Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[PurpleEater]

but..."they" is typically used in the plural, so when you say "they" while you've been discussing multiple people, it's fucking confusing. yes, it CAN be used occasionally in the singular ("the plumber is coming over later, please let them in"), but it's never the exclusive pronoun for someone (until Clown World, of course).

except....cheerleader outfits are not purely made for erotic purposes. they're often fetishized, sure, but they're constructed for a sport, not just to fuck in a glory hole while doing poppers. lingerie is just underwear, and the sexual stuff can be awkward to discuss with kids, but they don't need to know EVERYTHING about why Daddy likes Mommy in crotchless panties, jfc.

what? leather daddies ARE ALL ABOUT KINK. sure you can wear leather without being into it sexually but god damn, this is a reach.

this strikes me as someone who thinks this picture book is "cute" and "normal:"

(for reference, it's from THIS DAY IN JUNE by Gayle E. Pitman)

 

[SITHRAK!]

"The right does not offer any kind of competing ideology to the left."

Translation: we’ve had thirty five years of constantly demonizing everything conservative, to the point where expressing conservative opinions can cost you your career. I’m parading my viewpoint for social media asspats because only the left is allowed to openly discuss their political views in the public arena. And that’s the way I like it.

No one should give a shit about her backstory this much

Well it was at least interesting to see Hank Hill in a wedding dress at the one minute mark, I tell you hwat.

 

[Sustainable War]

A bit late, but FYI

Bruh, that violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

It actually doesn't. Casting calls have had exemption from day 1.

FindLaw's United States Eleventh Circuit case and opinions.

FindLaw's searchable database of United States Eleventh Circuit decisions since

caselaw.findlaw.com

The District Court expressed some concern that its decision “might well prevent advertisers from employing, based on race, actors to solicit products to a certain group.”   This conclusion, however, does not necessarily follow.   A film director casting a movie about African-American slaves may not exclude Caucasians from the auditions, but the director may limit certain roles to persons having the physical characteristics of African-Americans.   Indeed, the drafters of Title VII expressly anticipated this issue.   In their interpretative memorandum, Senators Case and Clark explained that[a]lthough there is no exemption in Title VII for occupations in which race might be deemed a bona fide job qualification, a director of a play or movie who wished to cast an actor in the role of a Negro, could specify that he wished to hire someone with the physical appearance of a Negro.110 Cong. Rec. 7213, 7217 (1964) (emphasis added).   See also Miller, 615 F.2d at 654 (suggesting that a director wishing to cast the role of Henry VIII may announce that only applicants of sufficient physical likeness to Henry VIII will be considered).   As applied here, TPG could have legally assigned jobs based on accent, speech pattern or dialect, but not expressly on race.Although the statutory language allows gender to be a valid BFOQ for hiring an actor or actress where it is necessary for the “purpose of authenticity or genuineness,” see 29 C.F.R. § 1604.2(a)(2), Congress specifically rejected race as a BFOQ. See generally 110 Cong. Rec. 2550-63 (1964) (House discussion on inclusion of race and color in the BFOQ exception).

You can dig through the congressional records, but I don't feel autistic enough to do that right now.

Every year there's one or two articles or blogshits from some z-list failed actor about how modern casting calls can be amusingly obtuse.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

View attachment 2189363

but..."they" is typically used in the plural, so when you say "they" while you've been discussing multiple people, it's fucking confusing. yes, it CAN be used occasionally in the singular ("the plumber is coming over later, please let them in"), but it's never the exclusive pronoun for someone (until Clown World, of course).

View attachment 2189381

except....cheerleader outfits are not purely made for erotic purposes. they're often fetishized, sure, but they're constructed for a sport, not just to fuck in a glory hole while doing poppers. lingerie is just underwear, and the sexual stuff can be awkward to discuss with kids, but they don't need to know EVERYTHING about why Daddy likes Mommy in crotchless panties, jfc.

View attachment 2189402

what? leather daddies ARE ALL ABOUT KINK. sure you can wear leather without being into it sexually but god damn, this is a reach.

View attachment 2189404

this strikes me as someone who thinks this picture book is "cute" and "normal:"

View attachment 2189408

(for reference, it's from THIS DAY IN JUNE by Gayle E. Pitman)

They're emotionally retarded, stuck frozen at eternally 8-13 years old. They're also extreme coomers, with literally their entire lives and very identities orbiting around what makes their feminine penises twitch. This doesn't make them immune to the urge to have a family, though, so they get weird mutated ideas of childhood (because they refuse to grow up, and because they subconsciously want kids, but they can't grow up to be parents) which mutates into shit like "Queer Kids Stuff," "Big Mouth," and "Cuties," which in their mind is celebrating childhood (which they think they remember despite being perverted coomers for more than half their lives) and would be good for children (which some of them aren't allowed within 500 yards of).

