Opinion Should We Just Let It Burn?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2021/04/29/should-we-just-let-it-burn-n2588663 (Archive)

My town’s not getting burned down because the rich coastal liberals with “Hate Has No Home Here” signs on their exquisitely landscaped front yards will never put up with that nonsense here in Shangri-Lib. In a very real way, the chaos that the liberals are creating by handcuffing other people’s cops – do you think my cops will ever get the order to stand down? – is not my problem. And, unless you are still living in some Democrat hellhole, it’s probably not your problem either.

So, why again when some big blue city that hasn’t had a Republican mayor since phrenology was the pseudo-science of the day – as quackery goes, head bump interpretation is way less damaging than weather paranoia and flu panic – suffers self-induced ritualized convulsions upon the death of yet another felon should the rest of us care?

But we will care, at least for now, because we are nice people and we think all Americans should live in something like peace and prosperity. It’s hard to get through our heads that not all of our countrymen feel that way. The chaos, violence, and misery that some Americans exist in is actually their choice. It’s a choice that liberals make, and they can make that choice because blue city voters inexplicably elect liberals who choose chaos.

The libs tried giving people money. That failed. Astonishingly, handing people free cash does not magically make things better. Then they tried improving the economies in these places by importing a bunch of foreigners to take all the entry level jobs. Astonishingly, that did not work either. Their current experiment is to make the cities woker by not arresting criminals who make the cities unlivable and releasing the few who are in jail. And – you are not going to believe this – that has also made things worse.

So, even though we do want to help – for now, because eventually there will come a point where non-blue city dwellers just shrug and say, “You’re on your own” – it’s not really clear what we can do gently. About 29 years ago this week, a bunch of soldiers and I tried to make Los Angeles safe again for a few weeks when we deployed in the Rodney King riots. It was quite an interesting time for a suburban guy who never ventured into the tougher parts of South-Central to be rumbling through it with an M16A1 rifle and a basic load of ammo. I got an up-close look at the reality of liberal misrule, though it was largely obscured by flames.

The people of the inner city loved us. They did not dig the LAPD, but they loved the Guards' citizen-soldiers, particular because many of our troops – my unit was 3rd Battalion, 160th Infantry based in smoldering Inglewood, for people who know the geography – were from the affected neighborhoods. And they took no guff. Many carried their own weapons and (allegedly) engaged in firefights with gang members with their own pieces so they did not have to account for spent Army rounds. The official combat tally was low. A Salvadorean drug dealer got his head blown off trying to run down some guardsmen at a road block – legend has it that the investigation consisted of some LAPD detectives rolling up, asking what happened, saying “Oh, okay,” then driving away. Also, rumor has it that a fleeing rapist got free gender reassignment surgery with a 5.56mm round. At other times, so it has been said, the guardsmen just beat the crap out of gangsters, who learned not to screw with the Army guys.

The locals were not heartbroken at this, not at all. Of course, this was before cell phones and total camera coverage, but the people were pretty happy about the thugs being driven away for a while. One lady told me how happy she was that her kids could play in the park now that the drug dealers were gone thanks to us. She hugged me, and people fed our troops while on patrol.

Maybe this was not politically correct, but it was sure as hell morally correct.

So, there is an answer to the violence. It’s called law and order. In extreme cases, like riots, it consists of massive, overwhelming force. But that’s a choice too, and one our gutless elite is not willing to make. They’d rather let the body count rise. They could end the murder spike tomorrow by backing the cops and dumping the leftist-bought prosecutors for real DAs. They could shut down riots and gangs and drug houses by simply shutting them down.

But they won’t.

And their constituents are not ready to force them to, not until the violence gets intolerably bad (and the liberals can tolerate a lot), or until the thugs push their luck by pushing into the suburbs and scaring the Trader Joe’s chardonnay mommy set.

Then it’s on like Donkey Kong, folks. To them, dead people in the ghetto are a statistic. Crime in the rich suburbs? That’s a crisis.

It’s all fun and games until it affects the white libs calling the shots. Word was that, during the riots, Beverly Hills – a liberal bastion – had its PD just shut the city off from people of color for a few days. If you had melanin, you weren’t getting in. And don’t hold your breath waiting for the BHPD to be defunded even today.

So, the question is not whether we normal people should just let the cities burn. In fact, we have no say in it unless we mobilize and invade. That’s not happening anytime soon. No, the question is whether the liberal establishment will tolerate this crap, and the answer is that it will until it gets scared. But then, all bets are off.
 
