I doubt that any DA would prosecute someone under an untested law unless it was 100% cut and dry. Considering that I did not assist anyone physically, there's really not much they can do, and they would likely lose.
Spoken like a real nigger. "I haven't yet been charged so I didn't do anything illegal, and they never charged anyone under that law yet anyhow" is very thin ice on which to skate. There's already laws on the books that could get you in serious trouble, and most of the reason your chickens have yet to come back to roost is the relative obscurity of Sanctioned Suicide and the jurisdictional rat-king it presents: you have two admins, one of whom lives abroad, the site, hosted abroad, victims, many of whom lived abroad, and users inciting suicide residing in diverse unknown areas. But I don't think that these deliberate actions you took to frustrate a potential prosecution means you're innocent.
Again, I was not required to go to those lengths by law. The Sanctioned Suicide subreddit was freely available to everyone with no restrictions before it got suspended from Reddit, and it had the same content as the forum.
Says you. Fucking risky business IMO, but you're a true nigger who doesn't care until you go to booking I guess. The fact that you were assessing prospie accounts for true suicidality but not making them age-verify for real, not just a stupid lil CAPTCHA checkbox, is profoundly retarded on your part.
All of these things are gross, and you should be judged for supporting them, but they should not be illegal to say, post, or promote - Because society is better off with these freaks outing themselves through speech. Because it's important to discuss and critique awful things, and to show examples of negative behavior. Because fiction can and should portray evil people - Even evil people doing evil things and promoting those evil things - without explicitly passing judgement, and instead leaving it for the viewer to figure out.Was Nabokov promoting the sexual abuse of a tween? Was he trying to show how easy it was to sympathize with an irredeemable villain if you only had his side of the story? A hundred years of literary interpretation have not settled on an answer, and that's why we need free speech - Even of awful things you disagree with.
I am a free speech absolutist because faggots and commies will use any restrictions on speech as a cudgel. They will claim your posting of evidence of their degeneracy is against the rules, because rules used to prevent the promotion of antisocial behavior inevitably get abused by those looking to promote said behaviors to silence their critics. "Lollita" itself falls fully into this.
Of course, I'm arguing this in response to a degenerate faggot who's trying to do exactly that, prevent people from seeing awful behavior for what it is by silencing discussion of it, so STFU and get out of our forum, our society, our living ecosystem and physical reality.
I'm not really against just plain offensive content, porn content, etc. Controversial novels are not what I'm MATI about. My problem is that SS's content has notably ended with real people dead, and this is basically the purpose of the community. Acts of protected speech shouldn't result in deaths, and something's gone wrong if they do.
If you are a (((free speech absolutist))) you are inherently pro lolicon/shotacon.
Please have a seat over there or rethink the mental framework you've adopted from an autism forum
Lolicon and shotacon also seem a bridge too far for me.
You're free to ask any Alabama lawyer questions about the law if you want. I'm not asking you to believe me, but the laws surrounding this situation is pretty clear and the advice that I was given seems pretty clear.
I will. Thanks for the tip. (Though my lawfag friends already told me so.)
Those cases are under Pennsylvania and Minnesota state law,
MASSACHUSETTS and MN state law, nigger. Get it right or you look like a moron.
The protections offered by Section 230 is probably the only reason that you're even able to use this site. It's extremely important to the internet in general because most forums or social media sites would not be able to exist without it.
Yeah and I still think you're abusing Section 230 for reasons I already explained. You've deliberately avoided the fact that you curate the community so it's suicidal people making other suicidal people more suicidal, banning any users who might lighten the mood or suggest to your flock of suicidal people that their lives have potential for improvement. That's where I think the "I'm just a neutral admin, I have nothing to do with this" don't pass the sniff test.
Not for nothing: THE FUCK is your sleep schedule like? You live in central time and you post at like 4 in the morning.
Can you just go see a therapist already? You're obviously mentally ill and whatever you're doing isn't helping.
