Shy Hard 2: Shy Harder

[Trombonista]

What about France is pissing off unlovablenerd?

 

[cypocryphy]

What about France is pissing off unlovablenerd?

It has women in it.

Rape is illegal there.

Things like that I bet.

 

[The Hunter]

What about France is pissing off unlovablenerd?

It has women in it.

Rape is illegal there.

Things like that I bet.

You forgot the part about how they see homosexuals as human beings with organs and cognitive thinking abilities as opposed to being filled with dark magic and poo-poo.

 

[Saney]

What about France is pissing off unlovablenerd?

Apparently it's illegal to get paternity tests taken.

So why do women despise me?

I have done nothing to any woman. I have ALWAYS treated them with respect.

So why don't I get some back?

...

I'll leave you with this thought;

One day, a loveshy man will not be content with gunning down a few women.

One day, a man will take A THOUSAND of you bitches with him.

Then, maybe the world will sit up and take notice.

And you have to ask why women despise you?

Considering the hell men have to go through in the feminised world today where everything is skewed to favour women in all areas of life, but especially in the dating scene, then the new system would have to be one which would quickly and swiftly reverse the damage done to our societies by the incessant terrorism of men by feminism and it's policies propped p by governments and institutions. So I'd propose of system of male choice in the dating game. All I'd recommend is one law and one law only with regards to male-female relationships. No matter what a man says to or asks of a woman, a woman cannot say no. A no from a woman could be reported as easily to the Police as a current day rape, and would also be punishable by a jail sentence.

Call me a misogynist, or call me angry from perceived mistreatment of ordinary men under the hammer of feminism, but it's the only way for society to make up for years of torment and give ordinary men not only the chance to date a woman without the fear of ever hearing a no, but also the chance to date out of their league and the chance to produce better-looking offspring.

A woman saying no to a man under the new system could be classed as equivalent to raping the man. You may think this is misoginist and harsh, but wake up guys, ugly men are going to prison daily in feminised countries for even looking at women, when the women will claim is that she was raped, only in actual fact to only be looked at by the wrong type of guy for her in the wrong way.

The only system that would work is one where the dating minefield would be pushed to the female side of the battleground.

Someone has entitlement issues.

I have often thought of this; and at this point i no longer have any qualms about doing it, except for the legal consequences, assault, and battery, possibly agrivated felony assualt. If there were some way to to that with out geting in trouble and being labled a woman beater i would more than gladly physically hurt any woman who hurt me emotionally or rejected me in a mean way. Becoming a serial killer is better, if you do it right, youll have time to flee the country, and then leave a note saying why you killed all the bitches as you leave to a non extradition nation.Women need to learn that being crul to men will have physical consequences.

Oh, joy, another potentially dangerous loveshy. Because not having sex eith one of these guys warrants murder.

Do you have any RELEVANT prove that all women arent part of an evil hive mind? They are out to get men because they know men need sex, and they go out tease guys and withhold sex. They reject them in cruel ways, and are very
egocentric and sociopathic if you look at the way modern bitches act. It doesnt matter if women in general dont fit those descriptors; all that matters is the individuals experiences; have enough bad ones, and they represent REALITY....

Oh and FYI killing women, and making a political statemnt can be very effective, its something called terrorism, and it has brought major nations to their knees. Kill enough women, make it clear why, and then maybe then society will take you seriously. Im not saying i would do that; i have no desire to go to prison, but i would enthusiastically root for a person or group that would. Sometimes when one is hopeless, HATE is the only thing left going for a person; thats the way it is for me; ive replaced my desire to get a woman, which i know will never happen, with hatred...its not a bad substitute let me tell you that.

 

[Rio]

Why do loveshies all hate feminism so much anyway? Is it really so awful to them that women want social equality? Do they really want women to be property? Because it sure looks like it. Or is it just a scapegoat they don't understand that they can blame for their lack of sexlives?

 

[spaps]

Do you have any RELEVANT prove that all women arent part of an evil hive mind? They are out to get men because they know men need sex, and they go out tease guys and withhold sex. They reject them in cruel ways, and are very
egocentric and sociopathic if you look at the way modern bitches act. It doesnt matter if women in general dont fit those descriptors; all that matters is the individuals experiences; have enough bad ones, and they represent REALITY....

