Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Military strategy is white supremacy.

image_2021-06-10_060103.png


Twitter link
Archive

Because in war you should TOTALLY let the enemy know you're coming over. After all, that's what we did at Normandy on D-Day, right? Oh wait...

(laughs in Sun Tzu and von Clausewitz)
 
Are you a white woman who's been raped? Sorry, you're a racist for reporting it and perpetuating abhorrent racism!

I want to know when Racism became more abhorrent than rape? When did it become such a heinous crime that we in the UK have 'illustrious ' charity actively suppressing white women who've been raped? I feel like screaming in the void when I read this insanity!


Screenshot_20210610-145518.png


" A lawyer today accused Oxfam of suggesting reporting rape is 'contemptible' after a training document said 'privileged white women' were supporting the 'root causes of sexual violence' for wanting offenders jailed because it disproportionately affects minorities.

The charity, which has been hit by a slew of sex scandals including claims that employees used teenage prostitutes in Haiti, compiled the PowerPoint presentation through its LGBT network after the group complained to bosses that the debate about women's rights was part of a 'patriarchal and white supremacist narrative'.

Accompanied by a cartoon of a crying white woman, the PowerPoint claims that mainstream feminism supports 'the root causes of sexual violence' by painting white women as 'victims' and that this in turn justifies excessive punishment for 'black and other marginalised people'.

Naomi Cunningham, a discrimination and employment law barrister, said the training - which uses extracts from a book written by Sussex University gender studies professor Alison Phipps - had shocking implications.

'The message seems to be that a woman who reports a rape or sexual assault to the police and presses charges is a contemptible ''white feminist'',' she told The Telegraph.

She added: 'I think any woman could make an arguable case that this has created or contributed to ''an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment'', which is how the Equality Act defines harassment.'

The
four-week 'learning journey' states: 'Mainstream feminism centres privileged white women and demands that ''bad men'' be fired or imprisoned.'

Next to the cartoon of a sobbing white woman is a caption saying that this attitude 'legitimises criminal punishment, harming black and other marginalised people'.

The PowerPoint recommends staff read Me Not You: The Trouble with Mainstream Feminism, a book by Alison Phipps, a professor of gender studies at Sussex University.

It then links to the academic's Twitter account, including a thread which summarises the main themes of the book, including: 'White feminist tears deploy white woundedness, and the sympathy it generates, to hide the harms we perpetuate through white supremacy.'

Summarising the theme of her book, Professor Phipps states: 'Mainstream feminism is supporting, not undoing, the root causes of sexual violence.'

Oxfam has insisted the training was voluntary, and included links to 'suggested reading to help in understanding the issues' that did not reflect Oxfam's views or policy.

Meanwhile, Frank Furedi, emeritus professor of sociology at Kent University, suggested that the book carried the message that the 'colour of your skin symbolises original sin'.

The training, called Learning About Trans Rights and Inclusion, was drawn up in 2020.

It was compiled after the charity's LGBT+ network wrote to management demanding that they publicly support trans people and claimed that debate about rights was part of a 'patriarchal and white supremacist narrative' used by the far right.

Alison Phipps told MailOnline today: 'I can't comment on the Oxfam training materials as I haven't seen them, but my book is grounded in a long tradition of feminist thought and politics that sees criminal punishment as part of the problem and not the solution.

'I would never tell a survivor of sexual violence what to do, but I would like us to have better choices than criminal punishment, media exposure, or silence. "

So now they're condoning the rape of white woman...
 
This "disproportionately affects" bullshit is insidiously evil. Could it possibly be that they commit more crime? No, it's just racism!
 
No way, are they seriously going to tell white women who have happened to be raped by a minority to shut up because “muh racism”? White men are you going to allow them to treat you’re own women that way? But then again these are the same women who insist they strong independent fierce feminists who don’t need no man so maybe they can figure it out for themselves.
 
Are you a white woman who's been raped? Sorry, you're a racist for reporting it and perpetuating abhorrent racism!

I want to know when Racism became more abhorrent than rape? When did it become such a heinous crime that we in the UK have 'illustrious ' charity actively suppressing white women who've been raped? I feel like screaming in the void when I read this insanity!


