Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
At the same time these hipsters wear bindis and get tattoos of other cultures symbols too. These are seen as big issues though because 'gotta fight the whites!'. Just because someone from one culture may not care much for mine and wants to wear the symbols from it, let them. We've already changed so much due to technology and other things, I don't put on my formalwear and go to concertos just because my culture used to. Let things interlock and flow together in my opinion. I'm glad I can go and read about all the things that countries used to do and believe, but now we're connected and we can evolve a new culture together.
I don't think it has to be a binary decision between "accept everything" or "accept nothing". There are some things that people claim are cultural appropriation that obviously aren't, they're just cultural exchanges. And then there are some things that are offensive caricatures of foreign cultures.

Basically, I think it's OK to accept Eminem and, at the same time, find this sort of thing offensive.

Now, speaking of bindis, people seem to get pissy because they're becoming a fashion accessory. That is the stupidest shit to complain about. See, the basic argument is that bindis have religious significance, so it's offensive to treat it so casually. And yeah, taken at face value, I can get behind that argument. Like if mcdonalds in japan started giving away crucifix toys with red markers so you could paint the blood onto the wounds of christ. That's pretty offensive too.

But the thing is: bindis are already worn by non-hindus in southeast asia. No one complains about that. No one complains that Bangladesh is appropriating hindu culture.

To me, once we've reached that point, I don't care anymore. Until hindus start protesting all the non-hindu women in southeast asia appropriating bindis, I don't care about it happening in the US.
 
I wonder if SJWs are even aware of thier hypocrisy.

It's not racism if its against white people.
White people don't have a culture to approaitate from.
Women can't be sexist

It boggles the mind.

"It happened in the past, so it's totally justified to treat white people/men/etc like shit!"
The purpose of learning about history (at least in my opinion) is to learn from past mistakes, not repeat them.

Also, do celebrity SJWS count for this (I know Anita Sarkessian and Azealia Banks) too? I only can imagine so.

Azealia Banks recently did an interview with Playboy saying that she hates white people and America (although she generalized the country via looking at the Midwest). What a winner.
(Sorry if this has been brought up before by the way)
 
I wonder if SJWs are even aware of thier hypocrisy.

It's not racism if its against white people.
White people don't have a culture to approaitate from.
Women can't be sexist

It boggles the mind.

They are aware, but their cultural studies tutors assure them it doesn't matter because privilege.
 
I feel like this is relevant:


Today Obama spoke out against producers, distributers, etc. self-censoring to appease the sensibilities of people who "probably need to be offended" and that self-censorship is "not what America is about".

So basically, he just shit on SJW culture. I'm surprised, I thought he was more leaning to their views.
 
I feel like this is relevant:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=DlajdEapQLo
Today Obama spoke out against producers, distributers, etc. self-censoring to appease the sensibilities of people who "probably need to be offended" and that self-censorship is "not what America is about".

So basically, he just shit on SJW culture. I'm surprised, I thought he was more leaning to their views.
Does this mean I can say "THANKS OBAMA" and actually mean it this time?
 
I feel like this is relevant:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=DlajdEapQLo
Today Obama spoke out against producers, distributers, etc. self-censoring to appease the sensibilities of people who "probably need to be offended" and that self-censorship is "not what America is about".

So basically, he just shit on SJW culture. I'm surprised, I thought he was more leaning to their views.
I wonder how the far right are going to respond to this given how adamant they are of going against everything he says.

Azealia Banks recently did an interview with Playboy saying that she hates white people and America (although she generalized the country via looking at the Midwest). What a winner.
(Sorry if this has been brought up before by the way)

Remember when Lauren Hill shot her own career in the foot for saying that she'd rather let her son die than let a white person buy her albums?
 
I feel like this is relevant:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=DlajdEapQLo
Today Obama spoke out against producers, distributers, etc. self-censoring to appease the sensibilities of people who "probably need to be offended" and that self-censorship is "not what America is about".

So basically, he just shit on SJW culture. I'm surprised, I thought he was more leaning to their views.
Holy fucking shit...that made sense. Wow. So refreshing to hear that some people acknowledge that sometimes people need to be offended. What was the context of his speech? I saw one of the comments say it was in context of Sony pulling the Interview.
 
Despite how FoxNews likes to paint him, Obama is very moderate and slightly right leaning on a lot of issues. ObamaCare is really just the Republican alternative to national healthcare that was floated about during the Clinton era and implemented by Romney in his state.

