- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
17 or 18 when they passed each other in the staircase. Allegedly. Supposedly.
"17, 18, maybe when she was a toddler, neither of us remember, fuck it, who cares?"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
17 or 18 when they passed each other in the staircase. Allegedly. Supposedly.
View attachment 1004723
17 or 18 when they passed each other in the staircase. Allegedly. Supposedly.
"17, 18, maybe when she was a toddler, neither of us remember, fuck it, who cares?"
If I had to hazard a guess I'd say he's probably feeling emboldened by the fact that Chupp just ruled that there's no such thing as actionable defamation in Texas, or something like that.What I am having a hard time with is why he's here reanimating that narrative and not expecting to be called to task for it.
It's also true that abused children make easy marks for other abusers. There's a comorbid sort of relationship that forms. The abuser is trying to act like the perfect gentleman... they have to frame what they're doing as something that's normal and not harmful (because otherwise, the harm that results from their actions would be their fault, and they can't accept that). The victim is charmed into not seeing through the act until it's too late. The act eventually slips and the true nature of the abuser comes out.
"Don't know how old the girl was...That mouth was 18, and a solid 10 though."
Shane really doesn't know how to lie well, which is funny.
I may be remembering incorrectly but I think even she said this was another dude. Don't know how believable that is but that's even more suspect because that implies there's a deeper problem if she's got serial daddy issues.
Means the grooming started when she was significantly younger.
i didnt know women could bald like that so young. Shes giving the yost twin competition in the biggest forehead jfc.Who can say, honestly. Although I do distinctively remember someone mentioning either on one of these threads or on Twitter that her dad was apparently a longtime friend of Shane's.
On another note, she also apparently went to A-Kon last year on June 10, even though Shane says he gave his resignation back in 2017 during his sperg session yesterday, after he made posts defaming A-Kon and after he had a potential libel suit ready to tear him a new one. So that's weird.
View attachment 1005139
View attachment 1005145
Could just be grasping at straws but who knows.
Shane is just crucifying Vic by projecting his own actual guilty experiences with minors. If this doesn't prove it I dont know what does. He thinks by siding and virtue signaling with other fakes he'll wash his consciousness of his reality.
Wow. What world do you live in that winning is losing is so basic?He lost period. It doesn't matter why. Well it does. The fact is he lost because there was almost no chance of him ever winning. He is basically libel proof but too many people listened to Youtube instead of all the people who do this for a living.
Shane is 43 and she is now 22.
So now Shane is saying he has proof of Vic being a sexual predator. We're back to the early days of the lawsuit where Shane is desperate to get sued to feel important again, huh?
How many child brides will he sell to pay his court fees?
Some folks would prefer the dog.Just one, but she comes with a package deal including her kid and dog.
Tell me. You have actual data of the libel. Do you have actual data as to the reasons he was made to resign?What he was on about was that at the end of show, A-Kon gave an estimated half of the money. There has to be a completed accounting before the rest was given.
@Shane_Yes_That_One either was ignorant of this practice or chose to misrepresent it as A-Kon "skimming" the money; being butt hurt over having to tender a resignation. He posted that they had "scammed" people and all sorts of sundry lies on social media. It finally reached a point where he was going to be crushed in a libel suit. He pulled all of his stuff down but not before it was archived.
What I am having a hard time with is why he's here reanimating that narrative and not expecting to be called to task for it.
I'd wager she's smarter than he is.I guess Shame thinks he's not a sex pest because his "child bride" is a slow in the mind aka deveopmentally delayed, so she's not really human and it doesn't count.
That's a low bar buddy.I'd wager she's smarter than he is.