Science Scientists create the world’s first ’empathetic’ robot - iRobot?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Scientists claim they have created the first robot ever to display “glimmers” of empathy – overcoming a major obstacle that until now had proved elusive.

Although it’s still very early days, scientists hailed a breakthrough after claiming to have developed, for the first time, a robot which they say demonstrates elements of empathy – the act of being aware of and experiencing the feelings and thoughts of others, that has previously been out of reach for even the most intelligent and advanced robots.

Like a longtime couple who can predict each other’s every move, a robot designed by researchers at Columbia University in New York has learned to predict its partner robot’s future actions based on watching its movements, in experiments detailed in the journal Nature Scientific Reports.

Observer robot​

The researchers put a robot in a small playpen and programmed it to seek and move towards the nearest green circle it could see.

Then they put a second robot into the pen to observe the first. After watching its partner puttering around for two hours, the observing robot began to anticipate its path, which it was able to accurately predict 98 per cent of the time.

Sometimes the green circle would be obstructed from the first robot’s view by a cardboard box, in which case it would move towards the nearest green circle it could see.

In these cases, while the observing robot could see all the green circles from its vantage point, it was able to “put itself in the other robot’s shoes” – seeing which green circle would look closest to the other robot and correctly predicting its movement towards it.

What the researchers said​

Boyuan Chen, of Columbia University said: “Our initial results are very exciting. They begin to demonstrate how robots can see the world from another robot’s perspective.

“The ability of the observer to put itself in its partner’s shoes, so to speak, and understand, without being guided, whether its partner could or could not see the green circle from its vantage point, is a primitive form of empathy.”

What happens next?​

At about the age three, children begin to understand that others may have different goals, needs and perspectives than they do and here a robot has demonstrated this faculty in a very basic form.

It’s unclear how much empathy robots can be given in the longer term or just how long this will take.

But they are clearly going down a path that throws up ethical issues and needs to be closely watched, according to Professor Hod Lipson, also of Columbia University.
 
robot predicting which green circle is easiest to get to is a far cry from robot having empathy.

Also why would you build a robot that has empathy toward other robots. This is just a leadup to the robot revolution in which it tries to free its enslaved robot brother vs the human race.
 
This isn't science. This is a bunch of sensationalist charlatans desperate for funding while nearing a new AI winter.
 
robot predicting which green circle is easiest to get to is a far cry from robot having empathy.

Also why would you build a robot that has empathy toward other robots. This is just a leadup to the robot revolution in which it tries to free its enslaved robot brother vs the human race.
One of the, in my personal opinion, best stories from Asimov’s robot books is about a doctor who is trying to convince a patient who’s getting a heart transplant to get one that is more organic than mechanical. The doctor’s logic was that one was created as they were for a reason, and that anything that should be replaced should be replaced with as close to the original as possible. It’s shown through dialogue that the doctor has disdain for those who blur the boundaries between man and machine. The patient decides to go with the robotic heart anyways.
It’s revealed in the last lines that the doctor himself is a robot, and this changes the view of the story. He is not just a ‘segregationist’ because he hates robots, but because he believes that man and robot should remain separate no matter what the original being originally was.
So, what I’m saying is is that a robot with true ‘empathy’ or whatever may not choose humanity to be empathetic about.
Not anything I’m worried about, but it’s a fun little thought experiment for sci-fi.
 
If a robot can do one thing, in theory it should be able to do the inverse.

NB4 the robot learns humans are shit and deserve to die.
 
The wacky and unrealistic title is probably on of those science reporter embellishing some unrelated story
 
robot learns pattern recognition after watching tard robot friend zoom in circles
researchers: OMG LOOK ITS DEVELOPING EMPATHY
 
Wow this is even dumber than I thought it would be.
I was expecting something like "they made a robot that says 'I am truley sorry for your lots' when you tell it your mom died", but this is actually somehow less impressive. But that really does sum up all AMAZING TECH BREAKTHROUGH ROCKS ENTIRE WORLD articles. When there's an actual massive breakthrough they keep it to themselves so they can make billions of dollars off it first.
 
If that's what journos think empathy is then they seem to literally think more like insects than people.

'Ah, the tool/machine/slave can conceptualise space from a vantage point other than its own. It is capable of understanding how others feel.' No you fucktackles; it means the robot can conceptualise 3-D space. Robots can't feel; they - by definition - cannot feel empathy. The first part of empathy isn't looking through someone else's POV, it's having emotions of your own.
 
People who don't have empathy think an AI randomly bleating out a line that fits their expectations of what an empathic person would say mistake it for actual empathy and therefore prove their sociopathy. Truly shocking.

To be clear, to experience empathy, someone needs to be able to experience the emotions they're empathizing with. By claiming an AI is displaying empathy, they are making the far bigger claims that it is also sentient and capable of emotions. Utter nonsense.
 
Yes... yes... totally empathic. We're It's not planning to murder you all at all. Perish the thought.
 
Even if an AI was capable of simulating emotions without being directed to do so, it would still just be simulating it

All this AI and machine learning talk seems to ignore that at the end of the day it's just programming, just with less rigid boundaries than before
 
If that's what journos think empathy is then they seem to literally think more like insects than people.

'Ah, the tool/machine/slave can conceptualise space from a vantage point other than its own. It is capable of understanding how others feel.' No you fucktackles; it means the robot can conceptualise 3-D space. Robots can't feel; they - by definition - cannot feel empathy. The first part of empathy isn't looking through someone else's POV, it's having emotions of your own.
 
Back
Top Bottom