Oh and FYI killing women, and making a political statemnt can be very effective, its something called terrorism, and it has brought major nations to their knees. Kill enough women, make it clear why, and then maybe then society will take you seriously. Im not saying i would do that; i have no desire to go to prison, but i would enthusiastically root for a person or group that would. Sometimes when one is hopeless, HATE is the only thing left going for a person; thats the way it is for me; ive replaced my desire to get a woman, which i know will never happen, with hatred...its not a bad substitute let me tell you that.

 

[Saney]

Why do loveshies all hate feminism so much anyway? Is it really so awful to them that women want social equality? Do they really want women to be property? Because it sure looks like it. Or is it just a scapegoat they don't understand that they can blame for their lack of sexlives?

They seem to have it in their heads that feminism's end goal is enslaving men. Where they got that idea, I have no clue.

So the raped person can never be responsible for the rape? They can never be at fault it seems. No matter how much they seem to desire being truly dominated and no matter how much they 'let it happen', they are never the one to blame? You can never say she was 'asking for it'. . . but to be raped, that's the gift of ulitmate control, complete dominance and complete submission.

"Ultimate control"? Wut.

And what is that difference? Interestingly I'm actually discussing rape with another new poster as well. . . since the difference between rape and domination is 'consent', what gives consent? Attraction, just with animals and their mating rituals of sexual display - if you are attractive, good sperm, then it's not rape.

Who else wants to bet that he's on some kind of Government watchlist?

really sad that womyn got to be this way, it was better a few decades ago... at this point I honestly think a husband needs to be legally allowed to hit his wife once in a while when she misbehaves, it's hard coded in womyn's DNA that a strong man worthy of respect will hit her and severely scold her whenever she tries messing with him, in the end they love their husband a lot more for it... they subconsciously want to be hit and be told to shut up... sad that feminists have screwed this up because it only means that womyn will do all kind of nasty shit that will go completely unchecked and they think they're entitled to it

this is what happens in every third world country, and marriages are really stable there, because the man is the true chief of the family and he is allowed to be a man... this is the un-politically correct truth

I don't t think he understands how DNA works.

That said I would also like to clarify a few things. Yes, I did encourage Alexius to go buy a
gun and kill his crush. Yes, in fact I do admire Cho, The Columbine Duo, George Sodini and any
other individual who has found the courage to do what they did and both deliver a warning to
society and at the same time challenge our collective morality. I will neither retract,
apologize or somehow make my opinion more palatable. I have stood by my comments and I will
continue to do so. If you have a problem with that somehow ruining the forums for you, then
tough shit. I'm the owner and I say what I want whereas at a moments notice I can restrict
your right to do the same.

Ok, this guy definetly jerks off to guro.

Women are fucking worthless cunts. Almost everything that was invented was invented by MEN... even fucking tampons!!! Man you women are so fucking worthless. Women are so stupid many companies have had to completely discard advancement tests because NO women would otherwise qualify. Fuck you all, I hate each and every

This one too.

"Untill i took courses in womens studies, i had never though about things like women being paid less than men for the same jobs, or women being objectified by the media, or how the word guys excludes women. The readings and discussion in classes helped me see these things and start to challenge a lot of ways women are seen and treated"

Fucking kill me know if this is the type of woman thats left to date. If this is the case id rather go gay. Stuff like this makes me want to kill all women and replace them with female type androids complete with realistic vaginas; then we wont have to worry about women turning men into second class citizens as revenge for all the years of percieved "oppression" which is what feminism is; revenge.

Relax, something tells me you won't be dating anyone.

Women are not free thinkers.
Women are not creative.
Women do not innovate.

QUICK! (without looking something up) Name 3 famous female inventors.

Too hard? name ONE.

Give up? Yeah,....thats what I fuckin thought.

I...fucking seriously? Stephanie Kwolek. Maria Beasely. Mary Anderson. What have you done, jackass?

 

[The Hunter]

Moving this topic now that the lolcow forum is back.

 

[Saney]

Observing women over the past three decades (or a bit less to account for early childhood), I have come to the conclusion that the fundamental problem in male-female relations is that women ultimately are not capable of experiencing love. There are of course some exceptions to the rule, given how diverse is the array of possible human personalities, but the general premise still holds. Ever since puberty, the idea of love in the minds of men is associated with particular women that they meet in the course of their life, whereas women do keep dreaming about some ideal "prince charming", but seldom allow that fantasy to coincide with reality. Teenage boys pine after girls who are their classmates or neighbors and they attach utmost importance to those feelings. Girls of the same age may indulge in dating, but ironically, contrary to the perception of being the emotional gender, they harbor far less desire for serious attachment. They are holding out for a better deal.