So what I'm saying is I'm sure they think a bunch of gay dudes exposing themselves to children and wearing perverted sexual costumes in public is just fucking dandy, because it makes their dick twitch (which means it's an inherently good thing) and society pandering to them for decades has given them a huge entitlement complex (which means if they enjoy it then you owe it to them to let them do it).

But yeah, if "queer people" NEED to be able to prance around in fetish costumes and wave their sexuality in people's faces to celebrate their Arrogance -- sorry, "Pride" -- then hey, that's cool.

But if that's the case, bringing children to one of those events is, by the literal definition, child abuse and should result in an immediate arrest and investigation of the parents.

You cannot shove perversion and sexuality into your lifestyle parade and still try and pretend it's appropriate for all ages. No, gimp suits and bondage gear are not a fundamental part of being gay -- they just make you fucking horny and your stupid arrogant coomer asses have spent so long pretending being told no is a literal hate crime that you've forgotten what it means to be a sane human being.

And for the love of god will these stupid fucking coomer faggots stop proving the 1980s religious right correct? Seriously every fucking stereotype and red flag they raised 30 years ago has come true, up to and including these nutjobs trying to make diddling kids into a civil rights issue.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

They're also extreme coomers, with literally their entire lives and very identities orbiting around what makes their feminine penises twitch.

Why be an incel orbiting your oneitis when you can just troon out, become your own oneitis, and be an incel orbiting yourself?

You, incel, are the one you’ve been waiting for!

 

[Capsaicin Addict]

A bit late, but FYI

It actually doesn't. Casting calls have had exemption from day 1.

FindLaw's United States Eleventh Circuit case and opinions.

FindLaw's searchable database of United States Eleventh Circuit decisions since

caselaw.findlaw.com

You can dig through the congressional records, but I don't feel autistic enough to do that right now.

Every year there's one or two articles or blogshits from some z-list failed actor about how modern casting calls can be amusingly obtuse.

That one may get fought over in courts. You can make the argument for an actor that you need 'X color, Y gender, Z body type' to portray a given character sufficiently. But I seriously doubt you need the same qualities for a puppeteer.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

That one may get fought over in courts. You can make the argument for an actor that you need 'X color, Y gender, Z body type' to portray a given character sufficiently. But I seriously doubt you need the same qualities for a puppeteer.

That article lol.

Of course an ad looking for a coder wouldn’t say they’re looking for a MILF. But if the role is a MILF, then being able to play a MILF is as critical here as being able to code is for the former. And the short fat best friend type should be glad she’s getting work, not complaining about the kind of work she gets. Get into an industry where the qualities readily observed externally - face, body, voice - are not *the primary considerations* in hiring.

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

except....cheerleader outfits are not purely made for erotic purposes. they're often fetishized, sure, but they're constructed for a sport, not just to fuck in a glory hole while doing poppers. lingerie is just underwear, and the sexual stuff can be awkward to discuss with kids, but they don't need to know EVERYTHING about why Daddy likes Mommy in crotchless panties, jfc.

Yeah, exactly most of these are super easy to explain and mostly are so normal that they don't need explanation anyway but if the kid ask it's not hard.

"That's an add for women's underwear. Women wear underwear like you but also they wear bras because women have breast and they have bras to support them. This picture shows how this bra does that and what it looks like."

"That's a cheerleader outfit, cheerleaders do performances to entertain people in sport shows. It looks like that because a cheerleaders do acrobatic tricks as a team so they wear clothes that are very easy to move in and that show who is part of the team."

"Suit and tie? They are something men wear to look fancy, kinda like when mommy wears a nice dress. Suits are cut emphasize what make men look handsome, so most men look nice in them. Ties are used give little more color to the outfit."

None of that is a lie. The explanation might gloss over the erotic aspects but as that is rarely the point of those clothes like in fetish gear it isn't uncomfortable at all.

 

[AmazingEagle]

View attachment 2189363

but..."they" is typically used in the plural, so when you say "they" while you've been discussing multiple people, it's fucking confusing. yes, it CAN be used occasionally in the singular ("the plumber is coming over later, please let them in"), but it's never the exclusive pronoun for someone (until Clown World, of course).

