Sea Salt Mine - here there be chimping over the lawsuit

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'd much rather imagine karma biting FUNimation in the ass over this. Either you hate them for maliciously terminating Vic over false accusations, or you have to hate them for not doing something about these very credible true accusations a long, long time ago. There is no middle ground for them and it's fucking beautiful.
 
He still can't comprehend that the standard for malice for a non-public figure is reckless disregard for the truth, not knowledge of falsity. Knowledge of falsity only comes into play if Vic is declared a public figure. He's almost certainly not a general purpose public figure, and there's some good arguments against him being limited-purpose. And court hasn't made a determination on that matter, anyway.

But I find it delicious that even PenguinLie is pulling the knives out for Funimation.
 
He still can't comprehend that the standard for malice for a non-public figure is reckless disregard for the truth, not knowledge of falsity. Knowledge of falsity only comes into play if Vic is declared a public figure. He's almost certainly not a general purpose public figure, and there's some good arguments against him being limited-purpose. And court hasn't made a determination on that matter, anyway.
Actually, there isn't any standard for malice in a claim of defamation of a non-public figure. It's only required to claim defamation of a public figure, and then, the standard of actual malice is knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.
 
Actually, there isn't any standard for malice in a claim of defamation of a non-public figure. It's only required to claim defamation of a public figure, and then, the standard of actual malice is knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.
TIL. I had assumed that some form of malice was needed for defamation.

I can see why the public figure angle is so contested then. It's easier to not need to prove malice at all than it is to prove it.

So I'm guessing reckless disregard and knowledge of falsity are interchangeable in regards to malice?

EDIT: Maybe I'm incorrectly equivocating reckless disregard for negligence.
 
Last edited:
Bitched about bullying, literally kicked from the server for being a bully.
A comedy in three parts.
SmartSelect_20190726-173248_Discord.jpg

SmartSelect_20190726-173303_Discord.jpg

SmartSelect_20190726-173315_Discord.jpg

Shortly after he went crying to daddy Shane on Twitter.
SmartSelect_20190726-180542_Twitter.jpg
 
What the fuck are they banging on about? Who the fuck is using IP addresses (not that I think anyone's above such a thing) to dox anyone when at best it gives you a general area that's easy enough to get from Twitter posts and is useless for anyone behind a VPN. And who needs an archive file of anything when all of it is conveniently hosted here on the farms?

These people have watched too much CSI.

 
Last edited:
What the fuck are they banging on about? Who the fuck is using IP addresses (not that I think anyone's above such a thing) to dox anyone when at best it gives you a general area that's easy enough to get from Twitter posts. And who needs an archive of anything when all of it is conveniently hosted here on the farms?

These people have watched too much CSI.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=hkDD03yeLnU
The dude is just a turbo sped of the most exceptional breed. I enjoy posting his antics for the lulz.
 
He still can't comprehend that the standard for malice for a non-public figure is reckless disregard for the truth, not knowledge of falsity.

It's mere negligence for a non-public figure.

Knowledge of falsity only comes into play if Vic is declared a public figure.

For a public figure, it is actual knowledge of falsity OR reckless disregard for the truth.
 

Where have I heard this before? Oh, yeah:

The deification has already begun.




View attachment 726901View attachment 726902View attachment 726905View attachment 726907View attachment 726908View attachment 726910View attachment 726911View attachment 726912

We're building our own Mount Gamergate.

View attachment 726874

The correlations are all there, right down to the doxxing, threats of harassment and most importantly, the crowd funding.

"Someone called CPS on ThatUmbrellaGuy. You can fight back by donating to his Indiegogo!"
 
He still can't comprehend that the standard for malice for a non-public figure is reckless disregard for the truth, not knowledge of falsity. Knowledge of falsity only comes into play if Vic is declared a public figure. He's almost certainly not a general purpose public figure, and there's some good arguments against him being limited-purpose. And court hasn't made a determination on that matter, anyway.

But I find it delicious that even PenguinLie is pulling the knives out for Funimation.

Funimation can hear the unsheathing noises but doesn't dare look behind them.
Shared by Nick in his Discord server. This one's a winner.

View attachment 861184

These people really have no idea what's going on right now, do they?

Did... Did that guy have a stroke? He has no social awareness at all.
 
Oh boy...


https://twitter.com/DeepHumor/status/1156035962876510210 // http://archive.li/6DsKq

Not sure if this is "Sea Salt Mine" material, but this just looks like dumb decisions all around. SiH shouldn't have made a tier list about a community that he's a part of when they're supposedly cooperating towards a common goal, and DH shouldn't find it necessary to do a response to a video that was altogether removed by the creator (implying that he doesn't stand by the video).
 
Oh boy...


https://twitter.com/DeepHumor/status/1156035962876510210 // http://archive.li/6DsKq
Not sure if this is "Sea Salt Mine" material, but this just looks like dumb decisions all around. SiH shouldn't have made a tier list about a community that he's a part of when they're supposedly cooperating towards a common goal, and DH shouldn't find it necessary to do a response to a video that was altogether removed by the creator (implying that he doesn't stand by the video).

Some great exceptionalism is happening here. http://archive.is/z2UNX

"You disagreed with me, how dare you!"
SmartSelect_20190730-121734_Twitter.jpg


"How dare you don't just blindly agree with me!"
SmartSelect_20190730-121753_Twitter.jpg


"It's all Cody's fault!"
SmartSelect_20190730-121813_Twitter.jpg


:story:
 
Some great exceptionalism is happening here. http://archive.li/z2UNX

"You disagreed with me, how dare you!"
View attachment 867062

"How dare you don't just blindly agree with me!"
View attachment 867064

"It's all Cody's fault!"
View attachment 867066

:story:

I really wanted to see where he ranked KiwiFarms.

RT though, Senpaishome is the typical 20-year-old knoweverything. He attacks anyone who doesn't outright agree with him, exceptional little hanger-on.
 
Back
Top Bottom