Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Army Burger said:
View attachment 761619

archive.fo

Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "Would suck if the con told them directly …

archived 17 May 2019 01:52:19 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

Would suck if that turned out to be complete bullshit, wouldn't it Shane?
Click to expand...
Also wouldn't matter as we have learnt from Meyer v Waid, Texas considers the contract valid until the moment one party breaches. Soye interfered before the breach occurred, he's done. Of course the idiot Shane thinks Waid's winning his suit too if I remember correctly.
 
Jub-Jub said:
Also wouldn't matter as we have learnt from Meyer v Waid, Texas considers the contract valid until the moment one party breaches. Soye interfered before the breach occurred, he's done. Of course the idiot Shane thinks Waid's winning his suit too if I remember correctly.
Click to expand...
Because Waid is on the "right" side
 
Army Burger said:
View attachment 761616
Click to expand...

Monica breaching her contract shows that threat to Kameha Con was real. And when these people did drop out, they did so with the intent to force Kameha Con to remove Vic. The wording on the e-mails from Daman Mills' agent and Sarah Wiedenheft makes that clear.

"as long as Vic Mignogna is attending Kameha Con, Daman will not."
"I will no longer be attending Kameha Con so long as Vic Mignogna is."

This wasn't an outright cancellation. They left the door open to come back, provided Kameha Con remove Vic.

761666


761667
 
Plank said:
An additional thought.

It seemed very strange some time ago when I heard Nick claim that KamehaCon was really upset with the two idiots Monica and Ron. I thought at first Nick was just bullshitting to some PR for Vic.

But it is clear now that KamehaCon is really pissed off that they were directly lied to by Ron Soye.
Click to expand...

In the texts you can see them asking Ron a couple of times whether he's sure about the information and the investigation.

Army Burger said:
View attachment 761690

archive.fo

Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "While stating that he was not her agent a…

archived 16 May 2019 22:54:35 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo
Click to expand...

You don't have to be employed as someone's agent to act as their agent. Stating that Monica would be reluctant to attend if Vic did and saying you'd try to get Monica to call is acting as a fucking agent.

But Shane knows all of this. He's just trolling for attention.
 
AnOminous said:
Shane knows nothing.
Click to expand...

The one thing I'd actually like to see Shane expand on is a comment made way back when where he said there were people in the industry who'd done "worse than Vic". The Bubba Fest guy also mentioned predators in the industry (something which is true of "entertainment" in general, no exceptions) and said people would be surprised at who they were.

Regardless of whether you're pro or anti Vic, wrong-doing by others has obviously been covered up for years and the whole kickvic thing is deflecting attention from that. If Shane were capable of being concise and to the point, I'd be interested in hearing more about the underbelly of the industry.
 
N1bbaN3rd said:
Shane is correct. What Nick showed is only a fraction of what is in the possession of The Beard. Based on how things have progressed so far, I'd wager that the full picture will indeed "blow the case apart" - entirely in Vic's favor.
Click to expand...

What Nick showed last night already blew the case apart for Ron. It's unmistakable proof of the Plaintiff's claim, in Ron's own words. Ron made a record of his actions. There is no real defense of it. Ron WILL face a Judgement at the end of this. No question. I know it would be utterly pointless, but part of me would love to see Shane put iunder oath and forced to defend some of his bullshit. Just for the entertainment value.
 
RodgerDodger said:
What Nick showed last night already blew the case apart for Ron. It's unmistakable proof of the Plaintiff's claim, in Ron's own words. Ron made a record of his actions. There is no real defense of it. Ron WILL face a Judgement at the end of this. No question. I know it would be utterly pointless, but part of me would love to see Shane put iunder oath and forced to defend some of his bullshit. Just for the entertainment value.
Click to expand...
Am I the only one reading the TI statue that even if what you say is true it still counts as TI?
 
repentance said:
Nope. That's correct. Vic can lose the defamation action and still win the tortious interference actions.
Click to expand...
Well that puts that State slogan "Don't mess with Texas" into a whole new perspective.
 
Urbanmech said:
Am I the only one reading the TI statue that even if what you say is true it still counts as TI?
Click to expand...

No, the Texas Supreme Court has also said exactly that.

Texas specifically examined the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772 notion of a "truthful information" affirmative defense to tortious interference and expressly rejected adopting it. Community Health Systems Professional Services Corp. et al. v. Hansen is the case. There's a defense of "justification" which includes some elements related to truthfulness but not a truthfulness defense as such, nor does it by itself constitute a defense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom