Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1593086889645.png

1593086936438.png
 
Case in point: Elizabeth Warren. That said, when you favor minorities and use the one-drop rule, you're gonna get a lot of homeopathic minorities. Incentives and all that.

Could it work the other way? Will a black man don't get incentives thanks to the one-drop rule, he have whitey ancestry and then he'll react like Nia Hope?


I guess she didn't saw the various videos posted on Liveleak, WorldStarHipHop, Bitchute, etc... like this one for example.
 
I would wager any rational, sane human would agree that racism is bad and we shouldn't intentionally hurt each other. I think most people would also agree that those who do evil things should be cast out of society or kept away from more peaceful members. These nu-Woke Activists talk down to anyone who isn't as dogmatically "woke" (code: brainwashed) as they are as if we are all morally akin to cannibalistic warlords, and it's solely through their own social media sperging that people's eyes will be opened and humanity itself will be "saved."

This is why I think most whites have such a problem with BLM and other similar groups. Most people would agree wholeheartedly that the police shouldn't immediately open fire on a black (or any color) person who shoplifted a bag of chips from Dollar Tree or someone driving with a suspended license.

The implication from BLM is that cops should have never under any circumstances ever questioned the black person's actions in the first place and even if they catch them red-handed, they need to walk away and mind their own business. Someone awhile back online posted that even if Tamir Rice's gun was real, the person who saw him playing with it had no business even reporting it! He dindu nuffin! Wypipo need to mind dey bidness! Apparently if this kid's parents didn't keep an eye on him, that white bitch shouldn't have either. Tumblr logic at it's finest.

It's that sense of implied lawlessness for blacks that turns most people off of BLM. They don't want equality, they want to fuck with people and get out of it via "muh oppression".
 
Last edited:
This is why I think most whites have such a problem with BLM and other similar groups. Most people would agree wholeheartedly that the police shouldn't immediately open fire on a black (or any color) person who shoplifted a bag of chips from Dollar Tree or someone driving with a suspended license.
blm is listenandbelieve but for blacks
just do what WE want
and when we say our fee-fees are hurt, just accept it
don't think
just consoom product and get excited for more product

wait a minute...
 
I was tempted to go off on this since I see some of my favorite characters in here, but then I saw this
Consider growing up and stop watching cartoons.
And remembered it doesn't actually matter. These are cartoons, and the person who made this can't tell cartoons from real life.
 
This tweet can easily be counteracted by five pictures of Phil (ADF).

And guys, if you ever cracked an edgy joke, you are supporting the kidnapping, torture, and murder of a nameless transwoman who had lived a happy life in CHAZ:
View attachment 1404649
As for the "really violent" replies that Nerdskull wants you to look at, here is a small sample:
View attachment 1404654
Did this even happen? I searched for it, and all I can find is this tweet, other tweets replying to it and a single Reddit post linking back to this tweet. I'd think a trans woman being kidnapped and tortured by Proud Boys would make it to at least one news site, but there's just nothing.

Don't get me wrong, maybe it did happen and the news hasn't caught up with it yet, in which case whoever's responsible should be prosecuted. But, when all I can find on the story are a bunch of unsourced tweets, it makes it seem like you're just trying to make the Proud Boys look bad, which is silly because they do a fine job of making themselves look bad without your help and lying about them is only going to bolster them.


Screen Shot 2020-06-25 at 11.32.40 AM.png


Yeah. K.
 
Last edited:
Truly exceptional content from Instagram today. The e-begging isn't even coded anymore.
"Reparations is a lifelong practice"?! So they're outright stating that I'm eternally branded with sin and will never be forgiven? To think I was told that reparations wasn't about taking away my money and giving them to black people simply because they're black. Not that I ever believed the person in question...
 
Why are imbeciles trying to insert children's cartoons into serious, adult political discourse? And why aren't they ashamed to be such imbeciles?

They're desperate to be seen as mature and smart, and the only way they can do that is by trying to lift up their cartoons into some perceived level of validity by talking about them like that nonstop.

