Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
RodgerDodger said:
Why would Shane assume that the con is telling him, or his master Soye the truth about anything. Those running the con clearly have a deep hateful resentment of those fuckweasels.
Click to expand...
He wants to seem like he knows what he's doing/talking about. Truth is, Shane is like an old boss I had: he had no control at home so he had to show everyone around him that he controls something.
 
Kosher Salt said:
Nick got them from Ty Beard.

Your move, MoRons.
Click to expand...

Let's not pretend that Shane wasn't ridiculed for saying as much just days ago. Think about how dumb Shane is and then consider those who didn't put an ounce of independent thought into where the screen shots of Chris Slatosch's phone came from. By the way, the texts and e-mails that were sent to Nick were collated in a document entitled, "discovery PDF_Redacted.pdf"

This material either came from Ty or Nick is pretending that it did to cover for Kamaha Con. Nick also recently revealed that the con contract he presented as an "example" was actually a Kameha Con contract. Where do we suppose that came from? He said he was asked by his source not to say that it was a Kameha Con contract.

766496


Fannyscum said:
Nick has said multiple times that he did not get the texts from Ty.
You have no idea what he does or does not have.
Please go back to your autistic flailing on twitter for our amusement.
Click to expand...

RodgerDodger said:
Nick has said he didn't get the texts from Ty. I'd bet dollars to donuts he did however run the texts past Ty for verification. "Does this match what you've got from your sources." Nick likes to have lots of verification.

I would be hilarious to see Nick subject his council of big brained lawyers to analyzing Shane's Legal Twitter arguments.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Jub-Jub said:
Why not call him a paedo, sexual harasser, sexual assaulter, molester or whatever else you've said for old times sake?
Click to expand...

But that's the thing, isn't it? @Shane_Yes_That_One has said repeatedly he doesn't think Vic is guilty of sexual assault, hasn't he, on Twitter? And yet he actively defends the people who have said he is, and also a pedophile, and other heinous crimes in the same vein, and regards saying that about Vic isn't defamation, but challenging the people who are saying that about Vic as defamation.

So if Vic isn't guilty of the crimes he's been accused of in his eyes, how does Shane justify defending the people who have made the accusations? If he believes Vic is maybe just a creeper, how does he justify not saying anything about the people who are ostensibly his friends calling Vic a rapist and a pedophile?

I mean, I know the answer. But I thought I'd at least throw another log on the cognitive dissonance pile.
 
GethN7 said:
So if someone has proof Vic is actually guilty, people are sick for wanting to see it, even if it's graphic yet proves Vic indeed deserves guilt.

My mind is blowing a fuse trying to understand how that makes sense.
Click to expand...
In their mind, we're all sexual deviant incels.
 
GethN7 said:
So if someone has proof Vic is actually guilty, people are sick for wanting to see it, even if it's graphic yet proves Vic indeed deserves guilt.

My mind is blowing a fuse trying to understand how that makes sense.
Click to expand...
ShaneLogic strikes again!
 
GethN7 said:
So if someone has proof Vic is actually guilty, people are sick for wanting to see it, even if it's graphic yet proves Vic indeed deserves guilt.

My mind is blowing a fuse trying to understand how that makes sense.
Click to expand...

Because he's a stupid attention whore who gets off on causing people to want to punch him in the groin repeatedly. It's really noticeable during the first stream he was on with Nick, where he gets absolutely torn to shreds, and yet keeps attempting the same pattern of attack, over and over again, even after Nick's already completely demolished his talking points. He has this absolute belief that he's in the right, reality be damned. It is this reality denial that is Shane's hallmark, and is what makes him so eminently mockable.

Unfortunately, it's not all good news, because this is also why Shane is fucking insufferable in his own thread.

He won't respond to anything that remotely challenges him, points out legitimate logic holes, or asks him to justify his own terrible behavior. If he does deign to respond on such things, it will be a terse, one-sentence response that explains nothing and insists that it's Shane and Shane alone who knows what's up. The reality is that he's a fucking coward who can't defend even the most basic of his positions and has subscribed to the tactic of "as long as I don't respond to anyone who calls me out on my shit, I can't be called a loser," disregarding the consequences.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom