UN Second Democratic Debates - Hopefully it will be better then last night?

Starts at 5pm-7:30pm PST / 7pm CST-9:30pm CST / 8pm-10:30pm EST
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/second-democratic-debates-night-2-big-night.59065/page-38 for 2nd night discussion
Welcome to day 2 of the second Democratic primary debates, tonight will feature:

Joe "No Blacks on the Bus" Biden former Vice President


Andrew Yang, he's asian


Cory Booker senator from New Jersey and mutated Obama clone


Julian Castro former housing and urban development secretary


Bill de Blasio mayor of the shithole known as New York City


Michael Bennet senator from Colorado


Tulsi Gabbard Hawaii representative and surf mommy


Kirsten Gillibrand senator from New York


Kamala Harris senator from California


Jay Inslee governor of Washington


Kiwi polling:

Spoiler

Night one

Night Two

How the polls are looking since last time(Biden comeback):

Spoiler

Emerson Polling

July National Poll: Biden Extends Support While Bernie Bounces Back

emersonpolling.reportablenews.com

QU Poll Release Detail

Biden Bounces Back As Harris Slumps Among U.S. Dems, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; 54 Percent Of All U.S. Voters Say Never Trump

poll.qu.edu

Results from last night:

Spoiler

Like last time the poll will be posted after the debates


If you want to watch the debate on your phone then you'll have to download CNN's dumb app, then enter http://smartlink.cnn.com/go into your browser and open in through the CNN app.
For PC users they just need to go here

 

[SmallTalk201]

View attachment 874463
And people wonder why they call her the Black Hilary Clinton

She looks like a bald version of Harry from Harry and the hendersons

 

[Stoneheart]

"polls" having them at 1%, claiming they are back by Russia and Russian bots.

this will break the DNC. Tulsi will have 3 or 4% in the raw numbers but Polls will use math to get her below the 2% mark.

 

[Adamska]

this will break the DNC. Tulsi will have 3 or 4% in the raw numbers but Polls will use math to get her below the 2% mark.

Given that Yang ranks higher than O'Rourke in more polls and yet didn't make the cut, I'd believe that.

I fully believe they're not even trying to be fair given it's only the third fucking debates that they're cutting the chaff. The first two spooked them when two of their frontrunners got owned and they tard panicked that their backers may not win.

 

[spiritofamermaid]

View attachment 874463
And people wonder why they call her the Black Hilary Clinton

Does this mean those records are lost forever? I'm assuming someone wasn't thinking this would happen and no one archived it (understandably).

 

[CheezzyMach]

this will break the DNC. Tulsi will have 3 or 4% in the raw numbers but Polls will use math to get her below the 2% mark.

First Trump destroyed the Neo-Cons and now Tulsi might destroy the NeoLibs.

Really hope she makes it and doesn't cuck out like Bernie.

 

[Your Weird Fetish]

Does this mean those records are lost forever? I'm assuming someone wasn't thinking this would happen and no one archived it (understandably).

It exists somewhere. You can't stop the signal.

First Trump destroyed the Neo-Cons and now Tulsi might destroy the NeoLibs.

Really hope she makes it and doesn't cuck out like Bernie.

I'd rather have Trump than her (unless she actually followed her word on Saudi Arabia) but I think a legit challenge from her could force him into more radical action in terms of his campaign promises so me too.

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

View attachment 874463
And people wonder why they call her the Black Hilary Clinton

You mean, it's not because she's married to a rapist and eats babies?!

 

[thismanlies]

First Trump destroyed the Neo-Cons and now Tulsi might destroy the NeoLibs.

Really hope she makes it and doesn't cuck out like Bernie.

Trump went against a party that didn't have super delegates voting in their primaries, wasn't holding their debates on Saturday nights, and didn't have the vast majority of the media coordinating campaign strategies with them to make a certain political candidate look good.

Tulsi's got an even tougher fight. Even if the DNC avoids the Saturday night shenanigans, they still have plenty of failsafes in place to ensure their donors get the candidate they want. That's not to say she can't beat them and win the nomination. But she'll need a lot of charisma to do so.

 

[SmallTalk201]

Here what I wanna see happen:
Pelosi getting so fed up with the extremists she decides to join the republicans after extensive back room dealing

 

[Cryonic Haunted Bullets]

To be honest, the democrats could shit and piss on the floor at the debates and they'd still probably win. Trump won pretty narrowly against a candidate as shitty as Hillary and now he's had an entire term for spite to build up against him.

 

[JambledUpWords]

To be honest, the democrats could shit and piss on the floor at the debates and they'd still probably win. Trump won pretty narrowly against a candidate as shitty as Hillary and now he's had an entire term for spite to build up against him.

I believe that the media over estimates their reach. People were certain that Hillary would win and despite the media working against Trump 24/7, he still won. Many of the Democratic candidates do not have any sort of idea of how to win the Rust Belt. The causes they are championing are those only living in big cities might care about. Even then, the policies for “green energy” and trade will only weaken the middle class even further. If you only look at social media, it seems like Trump wouldn’t win a second term, but some people in favor of Trump don’t speak up because of fear of losing their livelihood. To top that all off, Democrats as a whole have worse voting turn out than Republicans. So far, no Democratic candidate has been able to create the energy needed for a solid voting base.

 

[CaesarCzech]

I believe that the media over estimates their reach. People were certain that Hillary would win and despite the media working against Trump 24/7, he still won. Many of the Democratic candidates do not have any sort of idea of how to win the Rust Belt. The causes they are championing are those only living in big cities might care about. Even then, the policies for “green energy” and trade will only weaken the middle class even further. If you only look at social media, it seems like Trump wouldn’t win a second term, but some people in favor of Trump don’t speak up because of fear of losing their livelihood. To top that all off, Democrats as a whole have worse voting turn out than Republicans. So far, no Democratic candidate has been able to create the energy needed for a solid voting base.