Somebody probably once told them that they're childish because of the media they like, and they internalized that so much that the only way they could respond was by trying to slap a thick layer of psuedo-intellectual bullshit over everything they watch/read/play.

I call this Moviebob Syndrome.
 
Ah yes, this shit. CNN had someone write an article along a similar line. That person actually concluded that black people can be racist... against other black people. That's the premise that both of them are working from, that the only racism is against black people. Nevermind racism against whites, these people don't think racism against Arabs, Asians, etc exists (unless a white person does it, then the rules change), and don't think a black person can ever hold systemic power, no matter how rich or socially or politically important they are or that a white person can ever not hold systemic power, no matter how broke or marginalized they are (not that they'll admit there are any circumstances where a white person could be marginalized). People like this are such zealots that there's really no good talking to them, except to expose how batshit they are and it's disturbing how mainstream their beliefs are.

This is why I think most whites have such a problem with BLM and other similar groups. Most people would agree wholeheartedly that the police shouldn't immediately open fire on a black (or any color) person who shoplifted a bag of chips from Dollar Tree or someone driving with a suspended license.

The implication from BLM is that cops should have never under any circumstances ever questioned the black person's actions in the first place and even if they catch them red-handed, they need to walk away and mind their own business. Someone awhile back online that even if Tamir Rice's gun was real, the person who saw him playing with it had no business even reporting it! He dindu nuffin! Wypipo need to mind dey bidness! Apparently if this kid's parents didn't keep an eye on him, that white bitch shouldn't have either. Tumblr logic at it's finest.

It's that sense of implied lawlessness for blacks that turns most people off of BLM. They don't want equality, they want to fuck with people and get out of it via "muh oppression".
Case in point: the Rayshard Brooks vs Garrett Rolf incident. There are actually people on Tumblr justifying Brooks' actions with the argument that the cops shouldn't have tried to arrest him in the first place for driving drunk, passing out in a Wendy's drive thru, and trying to flee the scene (because he's black although they don't say that, they'd never argue this for a white dude). And now that Rolf is on trial for felony murder for self defense against Brooks for assaulting the officers, it seems like some parts of the US legal system agree.

Do anime characters with weird eye and hair colors trigger these people?
Yes. And I suspect for a lot of them it's because they secretly prefer lighter hair and eyes, and modern far left racial politics make that not okay.

Don't get me wrong, maybe it did happen and the news hasn't caught up with it yet, in which case whoever's responsible should be prosecuted. But, when all I can find on the story are a bunch of unsourced tweets, it makes it seem like you're just trying to make the Proud Boys look bad, which is silly because they do a fine job of making themselves look bad without your help and lying about them is only going to bolster them.
They've been lying about the Proud Boys from day one by saying they're fascist and white supremacist when they're not. Why not make up accusations of actual, specific crimes now? The Proud Boys are already swamped in legal fees and Gavin McInnes, who basically bailed on them, is the only one with any money, so the chances they'll sue for libel are low. The funniest part is that this is clearly a race swap of the so called "BLM torture" incident where a group of hoodrats kidnapped and tortured a mentally disabled man for wearing a MAGA hat, and uploaded the video to Facebook, which actually happened.

With the media being like flies on shit to any sort of crime they can deem white supremacist, even when they're fake or not white supremacist at least three quarters of the time, there is no fucking way I believe this happened and didn't immediately unleash a media firestorm.

"Reparations is a lifelong practice"?! So they're outright stating that I'm eternally branded with sin and will never be forgiven?
Yes. Hasn't every word these idpol racial activists, white or black, said, made that abundantly clear? It's a very well defined ideology that's essentially a racist version of original sin.

People need to make a point of calling these people racist now. I'm certainly going to. Don't waste a lot of time elaborating or defending the label either (except with that "change some definitions" meme), because that just makes it look like you're unsure of it. They're all about as racist as Boxershorts47, just on the other side, and it's completely socially accepted.
 
Back
Top Bottom