🐱 So much for ‘Biden the socialist’ - Based?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


We should keep track of the Republican lies if only because they are destined to be repeated in future elections. In this case, I am not talking about The Lie (that President-elect Joe Biden stole the election), but about the other lazy attack Republicans deploy against virtually any Democrat: They are socialists!
We heard that gibe continually during the 2020 campaign. We continue to hear it from right-wing, anti-democratic Republicans, who shriek that voting for a 50-50 split in the Senate by electing Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock in the Georgia Senate runoff elections will summon — you guessed it — the rise of socialism and downfall of American capitalism. Poppycock.
Given Biden’s record on everything from the Iraq War to the 1994 crime bill to his campaign rhetoric opposing Medicare-for-all, Republican fear-mongering about a radical Democratic administration never made sense. And certainly, a party that no longer believes in the sanctity of elections and democratic self-government loses all credibility in identifying “radicals.”
Still, it’s worth pointing out that since the election, it has become even more apparent how moderate Biden really is. There is not a single super-progressive among his Cabinet and senior staff picks. To the contrary, his national security team is imbued with a bipartisan vision of international leadership, not a left- or right-wing call for retrenchment. His economic team, with veterans of the Obama administration including Janet Yellen as treasury secretary and serious economists at the Council of Economic Advisers, consists not of soak-the-rich socialists but center-left reformers whose most radical idea might be raising the federal minimum wage (as many states and cities have already done). Whatever you think of retired Gen. Lloyd Austin III, Biden’s pick to lead the Pentagon (my opposition to a general still stands), he was an advocate of a larger stay-behind force in Iraq than the Obama White House team wanted. Austin is not the guy to choose if you want to turn the military upside down.
Biden has avoided innovators who might renovate departments in favor of institutionalists who want to restore departments and agencies to their original mission (e.g., Denis McDonough at Veterans Affairs, Tom Vilsack at the Agriculture Department). If anything — and I find their patience remarkable — super-progressives can point to few staffing wins.
Another silly Republican scare tactic — Democrats will pack the court! — likewise has lost credibility, especially coming from a party that rushed through a last-minute confirmation of a right-wing Supreme Court justice. In any event, the most Biden seems inclined to do is set up a commission to study court reform generically. Not the stuff of radical court-packers.
On policy, Biden’s options are limited by the closely divided Senate (even if Democrats do not win both Georgia runoffs) and by the national health-care and economic emergencies. His top agenda items — expedited vaccinations and putting together a stimulus deal — are items Republicans have championed through the Cares Act, despite their latest mind-numbing obstruction to a pre-inauguration bill. “Build Back Better” is a slogan aimed at making capitalism fairer, not knocking it down. Biden continues to resist many progressive measures, including student loan forgiveness.
Republicans who voted against President Trump, not necessarily because they favored or even knew much about Biden’s agenda, might be pleasantly surprised to find out that Biden Democrats look a lot like what used to be called Rockefeller Republicans. Given that the Republican Party has descended into authoritarian lunacy, these refugees from the Trump GOP might find themselves voting Democratic by default for a while. They will not agree with the administration on some issues, but they might be surprised by how little strikes them as excessively progressive, let alone socialist.
Once more, Never Trump and ex-Republicans might realize they had been sold a bill of goods by Republican fear-merchants. If Biden holds the line against the most progressive elements in his party, ex-Republicans might find themselves surprisingly comfortable in a Biden Democratic Party.
 
"B-but he's a socialist proxy!"
image0-16-1.png
 
Why's it bad that Biden is NOT a socialist? Pretty sure it's a good thing.

Also "the Republican Party has descended into authoritarian lunacy" (from the article), have you niggas ever looked in the mirror or nah?
 
Biden is a socialist in the same way Trump is worse than Hitler.
In the same way Trump is the Neo-Nazi, white nationalist ticket, Biden was the socialist ticket.
 
I have to say as much as I'm not sold on Biden as a candidate I am enjoying the salt from Communist retards that finally realized Biden used them for votes and will now throw them away like trash in favor of corporate tax cuts and middle eastern wars.
 
Another silly Republican scare tactic — Democrats will pack the court! — likewise has lost credibility, especially coming from a party that rushed through a last-minute confirmation of a right-wing Supreme Court justice. In any event, the most Biden seems inclined to do is set up a commission to study court reform generically. Not the stuff of radical court-packers.

