More crying about a dumb ad again.
Apparently simply giving information regarding an issue innately implies a speaker's position within said issue.
Also I forgot who this guy was, but I remember he was annoying.
Meanwhile, in the Surprise Sex Thread™:
Lowtax sounds like he's on the verge of snapping.
Although Lowtax disagrees. Or is that what he wants you to think?
"Youtube has videos of animals getting violently slaughtered and that's bannable on your own forums, so why not get rid of Youtube integration, too?"
These people keep arguing with Lowtax in the same way you'd watch a tennis player try to beat a brick wall. Except there's also about twenty other tennis players also simultaneously trying to beat the brick wall at tennis and all of them do not understand why they're never going to win.
At least I'm not the only one who thinks this:
If laughing ad angry people is a gimmick, then I guess Kiwifarms is just a one-trick pony.
Irony:
One user appreciates the irony and Lowtax is
absolutely clueless what they mean:
I know you're reading this, you big tease.
I know
you're reading this too. Why do you keep saying stupid things like this when you know it'll just get you screencapped and laughed at?
And there it is.
Why in the world would you think that, other person who I also know is reading this literally
right now?
"[C]lick on a banner ad for KF. [...] This is good, this is what I enjoy." -Lowtax