View attachment 2189381

except....cheerleader outfits are not purely made for erotic purposes. they're often fetishized, sure, but they're constructed for a sport, not just to fuck in a glory hole while doing poppers. lingerie is just underwear, and the sexual stuff can be awkward to discuss with kids, but they don't need to know EVERYTHING about why Daddy likes Mommy in crotchless panties, jfc.

View attachment 2189402

what? leather daddies ARE ALL ABOUT KINK. sure you can wear leather without being into it sexually but god damn, this is a reach.

View attachment 2189404

this strikes me as someone who thinks this picture book is "cute" and "normal:"

View attachment 2189408

(for reference, it's from THIS DAY IN JUNE by Gayle E. Pitman)

Bruh, we don't want to ban gay people from attending a pride parade we just want to ban people from dressing like strippers in public.

 

[mr.moon1488]

Here's an Army ad:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=MIYGFSONKbk

Sad part is that since she's a pog there's no chance of her getting blown up by an IED.

 

[AnOminous]

And if you just read his stories you’re really not going to pick up on any racist shit. There’s maybe one story (the one about the town collapsing on the immigrant people) that you can get a view into his psyche with. It’s also not even a good story so who cares.

Well there's the one where the horrifying twist is SHE WAS A NIGGER!

Marceline was a negress.

Literally the twist ending to Lovecraft's most overtly racist story.

 

[Cryonic Haunted Bullets]

View attachment 2187953

There's a lot of speculation that Lovecraft really was terrified of anything that wasn't white, Protestant, from Rhode Island, etc. Not 'hate', actual fear.

I honestly think he tried to acclimatize to it, because I can't imagine any other reason he would've moved to NYC during that time period, wife or not.

It's always "Lovecraft's racism" with these people... no mention of his genuinely awesome redemption arc.

 

[Josterman]

It's always "Lovecraft's racism" with these people... no mention of his genuinely awesome redemption arc.

View attachment 2189964

They are hacks and self projection their bigotry on others

I found this SJW

He did this three other times

and yes he has A thread dedicated to him

https://embed.kiwifarms.st/threads/majid-m-padellan-mmpadellan-brooklyndad_defiant.86358/

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

if the kid ask it's not hard.

It's the same for guys in bondage outfits.
”Mum, what's that guy wearing?”
”He's a nonce. Stay away from him, and if he tries to give you sweets tell an adult.”

 

[Slap47]

Is Anonymous on Twitter all just astroturfing or something?

 

[Alessonincrippliningdepre]

View attachment 2189363

but..."they" is typically used in the plural, so when you say "they" while you've been discussing multiple people, it's fucking confusing. yes, it CAN be used occasionally in the singular ("the plumber is coming over later, please let them in"), but it's never the exclusive pronoun for someone (until Clown World, of course).

View attachment 2189381

except....cheerleader outfits are not purely made for erotic purposes. they're often fetishized, sure, but they're constructed for a sport, not just to fuck in a glory hole while doing poppers. lingerie is just underwear, and the sexual stuff can be awkward to discuss with kids, but they don't need to know EVERYTHING about why Daddy likes Mommy in crotchless panties, jfc.

View attachment 2189402

what? leather daddies ARE ALL ABOUT KINK. sure you can wear leather without being into it sexually but god damn, this is a reach.

View attachment 2189404

this strikes me as someone who thinks this picture book is "cute" and "normal:"

View attachment 2189408

(for reference, it's from THIS DAY IN JUNE by Gayle E. Pitman)

https://mobile.twitter.com/fuchs1apunk/status/1395106014987440130

 

[stupid moron]

Well there's the one where the horrifying twist is SHE WAS A NIGGER!



Literally the twist ending to Lovecraft's most overtly racist story.

People just can’t appreciate a good twist ending

 

[EnemyStand]

It's always "Lovecraft's racism" with these people... no mention of his genuinely awesome redemption arc.

View attachment 2189964

They do not believe in forgiveness. If you said anything to contradict their agenda, you must be expunged. Only the most powerful members of their group can avoid it, because those people have the backing of the media.

 

[Josterman]

I found this lady again

 

[Moral Decay]

View attachment 2190815

Is Anonymous on Twitter all just astroturfing or something?

However they justify, they are still paying into and perpetuating a capitalistic society in perpetuity. It's not mandatory; they could save up money and pay an upfront cost to go off-grid and self-sufficient.

They could even make a commune out of it. The hippies did it, and some might have done okay (hint: getting everyone to share is easiest with low numbers). But these internet commie LARPers are less competent than literal boomers that wanted to sit around, smoke pot, and sing kumbayah all day.