Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Nothing you just said is actually correct. Appeals courts are not going to be looking at how people paid shit. They give no cares about a GFM or about insurance. They look at the current ruling and if it was right, and decide on it.
Appeals go over every aspect of the case, including the fees and sanctions hearing. Why do you think they went into Lemoine's hearing on Slatosch's affidavit and had brought up the notice of appeal and whether it was timely for them to have filed it when they did? Because the fee's and sanctions are determined in the appeal process as well.

Lemme put it in smaller words, don't talk about shit you know nothing about, and you won't look like as much of a dumbass as you've already made yourself out to be.
 
don't talk about shit you know nothing about


How you all didn't learn this lesson before Vic's massive loss, and now continue to double down on a long shot appeal baffles me.

Shane trying to flex is equal to Manjaw trying to flex.

He's more desperate for attention currently. Either that or he's continuously trying to bury the accusations against him made earlier.

Don't worry, we aren't gonna let anyone forget.

Wah cry harder incel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah and much like how all of Lawtwitter told everyone how this would go and you all wouldn't listen, they and more have told you how appeals will go. Mark this tweet down so we can come back to it in a year and do the they told you so's.

You asked what's the use of aruging over something "no one can change."

An appeals court is not "no one," retard. We're not even taking bets on what the ultimate outcome is. Only that you are a moron who has no concept of how these things work.

I was watching a good YouTube video, and got pinged on Discord about the fact you were back on here chimping out. I honestly forgot how stupid you are. It's not surprising you poor wife is the only ass you can get.

Now I'm going to go back to more intellectually stimulating things.

P.S. Tell your faggot friends on Lawtwitter I'm not Nick. It's sorta funny, but also sad how they tried so hard to wipe out the GFM with such innuendo, but fell short.
 
Last edited:
How you all didn't learn this lesson before Vic's massive loss, and now continue to double down on a long shot appeal baffles me.
The NoMoneyca also lost in $170k fees from the malpractice mosquito "TCPA Expert" but please keep whining appeals freeze all payment and fees till appeals is over.
 
How you all didn't learn this lesson before Vic's massive loss, and now continue to double down on a long shot appeal baffles me.
Great job cutting out what I was arguing, really shows how competent you are at making counter points by not addressing the argument. Must be why they replaced you with Greg.
 
Pulling out fraudulent loans from a bank isn't making money Shane.

I have never taken a loan from a bank. But I can ask Vic all about fraudulent things.

We just don't make stupid bets like you with no money, we make smart bets and keep money. But please keep missing all the actual argument being made and take some thing out of context to attempt a "gotcha"

So you think betting on Vic winning on appeals is a stupid bet. We agree.
 
Resorting to calling people incel just means he has nothing more to give. He's used up and irritated, probably much like his wife since he cares more about dunking on Vic and the "incels" than he does about his own responsibilities.

Pack it up guys, party's over. The boomer needs to go to bed before his blood pressure rises any more.
 
Back
Top Bottom