So hilary was compared to Current Lineup ?

 

[Your Weird Fetish]

To be honest, the democrats could shit and piss on the floor at the debates and they'd still probably win. Trump won pretty narrowly against a candidate as shitty as Hillary and now he's had an entire term for spite to build up against him.

It's gonna be a very long time before a presidential victory isn't narrow the way demographics and the in-progress realignment have shaken out. Landslides are a thing of the past.

 

[Very Honest Content]

Wow, they're already doing the fix after two of the front runners got crabpot'ted. And it's conveniently right after Gabbard and other randos nuked Biden AND Harris, but before they could get to Warren.

Gabbard out shined Warren on the same debate stage to open the entire process. Warren was compromised as a debate performer immediately because Gabbard is the closest thing on the screen to replicating Obama's public speaking ability from the current participants in these two sessions of debates. We'll see if in three weeks she can get herself more airtime to keep the momentum up.

Marriane Williamson's crowd reaction this week on Real Time to her introduction was like maybe half to a quarter less raucous and enthusiastic as Gabbard's was in the show preceding this one. I noticed Williamson takes any question and just goes into a hypnotic attempt at induction of whoever is listening to her in reply, using dichotomies every sentence couplet to attempt to induce a response in listeners that will lead to enticing them into a persuasive prone mental state. She also does a verbal 'channeling' technique while asked questions where she'll say a short single phrase of agreement repeatedly in a rhythm with the questioner to try and move them along to a nicer phrasing of the basic inquiry they want to pose to her, in the hopes of being more generously verbally set up for using more inductive trance inducing techniques disguised as her 'answer.' It's all very subliminal, but sinister in its implications once you recognize what exactly it is she's doing and what the intended effects are on whoever is engaged in an exchange of words with her through any medium.

Tulsi Gabbard's little streak of white hair reminds me of Rogue from X-men and that's enough reason to vote for her imo.

Post trip through the siege perilous of course.

Overall this was a better presentation of the candidates because the moderators were much more competent in enforcing both timing procedure and tamping down of response free for all attempts in the wake of answers. Crowd wasn't miked well enough for me to pick out really what either interruption from the audience was attempting to air though.

 

[Your Weird Fetish]

Marriane Williamson's crowd reaction this week on Real Time to her introduction was like maybe half to a quarter less raucous and enthusiastic as Gabbard's was in the show preceding this one. I noticed Williamson takes any question and just goes into a hypnotic attempt at induction of whoever is listening to her in reply, using dichotomies every sentence couplet to attempt to induce a response in listeners that will lead to enticing them into a persuasive prone mental state. She also does a verbal 'channeling' technique while asked questions where she'll say a short single phrase of agreement repeatedly in a rhythm with the questioner to try and move them along to a nicer phrasing of the basic inquiry they want to pose to her, in the hopes of being more generously verbally set up for using more inductive trance inducing techniques disguised as her 'answer.' It's all very subliminal, but sinister in its implications once you recognize what exactly it is she's doing and what the intended effects are on whoever is engaged in an exchange of words with her through any medium.

So she was the dark psychic force all along?

 

[Basil II]

View attachment 874463
And people wonder why they call her the Black Hilary Clinton

lmao implying she's black. There are 100% full blooded Anglo-Saxons who have darker skin color than her.

 

[Shadfan666xxx000]

So she was the dark psychic force all along?

Just like in jojo, we've been worrying about the sane chick when we should really worry about the mind control hippy.

 

[SmallTalk201]

Gabbard out.

Marriane Williamson's crowd reaction this week on Real Time to her introduction was like maybe half to a quarter less raucous and enthusiastic as Gabbard's was in the show preceding this one. I noticed Williamson takes any question and just goes into a hypnotic attempt at induction of whoever is listening to her in reply, using dichotomies every sentence couplet to attempt to induce a response in listeners that will lead to enticing them into a persuasive prone mental state. She also does a verbal 'channeling' technique while asked questions where she'll say a short single phrase of agreement repeatedly in a rhythm with the questioner to try and move them along to a nicer phrasing of the basic inquiry they want to pose to her, in the hopes of being more generously verbally set up for using more inductive trance inducing techniques disguised as her 'answer.' It's all very subliminal, but sinister in its implications once you recognize what exactly it is she's doing and what the intended effects are on whoever is engaged in an exchange of words with her through any medium.

.

Kaa trying to eat Mowgli in the jungle book

Kaa tries to eat Mowgley then puts Bagheera in a trance lol.

m.youtube.com

So what kaa did in the jungle book?

 

[Gar For Archer]

Wouldn't know. I just feel this big dark collective mood in America and it's something I've never witnessed before. It partly why Trump got elected.
it has nothing to do fringe ideologies .

Any time someone says to a trump voter the Donald going to ruin America the come back is often "good. let him."

The urge to destroy is being seen in both sides. One openly embraced it and using it as a means to gain power while The other side is actively ruining stuff while lacking the self awareness They are doing it.

It seems the zeltergist for 21st century America is "fuck you, I got a suicide bombers vest."

This is a deep contrast to the feelings of optimism and hope for the future of 1990s.

People are starting to realize that in the vast majority of cases, when someone tries to engage you on your politics, their goal isn’t to talk about different perspectives or to try to change your view, but to shame you for your beliefs. If someone’s opinion of me is already set in stone based on my beliefs... well, why the fuck do I care what some loony thinks of me?

All this is is the political version of responding “k” to your ex’s drunk texts.