Like I said. We've been calling webshitters "engineers" for like a decade. Muta has passed the bar and then some. It's a very low bar.
I don't think anyone seriously cares about the legalities of representing yourself as an "engineer" in Canada. Rather, that just functions as a way to get back at Mutahar for acting like a faggot, which he likely has been on account of it seeming like he's been misrepresenting his level of technical expertise with computers.
For the amount of shit Muta has said over the years, I cannot recall him ever being plainly and confident wrong. Not like PirateSoftware, not anywhere close.
The main distinction I see between Mutahar and PirateSoftware is that Mald tries to enhance his lies by saying way, way too much, while Mutahar enhances his by saying absolutely nothing. At least this has been my experience watching videos on the SomeOrdinaryGamers channel. While Mutahar has not typically said anything outright wrong, he also has typically not said anything at all. Videos where he does discuss something technical usually involve him spending half the runtime fake laughing, backing himself into grammatical corners he can't escape, and constantly summarizing what he just said; the other half, for that matter, consists of regurgitating something someone has already said.
I think you are aware of this, so let me clarify why it matters. Your basic premise, as I understand it, is that the title "engineer" is effectively devoid of meaning. This is false: in spite of how it is used in industry, for an average person, it
does carry prestige (and indeed, prestige of a degree
above what it perhaps should be considering the people to whom it is often attached), and it
does mean something, namely
competence. The impression need not be accurate in order to exist. On the other hand, this is kind of besides the point. Mutahar could well have
never said the word "engineer" at any point, and he'd still be a liar, and people would still have good reason to be upset with him.
The crux of the violation is this: if an average person would be
surprised to find out that Mutahar e.g. can't code at all, failed to maintain an Arch installation, doesn't have an actual background in software, computing, cybersecurity, etc., then they've been misled. This makes Mutahar a liar, and furthermore, he has built much of his career on this deception. Personally, I feel it is very reasonable to make a big deal out of that on its own. There are concrete potential harms that can be cited as well, as has been done in previous posts in this thread, and another example (dug up by HarmfulOpinions) is Mutahar using his aura of having credentials to secure a sponsorship with Intel, misleading people into thinking a well-informed individual is endorsing their products.
