinly veiled anti-science thread

The current state of most of the sciences is dire. The whole thing needs a spotlight shone on it and it need a whole load of skepticism and mockery (and a few mass hangings starting with the Covid culprits…)
There was a brief moment in the late nineties where evidence based everything looked like it would really get a foothold and then it was just extinguished. Back to money and politics and ideology dictating what it’s OK to look at or not.
At this point, 90% plus of it is worthless trash and needs to be razed to the ground