At some point, of course, women do enter serious relationships, but it's enough to look at the choices they make to question the idea whether any love is involved. The main reason why domestic violence is even an issue in the world is that women notoriously associate themselves with men who are known to everyone as being prone to abusive behavior. Serial killers on death row routinely get marriage proposals from otherwise sane women and there was a recent case where a retarded death row inmate fathered a child of a female guard. From common observation, it is fairly obvious that women respond to men who impress them with some measure of strength, be it physical or social. The latter is mostly status based - determined by how much a man influences his surroundings. This leads me to the conclusion that what a woman really experiences towards a man is awe and fear rather than love. The first two emotions, combined together, can actually resemble the third, which is to some extent the source of the prevailing myth. The proof of this hypothesis can be observed in every day life. Ever since the economic crisis has hit the US at the end of 2007, there have been thousands of such cases. The number of marriages has declined over the past five years while the number of divorces has increased. It is also important to note that the great majority of divorces, something along the line of 85%, were initiated by women.

Whenever a man loses his footing in life, for example through job loss, decreased business revenue, or other factors, the chance that his female partner will abandon him rises dramatically. A woman who stops being awed by her man quickly becomes disenchanted and argumentative. Suddenly the man cannot do anything right, and often goes to great lengths to please before responding in kind out of sheer frustration. This is a prelude to a split that became inevitable as soon as the woman ceased to operate in submission mode. Notice that the man did not necessarily become a different person as a result of trying circumstances. It might have happened, but I would venture to guess that it's rather rare. The problem lies in female perception of men and their inability to really love. Women do not attach themselves to men who are corporeal and fallible human beings. They are instead irresistibly drawn by the ideas of power and influence. These things can be wielded by a particular man, but at the same time they can be transferred to another person along with a woman's attachment.

From the thread, "Are women capable of love?" Yeah, they really need to debate about this.

 

[Trombonista]

Damn, SociallyInept is pissed about being reminded about the realities of gender inequality. Maybe it's because it contradicts his victim complex.

 

[KatsuKitty]

Mesian's name used to be "picky picky picky", probably a shot at how most women aren't slutty. I just find this amusing.

If anything, I'd love if males were half as "picky" as women are, because then 20% of gay men wouldn't have HIV (according to the CDC) and my community would be rid of a certain plague.

 

[Bugaboo]

Dude's right that women didn't invent tampons but another guy did so his wife could play tennis while she had her period which was nice of him

 

[The Hunter]

Mesian's name used to be "picky picky picky", probably a shot at how most women aren't slutty. I just find this amusing.

If anything, I'd love if males were half as "picky" as women are, because then 20% of gay men wouldn't have HIV (according to the CDC) and my community would be rid of a certain plague.

I'm one of the pickiest people I know. I'm much pickier with men than women (and I'm pretty picky with girls), but if I meet a guy I like, chances are my pants will constantly be at my ankles.

 

[KatsuKitty]

Mesian's name used to be "picky picky picky", probably a shot at how most women aren't slutty. I just find this amusing.

If anything, I'd love if males were half as "picky" as women are, because then 20% of gay men wouldn't have HIV (according to the CDC) and my community would be rid of a certain plague.

I'm one of the pickiest people I know. I'm much pickier with men than women (and I'm pretty picky with girls), but if I meet a guy I like, chances are my pants will constantly be at my ankles.

Oh, you're enough of a dream. ♥

 

[Saney]

^now i know somebody will surely accuse me of that for even bringing the subject up... but anyways my main question is why are people always soo suprised/shocked by it? i lived on a farm when i was growing up and i learned that rape is just a part of life in the animal kingdom.... i saw:dogs force themselves on other dogs, horse on horse, bull on horse, and donkey on horse... heck dogs even force themselves on humans, ever had your leg humped?so basically theres a pattern across just about every species where the female chooses a mate (just like humans) and rejects the others, the rejected ones end up forcing themselves on females to get theirs. so the point i'm trying to make is males across species are largely driven by sexual desire and act accordingly, its as true for humans as it is for dogs and monkies. males of all species feel an impulsive need to mate/procreate, even if they have to force themselves on females to get it.. so why does society deny all of this and shame mens sexual desires, telling us we dont need sex? why do they do that and then act horrified and suprised when it happens? i mean dont get me wrong, i dont like the idea of rape at all, but is it really a suprise? we(humans) are capable of logical thought so we are held to a higher standard and we should be... but that doesnt change the fact that we still have the same instincts as monkeys.. and those animal impulses are very powerful... most men are able to keep them in check, but sometimes sexually frustrated men lose it and revert to those animal instincts.. thats my opinion anyways, what do you think?