Yeah, kinda hard to blame that one on Republicans when many left-leaning rags were selling stories like "BIDEN NEEDS TO PACK THE COURTS OR TRUMP'S SUPREME KKKOURT WILL BAN ABORTION!!!!!!"
 
I have to say as much as I'm not sold on Biden as a candidate I am enjoying the salt from Communist retards that finally realized Biden used them for votes and will now throw them away like trash in favor of corporate tax cuts and middle eastern wars.
That's what happens when you have 'big tent' left-wing parties. They're all enslaved by the notion of there only being one 'true' party for the left, they won't think about peeling away to form their own parties like The Greens parties in other western nations. It's a self-defeating mentality that ultimately sorta pushes casual observers towards the centre.
 
But he's a GLOBALIST!
Which is worse. Globofags deserve the bullet just as much or more than commie/nazis. At least the latter can admit to their ideals and intent. Globofags pretend.

Still, it's funny seeing Antifag/BLM types realize they just got played, again.
Funnier still when they act shocked their cries for radical measures like police defunding got ignored.
 
Yeah, kinda hard to blame that one on Republicans when many left-leaning rags were selling stories like "BIDEN NEEDS TO PACK THE COURTS OR TRUMP'S SUPREME KKKOURT WILL BAN ABORTION!!!!!!"
It didn't really help that Biden himself refused to ever answer the question pertaining to what he intended to do with the Supreme Court, and whether or not he intended to pack it. It wasn't that he pussy-footed around it either, he literally refused to answer it because his "position would become a talking point" or whatever the Hell way he phrased it.
 
It didn't really help that Biden himself refused to ever answer the question pertaining to what he intended to do with the Supreme Court, and whether or not he intended to pack it.
Instead of "packing the courts," they need to pack their bags to a home or something.
 
Just like Trump, Biden is authoritarian right, now that the establishment got rid of the rock in the shoes that was Trump they will throw the left wing retards under the bus, and they will very slowly reaslise this throughout 2021.

Enjoy your corrupt president, at least he's not orange I guess.
 
Why's it bad that Biden is NOT a socialist? Pretty sure it's a good thing.
This kind of hit piece is designed to convert those who despise socialism to accepting a Biden presidency because he's not really a socialist. Now that all the socialists who voted for him have done their jobs, the consent machine can get to work pumping up Biden as a "moderate" whose presidency you can sleep through as corporate tyranny slowly descends upon us all. Always view these kind of opinion pieces as being mostly performative rather than substantive.

Also "the Republican Party has descended into authoritarian lunacy" (from the article), have you niggas ever looked in the mirror or nah?
This is an example of leftists either having terrible memories or being wilfully misleading: the uper-middle class, educated Democrat voters have all believed the republicans to be authoritarian fascists way before Trump came along. Remember the "War on Christmas"? Glenn Beck? The Tea Party? Creationism in classrooms? The 2013 (i think) shutdown? All that fed into the narrative of Republicans as one-party gun-toting backwater useful idiot religious zealots who support White-Christian fascism and continue to vote for corporate welfare while slashing regulations. This attitude is really a holdover from the Obama era impressions of republicans that they've successfully transferred to Trump, even though it doesn't work nearly as well. (Although it apparently worked well enough to cost Trump the presidency.)
 
If only he had a forty-seven year track record voters could have reviewed or outlets, like WaPo, could have reported on!

But hey ORANGE MAN LOST UWU LOL OWOOOOOO!!! Now it is our turn!

Idiots.
 
It didn't really help that Biden himself refused to ever answer the question pertaining to what he intended to do with the Supreme Court, and whether or not he intended to pack it. It wasn't that he pussy-footed around it either, he literally refused to answer it because his "position would become a talking point" or whatever the Hell way he phrased it.
Can't have your positions used against you if you don't have any positions.

By the same token, you can't be criticized for not keeping your promises if you don't make promises to begin with.
 
I don't know if it's always been this bad, or 2020 has exasperated it, but I'm still shocked whenever an article basically says "if Biden didn't literally say it, then you aren't allowed to accuse him of it." Just the outright semantics wars that are used by "fact-checkers" and "debunkers". Like politicans of all people would never try to spin a story or hide their true intentions, on any side.
 
Back
Top Bottom