I can see why you are so fatalistic. All of the right wing politicians, pundits, and writers do nothing but whine, whine, and whine. I have yet to see any of them coming up with a conservative alternative in dealing with the problem we are in.
That's because they don't actually want to fix any of this. They benefit just as much as the leftists do when this stuff happens, because they can make some half assed call to arms and then never act on it, and stupid people will keep voting them in because they have an R instead of a D.

Our entire government is a uniparty, and the republicans are just controlled opposition who are willing to roll over for the democrats once they have enough votes to continue to secure their spot in government.

Pussies.
 
That's because they don't actually want to fix any of this. They benefit just as much as the leftists do when this stuff happens, because they can make some half assed call to arms and then never act on it, and stupid people will keep voting them in because they have an R instead of a D.

Our entire government is a uniparty, and the republicans are just controlled opposition who are willing to roll over for the democrats once they have enough votes to continue to secure their spot in government.

Pussies.
I know I come off pro collapse but Im not. I dont want thing to collapse but I want things broken up enough where people start behaving and thinking differently.

The only way that will happen is if America becomes a land of many regional powers instead of a single unified power.
 
CF0F24CB-5E82-4263-BEB1-8C0230103F74.jpeg

(Same vibes anyone?)
 
Times like these will lead to radicalization.
Especially as we see hard lefties getting away with murder (literally) or shrugging away our own laws as inconsequential.

Ultimately, local organization is the main step needed. Keep you and yours safe.
 
The libtard/Femminazi Jihad energy has reached momentum that cannot be stopped at this point. It will burn down weather we stand by with fire hoses or not.
 
I would prefer that our cities not burn. They're ours, no matter who occupies or governs them now. New York City belongs to Americans. Chicago belongs to Americans. Los Angeles belongs to Americans. These cities are our birthright just as much as our forests and our plains. Besides, fire spreads. If the cities burn, who knows what else will catch fire?

But no one in the cities cares about my preferences, so they'll burn themselves down and call it progress. Maybe it is. When a part of your body becomes diseased, sometimes the only solution is to cut it off.
They're the wrong kind of American.
 
United States was the land of many regional decentralized powers until the American Civil War ended. Unified only in as far as foreign relations and currency are concerned.
People really don’t seem to get how big of a fuck up centralization was. American conservatives can really work themselves up watching the European Union turn into more of a single state while shilling for the Cuckstitution.
 
The US at that time was also balls-to-the-wall isolationist as opposed to being the world's police force.
Knowing from experience with the Great Powers the U.S. Govt and more importantly the People had very good reasons to stay politically isolationist to the Old World for a long time. Economically that was a different story and Japan for one is still butthurt over it.
 
Times like these will lead to radicalization.
Especially as we see hard lefties getting away with murder (literally) or shrugging away our own laws as inconsequential.

Ultimately, local organization is the main step needed. Keep you and yours safe.
Yeah the left and democrats can be big and open. Everyone else cant.

My prediction non woke is going to evolve into small groups and clans. Such as family based, small towns, small crime families, secret societies (acting as covert cells) or fraternities.

The winning strat for woke and plutocrats is keep everything intact.

For everyone else their winning strat is going be fragmentation. If all 3 000 and some counties in america became sovereign nations then that would be the eviroment that would favor anti woke.


Even if one town or county manages to go its own way and maintains its sovereignty (like sea land did) then thats a win.
 
Last edited:

Speaking of letting it burn.
Theres going be a gas shortage this summer.

Oh the fuckery we re going to experience
I just want to point out that the "special training" to get a tanker endorsement on your Class A license is literally a five minute multiple choice test.

Study the actual exact test and you, too, can be an oil hauler.
 
On the one hand, this author is hilarious and I want to buy him a drink and listen to war stories.

On the other hand, no. Just because people live in areas where they elect idiots that make everything worse, that does not mean that those people have somehow lost their right to personal property. That is a God-given right to every American and they have that right regardless of whether elected officials are willing to defend it. They shouldn't have to move to have their stores and homes protected from vandalism and arson. That is what "equal protection under the law" should mean.
Ideally that's what it should be, but morality and justice can only exist in an ideal world where people choose to uphold them. I don't blame innocent people who happen to be caught in the crossfire and have their property destroyed. But if after this event they chose to do nothing about it, it's hard to feel sorry for them. Similar to a man who falls off a ladder, but then sets the same ladder back up only to fall again.

In an ideal world I should be able to leave valuables in my car and not have the glass broken when I get back. Similarly people should have the right to not have their stuff broken. However that is not the reality we live in. Sometimes you have to have a sense of foresight and understanding of causality in order to survive.
 
Back
Top Bottom