Oh my God, he thinks a dog humping someone's leg qualifies as rape. Excuse me, I have to find a good facepalm pic.

 

[Bugaboo]

^now i know somebody will surely accuse me of that for even bringing the subject up... but anyways my main question is why are people always soo suprised/shocked by it? i lived on a farm when i was growing up and i learned that rape is just a part of life in the animal kingdom.... i saw:dogs force themselves on other dogs, horse on horse, bull on horse, and donkey on horse... heck dogs even force themselves on humans, ever had your leg humped?so basically theres a pattern across just about every species where the female chooses a mate (just like humans) and rejects the others, the rejected ones end up forcing themselves on females to get theirs. so the point i'm trying to make is males across species are largely driven by sexual desire and act accordingly, its as true for humans as it is for dogs and monkies. males of all species feel an impulsive need to mate/procreate, even if they have to force themselves on females to get it.. so why does society deny all of this and shame mens sexual desires, telling us we dont need sex? why do they do that and then act horrified and suprised when it happens? i mean dont get me wrong, i dont like the idea of rape at all, but is it really a suprise? we(humans) are capable of logical thought so we are held to a higher standard and we should be... but that doesnt change the fact that we still have the same instincts as monkeys.. and those animal impulses are very powerful... most men are able to keep them in check, but sometimes sexually frustrated men lose it and revert to those animal instincts.. thats my opinion anyways, what do you think?

Oh my God, he thinks a dog humping someone's leg qualifies as rape. Excuse me, I have to find a good facepalm pic.

 

[The Hunter]

Mesian's name used to be "picky picky picky", probably a shot at how most women aren't slutty. I just find this amusing.

If anything, I'd love if males were half as "picky" as women are, because then 20% of gay men wouldn't have HIV (according to the CDC) and my community would be rid of a certain plague.

I'm one of the pickiest people I know. I'm much pickier with men than women (and I'm pretty picky with girls), but if I meet a guy I like, chances are my pants will constantly be at my ankles.

Oh, you're enough of a dream. ♥

Yeah, needless to say I'm a virgin because the guys here are, well, the exact opposite of my type, and I'd rather wait for a long long time before trying anything with a girl. Still not a desperate sack of shit like these guys, though.

 

[Trombonista]

Why do these guys think they need sex? They've lived most of their lives without it, so it's not like they'll die if the women in front of them at Starbucks don't jump on their dicks.

I'm a virgin too, but that's because I haven't been that interested in dating or sex (I'm thinking about giving dating a try this year, though). I get the desires for companionship, romance, and even sex, but there's more to life.

 

[Saney]

Perfect. Thanks!

I don't think rape is fun, i'm just saying if they hate it soo much why do they deny mens sexuality... and say "men dont need sex". its a real head scratcher to me when you have men being shamed and denied for being sexual and at the same time having more temptation that ever before, but yet society acts suprised when a man loses it and ends up raping somebody...

Incoherent rage.

Because in feminist culture, women are gods and talk about rape is blaspheme. Women are backed by psychopathic omega thugs (bad-boys) who recognize rape as interfering with seduction. In contrast, consider Ancient Athens where seduction was considered a greater crime than rape (which I agree with):

...How does he even function in this day and age?

 

[KatsuKitty]

Why do these guys think they need sex? They've lived most of their lives without it, so it's not like they'll die if the women in front of them at Starbucks don't jump on their dicks.

I'm a virgin too, but that's because I haven't been that interested in dating or sex (I'm thinking about giving dating a try this year, though). I get the desires for companionship, romance, and even sex, but there's more to life.

I can't speak for them but I don't think they belive they need sex so much as they need to be "normal" like everyone else. I think it's more because everyone else is seemingly able to get it and they're not. It draws a hardline divide between who you think are normal people, and yourself. So in set "A" you have the class of people who've progressed normally in their sexual development, and in set "B" you have people who, for some reason or another, really struggle to get just a kiss. After a while, virginity becomes a veritable Berlin wall separating themselves from everyone else, and they feel trapped in East Germany with no way out. It's a rite of passage they never got to indulge in and have no way of seemingly obtaining.

At least that's what I feel like at times. Only for some reason, the love-shies tend to take it out on women with rage reserved for enemies of warfare. I don't get it. I don't even know how they make the connection that this is acceptable or just. It's like hating the man at the Ferrari store because he wasn't such a nice guy to give you a free sports car.