- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Christopher Barnatt from Explaining Computers scratches the autism button in the most dry and deadpan way possible. When he opens things, he has a minor character named "Mr. Scissors". It's a pair of scissors.
fuck a board with PoE or anything actually useful, no, why not a rainbow keyboard.Pi 500 Gaymer Edition
I skimmed through it, but I didn't see him mention the laptop that seems like inspiration for the mockup in the screenshot.
Jeff Geerling mentioned there being room for PoE on the Pi 500+, kind of like the unpopulated M.2 from before: https://youtu.be/Dv3RRAx7G6E?t=257fuck a board with PoE or anything actually useful, no, why not a rainbow keyboard.
For their SBCs, they lean on the optional HATs to add PoE. I guess they will never make it present by default: https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/poe-hat/Speaking of things still missing, there's a huge cutout over here for what I assume is a Power over Ethernet transformer. But all that stuff over there is just dead space. I have to wonder if they'll make like a Pi 500++ version of this thing that also has PoE support and maybe a pre-installed battery.
You have to do some mental gymnastics or really be into mechanical keyboards for it to make sense. A discount like Micro Center -$20 + open box -20% would help too.Personally, the Pi 500+ seems silly. I have a 500 for a "Garage" computer to look things up when I'm working on stuff but it doesn't need fancy colored keys. Nor does using them in an educational or similar environment.
Personally, the Pi 500+ seems silly. I have a 500 for a "Garage" computer to look things up when I'm working on stuff but it doesn't need fancy colored keys. Nor does using them in an educational or similar environment.
I skimmed through it, but I didn't see him mention the laptop that seems like inspiration for the mockup in the screenshot.
View attachment 7974712
The price of DDR4 memory has increased dramatically in recent months due to limited supply and increased demand for AI workloads. The Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 and 5 (CM4/CM5) are based on LPDDR4 memory, and Raspberry Pi reports that memory costs are roughly 120% higher than they were just a year ago.
So they have no choice but to increase the price by $5 to $10 for the CM4 and CM5, as well as the Raspberry Pi 500 keyboard PC. I assume the $200 price tag for the Raspberry Pi 500+ mechanical keyboard PC released last week already includes this new reality.
Stanley the Knife is another minor character, named after a popular brand of box cutter (a box cutter is commonly known as a "Stanley Knife" in the UK and Australia).Christopher Barnatt from Explaining Computers scratches the autism button in the most dry and deadpan way possible. When he opens things, he has a minor character named "Mr. Scissors". It's a pair of scissors.
I can see the appeal of the Pi 500+ if you're a hardcore Pi fan and don't already have a Pi 400 or Pi 500, or if you can't stand the keyboard on either of those. imho the Pi 400's keyboard is little better than a rubber-keyed ZX Spectrum, and I would consider buying a Pi 500+ to replace my Pi 400 if I used said Pi 400 on a regular basis.Personally, the Pi 500+ seems silly. I have a 500 for a "Garage" computer to look things up when I'm working on stuff but it doesn't need fancy colored keys. Nor does using them in an educational or similar environment.
it definitely doesnt look like its 60Hz on video, but damn if it isnt fast for an eink. i wonder how much that refresh affects the power consumption though, which in my mind is one of the main reasons someone would even use an eink in the firstplaceI am still kinda jonesing for a proper eink screen and there is a ~10" one by Dasung with 60 Hz (!) refresh
Have you seen SHARP memory displays? They are a hybrid between LCD and E-ink but with low power consumption https://www.adafruit.com/product/4694I am still kinda jonesing for a proper eink screen and there is a ~10" one by Dasung with 60 Hz (!) refresh
I read text, books, or comics on tablets/laptops frequently, preferring infinite scrolling to page turning. Smooth scrolling and responsive UI alone would be a significant improvement for e-ink, while only intermittently using power.it definitely doesnt look like its 60Hz on video, but damn if it isnt fast for an eink. i wonder how much that refresh affects the power consumption though, which in my mind is one of the main reasons someone would even use an eink in the firstplace
Yes, I thought so too but I did the research when my luggable project came together and believe it or not, eink is actually not all that low power if there's constant refreshes going on. Couple that with the fact that all kinds of eink monitor setups usually are pretty niche and don't have these off-the-shelf 1-chip-solution ASICs normal monitors have now and often use things like FPGAs and the power consumption of your average eink monitor is actually a bit higher than of a normal monitor. I hope that is not the case if you make small partial refreshes on a hopefully somewhat better put together screen like the Dasung. The trick ereaders use to be so low power is to redraw the page when you turn it and then basically cut the eink panel off and put whatever ARM SoC they use to sleep immediately. In monitor use on a normal OS it's not that simple I'm afraid.power consumption
SHARP memory displays
Have you looked at RLCD?
simplicity, low power draw, and small die size.Never obsolete.