View attachment 2249641

" A lawyer today accused Oxfam of suggesting reporting rape is 'contemptible' after a training document said 'privileged white women' were supporting the 'root causes of sexual violence' for wanting offenders jailed because it disproportionately affects minorities.

The charity, which has been hit by a slew of sex scandals including claims that employees used teenage prostitutes in Haiti, compiled the PowerPoint presentation through its LGBT network after the group complained to bosses that the debate about women's rights was part of a 'patriarchal and white supremacist narrative'.

Accompanied by a cartoon of a crying white woman, the PowerPoint claims that mainstream feminism supports 'the root causes of sexual violence' by painting white women as 'victims' and that this in turn justifies excessive punishment for 'black and other marginalised people'.

Naomi Cunningham, a discrimination and employment law barrister, said the training - which uses extracts from a book written by Sussex University gender studies professor Alison Phipps - had shocking implications.

'The message seems to be that a woman who reports a rape or sexual assault to the police and presses charges is a contemptible ''white feminist'',' she told The Telegraph.

She added: 'I think any woman could make an arguable case that this has created or contributed to ''an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment'', which is how the Equality Act defines harassment.'

The
four-week 'learning journey' states: 'Mainstream feminism centres privileged white women and demands that ''bad men'' be fired or imprisoned.'

Next to the cartoon of a sobbing white woman is a caption saying that this attitude 'legitimises criminal punishment, harming black and other marginalised people'.

The PowerPoint recommends staff read Me Not You: The Trouble with Mainstream Feminism, a book by Alison Phipps, a professor of gender studies at Sussex University.

It then links to the academic's Twitter account, including a thread which summarises the main themes of the book, including: 'White feminist tears deploy white woundedness, and the sympathy it generates, to hide the harms we perpetuate through white supremacy.'

Summarising the theme of her book, Professor Phipps states: 'Mainstream feminism is supporting, not undoing, the root causes of sexual violence.'

Oxfam has insisted the training was voluntary, and included links to 'suggested reading to help in understanding the issues' that did not reflect Oxfam's views or policy.

Meanwhile, Frank Furedi, emeritus professor of sociology at Kent University, suggested that the book carried the message that the 'colour of your skin symbolises original sin'.

The training, called Learning About Trans Rights and Inclusion, was drawn up in 2020.

It was compiled after the charity's LGBT+ network wrote to management demanding that they publicly support trans people and claimed that debate about rights was part of a 'patriarchal and white supremacist narrative' used by the far right.

Alison Phipps told MailOnline today: 'I can't comment on the Oxfam training materials as I haven't seen them, but my book is grounded in a long tradition of feminist thought and politics that sees criminal punishment as part of the problem and not the solution.

'I would never tell a survivor of sexual violence what to do, but I would like us to have better choices than criminal punishment, media exposure, or silence. "

So now they're condoning the rape of white woman...

White Women?

Dude, they let THOUSANDS of their children be assraped by Sandniggers over 40 years because arresting the sandniggers would let people call them racist.

This is STILL going on, to the point that parents in the UK don't let their kids go to pools anymore because some sandnigger will openly molest the kids in the pool and the police won't do shit about it.

This is just them trying to codify "sandniggers rape people it's just something they do and we can't ask them to stop" as unofficial policy. It's the "well they're just niggers you can't expect them to obey laws" of the UK now.

I would like to think, as cucked as America is, if we found out a thousand+ children had been assraped by sandniggers, there would be some ethnic ghettos cleared out by lead and fire before some California diversity tourist could explain to us how it's their culture and the kids probably wanted it.
 
Military strategy is white supremacy.

View attachment 2249437

Twitter link
Archive

Because in war you should TOTALLY let the enemy know you're coming over. After all, that's what we did at Normandy on D-Day, right? Oh wait...

(laughs in Sun Tzu and von Clausewitz)
I love that Nikole Hannah-Jones' lasting 1619 Project legacy is to help a million competing projects spring up (1620 Project; 1776 Project; 1836 Project). Good going.
 
Back
Top Bottom