Well, went off tangent there, but a lot of SJW already don't like Obama because he's not liberal enough for them, but also won't say anything because he's a PoC. So they'll ignore it like they do with everything else he does that they don't like.
 
There was bound to be blow back at some point; you can only shit on cultural norms for so long before you annoy more people then you have on your side.

Plus SJW's are now so far from what they started out to be they're practically caricatures of themselves.
 
I wonder how the far right are going to respond to this given how adamant they are of going against everything he says.

I'm pretty sure at least part of what he's talking about is directed towards WASPs acting like Christianity is under perpetual siege, so they're going to do what they always do, I guess.

It's dog person centric and wheelz is a shitlord who runs a bbs for pedos, stalkers, and MRAs.

wow how dare you minimize dogkin you fucking triggering shitlord WEVE BEEN INVISIBLE FOR YEARS

At the same time these hipsters wear bindis and get tattoos of other cultures symbols too. These are seen as big issues though because 'gotta fight the whites!'. Just because someone from one culture may not care much for mine and wants to wear the symbols from it, let them.

I remember when all the cool kids used to wear keffiyehs and do it really wrong.
 
Time for some "Why I need Feminism" giggles.
1423505770347.jpg
tumblr_mi2cm37CeH1r1i1sao1_500.jpg
white man sword.jpg
1360241949888.jpg
1423495074620.jpg
1423592918922.jpg
 
I don't think it has to be a binary decision between "accept everything" or "accept nothing". There are some things that people claim are cultural appropriation that obviously aren't, they're just cultural exchanges. And then there are some things that are offensive caricatures of foreign cultures.

Basically, I think it's OK to accept Eminem and, at the same time, find this sort of thing offensive.

Now, speaking of bindis, people seem to get pissy because they're becoming a fashion accessory. That is the stupidest shit to complain about. See, the basic argument is that bindis have religious significance, so it's offensive to treat it so casually. And yeah, taken at face value, I can get behind that argument. Like if mcdonalds in japan started giving away crucifix toys with red markers so you could paint the blood onto the wounds of christ. That's pretty offensive too.

But the thing is: bindis are already worn by non-hindus in southeast asia. No one complains about that. No one complains that Bangladesh is appropriating hindu culture.

To me, once we've reached that point, I don't care anymore. Until hindus start protesting all the non-hindu women in southeast asia appropriating bindis, I don't care about it happening in the US.
I read somewhere that most of the bindis people wear are not the same as the religious ones and are pretty much just fashion accessories in india too.
Azealia Banks
I had no idea who she is but I'd like to see her go through her day letting all the white people she depends on hear that, from whatever music execs she interacts with to the guy selling her a hotdog on the corner. "Just know I don't like white people... or america really"
How is it people are given leeway to say this shit?

Oh god my pimply faced cherub nobody will ever mistake you for manley don't worry. Also forgive me for mistaking you for an ugly girl while wearing clothing designed to shape you like a girl. Also even if someone thought your corset was "asking for it", rest assured pat, your corset will be denied.
 
What the hell is the candle supposed to be used for?

Also, this seems like something that a lot of native owned casinos would sell to gullible out of state tourists.;)

It sounds like absolute garbage sold by two genuinely repulsive hipster douchebags.

Also note, some of those "tribes" that run casinos have pedigrees of substantially questionable legitimacy. I'd give the Mashantucket "Pequots" who run Foxwoods as an example.
 
To me, once we've reached that point, I don't care anymore. Until hindus start protesting all the non-hindu women in southeast asia appropriating bindis, I don't care about it happening in the US.
You're forgetting, they're mostly only aware of the most superficial aspects of these things. They don't know that there's a difference between Indian, Bangladeshi, Pakistani etc.
All they see is a brown person wearing a bindi. So they must therefore be a Hindu.
 
I feel like this is relevant:

Today Obama spoke out against producers, distributers, etc. self-censoring to appease the sensibilities of people who "probably need to be offended" and that self-censorship is "not what America is about".

So basically, he just shit on SJW culture. I'm surprised, I thought he was more leaning to their views.

His academic specialisation/teaching interest was constitutional law. No one fucks with the First Amendment. The First Amendment is like clean, safe drinking water. Sometimes we might think "That dickbag doesn't deserve any, they use it so badly", but we would all be so fucking boned without it that we defend the right of even the dickbags to have it to the last gasp.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/30/us/politics/30law.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 - throwing this in for general interest
 
Back
Top Bottom