View attachment 8005321
Partial joke aside, I really don't know why this particular core has persisted for so long in low-power applications like phones and SBCs. The A55 is from 2017 and still hasn't killed it off. I've heard that the A510 (successor to the A55) is apparently more power-hungry and inefficient, kinda boggles my mind. Any of you know what makes the A53 so special? I'm not the best with hardware, sorry.
*Checks tablet* yeah I have eight of those.Never obsolete.
Partial joke aside, I really don't know why this particular core has persisted for so long in low-power applications like phones and SBCs. The A55 is from 2017 and still hasn't killed it off. I've heard that the A510 (successor to the A55) is apparently more power-hungry and inefficient, kinda boggles my mind. Any of you know what makes the A53 so special? I'm not the best with hardware, sorry.
In terms of performance metrics, much like on the X2 and A710 presentation slides, the figures for the A510 aren’t very apples-to-apples as we’re comparing a Cortex-A55 with 32KB L1, 128KB L2 and 4MB L3 versus a Cortex-A510 with 32KB L1, 256KB L2 and 8MB L3. Frequency between the two cores is said to be the same. Under that scenario, we’re seeing +35% in SPECint2006 and +50% in SPECfp2006, which are seemingly very solid generational improvements, however given the cache hierarchy discrepancy as well as the fact that we’re comparing scores to a 4+ year old core, the actual improvements, especially from a compound annual growth rate (CAGR), doesn’t seem to be all that impressive.
Looking at the projected performance and power curves on an ISO-process comparison, the new A510 seems rather lackluster from an efficiency standpoint. The ISO-power and ISO-performance gains are respectively +10% performance and -20% power, but the latter is really only valid for the high-end of the A55’s frequency curve, all the while the A510 pretty much overlaps the A55’s curve at lower operating points. While the A510 offers overall better performance, this seems to mostly be a product of extending the efficiency curve to higher power levels, and I was frankly disappointed to see this.
We’ll have to wait for the new generation SoCs to actually hit the market for us to test the new A510 cores, but if indeed they come with larger power consumption operating points to achieve higher performance, then Arm won't be much nearer in catching up to what Apple has been doing with their efficiency cores. As of the latest generation of SoCs, Apple’s efficiency cores were around 4x faster than any Cortex-A55 based SoC. Which, running at roughly the same system active power, also made them 3-4x more efficient in the traditional benchmarks. As presented, a theoretical A510 SoC won't be able to close that efficiency gap at all.
The A55 has much in common with the A53, which is not surprising because the A53 already delivers good core throughput. While the A55 gets some improvements to the NEON/FP pipes, mostly from additional instructions courtesy of ARMv8.2, most of its performance gains come from changes to the memory system meant to reduce both the number of core stalls and their latency impact when they do occur.
@NH-8340Qualcomm has just signed an agreement to acquire Arduino, and the goal of the purchase is to “combine Qualcomm’s leading-edge products and technologies with Arduino’s vast ecosystem and community to empower businesses, students, entrepreneurs, tech professionals, educators, and enthusiasts to quickly and easily bring ideas to life.”
They also took the opportunity to launch the Arduino UNO Q “dual-brain” SBC powered by a Qualcomm DragonWing QRB2210 SoC running Linux and an STMicro STM32U585 MCU for real-time control, as well as the Arduino App Lab integrated development environment to “unify the Arduino journey across Real‑time OS, Linux, Python, and AI flows”.
Application SoC/MPU – Qualcomm QRB2210
CPU – Quad-core Cortex-A53 processor at up to 2.0 GHz
This doesn't actually seem all that bad. I think the A53 is a fantastic product even today for embedded devices (and well, Arduino stuff). I only expressed frustration with its continued use in consumer electronics, things like phone SoCs. It kinda reminds me of how the Intel Quark CPUs were using the same architecture as old Pentiums since they did the job and didn't use a lot of energy.We got a big deal here.
Ars Technica: Qualcomm buys Arduino, releases new Raspberry Pi-esque Arduino board
CNX Software: Qualcomm acquires Arduino, introduces Arduino UNO Q “dual-brain” SBC
@NH-8340