UN Slate workers to strike over diversity

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/420771-newly-unionized-slate-staff-votes-to-strike

Recently unionized writers and editors at Slate have reportedly voted almost unanimously to strike over concerns about the company's diversity policies and a rule mandating that union fees be optional for Slate employees.

Bloomberg News reports that Slate employees voted 52 to 1 in favor of a strike and have begun considering when workers will walk out. A spokesman for the union told Bloomberg that the rules mandating optional union fees at the left-leaning blog seemed to be a "betrayal" of the site's values.

“We just feel that it’s a total and absolute betrayal of Slate’s most fundamental values,” Slate writer Mark Joseph Stern told Bloomberg.

A request for comment from Slate was not immediately returned. Representatives for Slates's union released a chain of messages on Twitter Tuesday morning following the vote, further accusing Slate management of trying to "degrade the legitimacy" of Slate's union.

"We’ve been bargaining our contract for 8 months. We’re excited by a lot of what we’ve achieved at the table. But we’re still dismayed by management’s position on certain key issues," the union tweeted.

"Most crucially, our unit continues to be outraged by management’s inclusion of a right-to-work clause, a technique designed to degrade the legitimacy of our union," the account continued. "We love Slate. We want make the strongest, best Slate possible. But Slate is its workers—it’s the writers, editors, producers, and staffers who make the magazine."

The Writers Guild of America, East, which represents Slate's union, told The Hill in a statement that Slate staffers were fighting for a "reasonable" contract with management.

“The WGAE-represented employees at Slate have made two things clear to management: they want a reasonable contract that addresses their needs and respects their decision to unionize, and they're willing to fight for it. The Writers Guild of America, East and its thousands of members stand with the Slate employees, and we know that solidarity works," the group's executive director, Lowell Peterson, said.

Bloomberg reports that Slate workers had previously employed other in-office forms of protest before resorting to Tuesday's vote, including at least one hourlong "Slack strike" where employees would sign off or refuse to answer messages on the office communication platform.

TL;DR Slate workers mad over diversity policies within the company, and the Writers' Guild approves of the strike.
 
Honestly if I owned Slate I'd just fire them all and hire some leftie bloggers and a few fresh off the boat pajeets and pay them a third of the wage. I doubt anyone would notice a difference.
 
Politicizing your workforce is the first step to workers being more concerned with insider political maneuvering and contract stipulations than doing their jobs....
I can certainly attest to that. Out of 300 people in the unit I'm in only about 30 care about anything more than how much they'll get from the next MOA and why the president seems to hang around the administration so much while telling them to calm down. I couldn't give less of a fuck what happens to it but it's just depressing to hear all day.

Admittedly I've heard some good stories about the administration trying to fire or reprimand people for fucked up reasons and the union helped, in the past, but I've yet to see them do shit besides screw potential new members out of money myself. If this ruling came out a few years earlier I'd have never bothered with the racket.
 
They should just automate their site with a chatbot.

This TRANS POC on INSTAGRAM just dunked on ALEX JONES using GIFS FROM DISNEY'S FROZEN. Here's why THAT'S POWERFUL
by: Robostein 6000000
 
They are doing this the week after competitor Mic fired everybody and sold the brand and IP to a VC. Wow! The complete and utter lack of self awareness and self preservation is... well okay it's bog standard for modern "journalists". But damn! They are saving Slate the trouble of firing their asses before they sell the brand wholesale to somebody that doesn't want the messy employees. In their Unionization classes they somehow missed a crucial element of the whole relationships. The employees must in fact provide something of value in order to have any leverage over the employer. This pack of troons and Pedo appologists at Slate sure as hell does not do that. They could all be replaced with a crude AI for better results and less grief.
 
Did I miss it or did the article not talk about the diversity part at all?

I was wondering about this. It's mentioned as a reason for their strike, but the actual information doesn't talk about how that's affected their actions at all, and instead focusses on the more standard union fare of not wanting to be fired for just any reason.

But then, it's also a Slate strike, so insert the 'The Critic' clip of 'And nothing of value was lost' right about here.
 
Or, you're forced to pay the fee and therefore be a member of the union.

Depending on where the office is located, that might not be legal. If Slate wants to play hard ball, they’ll relocate to a right-to-work state where it is illegal for union membership to be a requirement of employment.
 
They are doing this the week after competitor Mic fired everybody and sold the brand and IP to a VC. Wow! The complete and utter lack of self awareness and self preservation is... well okay it's bog standard for modern "journalists". But damn! They are saving Slate the trouble of firing their asses before they sell the brand wholesale to somebody that doesn't want the messy employees. In their Unionization classes they somehow missed a crucial element of the whole relationships. The employees must in fact provide something of value in order to have any leverage over the employer. This pack of troons and Pedo appologists at Slate sure as hell does not do that. They could all be replaced with a crude AI for better results and less grief.

I'd also like to remind everyone that Gothamist, another digital publication, was shut down last year after it voted to unionize. Slate generates minimal revenue and is owned by a diversified multi-billion dollar investment firm, so a similar closure due to union matters is absolutely not out of the question.
 
Slate thought it would be a good idea to publish an article defending that super creepy pedo puppeteer a few years back so I don't feel sorry for them.
 
Depending on where the office is located, that might not be legal. If Slate wants to play hard ball, they’ll relocate to a right-to-work state where it is illegal for union membership to be a requirement of employment.
So Austin Texas where they can get those sweet sweet tax breaks.
 
So, if I understand this correctly, what the staff are complaining about is that Slate management have refused their union demand that everyone who works for Slate has to pay into the union, even if they're not a member of the union? Is that correct? And on top of that, the (mostly) white staff are complaining that there are too many white people working for Slate?
 
The first time I heard of Slate was when their critic gave the first season of Game of Thrones a bad review after admittedly not watching it, then got all huffy when people said he maybe should’ve watched it before reviewing it.

Also Slate is, according to them, “too fucking white” which isn’t racist at all.
 
The first time I heard of Slate was when their critic gave the first season of Game of Thrones a bad review after admittedly not watching it, then got all huffy when people said he maybe should’ve watched it before reviewing it.

Unfortunately not an isolated phenomenon in reviews these days. So many "think pieces" about how a film/game is problematic presented as a review without actually having experienced the film/game. Or even better the infamous polygon rock star review where they lament that their job is reviewing the game rather than actually reviewing the game.
 
Back
Top Bottom