Sanctioned Suicide - "Kill yourself" but unironically with sodium nitrite. Higher death count than the Farms. Targeted by parents, legislators, and journalists looking to alter Section 230.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
robtical.png




222.png
 
melo said:
View attachment 5492932



View attachment 5492935
Click to expand...

How do either of these prove what you're claiming? It seems that you're cherrypicking statements again, and you've clearly shown that you're not a reliable source for information, as many here have corrected you because you've pulled everything out of context in an attempt to make things seem evil when it's not. Robtical hasn't been a moderator for months and you bring this up now?

You're attempting to derail a thread that is about SS and making it about something else entirely. There is an Incels.is thread that you can bring this up in.
 
afounder said:
How do either of these prove what you're claiming? It seems that you're cherrypicking statements again, and you've clearly shown that you're not a reliable source for information, as many here have corrected you because you've pulled everything out of context in an attempt to make things seem evil when it's not. Robtical hasn't been a moderator for months and you bring this up now?

You're attempting to derail a thread that is about SS and making it about something else entirely. There is an Incels.is thread that you can bring this up in.
Click to expand...
Hope you have a horrible life.
 
 
afounder said:
I'm glad that you could produce actual evidence, but he has already been removed from staff. However, we will look into this.
Click to expand...
Those took 5 seconds to find with Google, just now, and this was already pointed out for years, publicly. He was mod on your .is forum for years along with 1-2 more pedos.
 
Last edited:
melo said:
Those took 5 seconds to find with Google and this was already pointed out for years. He was mod on your site for years along with 1-2 more pedos.
Click to expand...

Actually, it wasn't pointed out "for years" and this is my first time hearing of it. It sounded like you just wanted the attention and a chance to attempt to get back at someone that you think have wronged you.

As for the other "pedos" if you find any actual proof, you can post it here and I'll get it handled.

For example, when I removed you from the Wiki.
 
afounder said:
Actually, it wasn't pointed out "for years" and this is my first time hearing of it.
Click to expand...
yes, it was, publicly
hope you have a horrible life
You have hidden mods and admins so how can I even trust you are removing people.
You also claim to consider the first two screens I posted to be "not evidence of pedophilia" as well, which is deranged.
 
Last edited:
CAPTAIN MATI said:
Your thread sucks.
What? You gonna defend child porn sharing sites because of funky shenanigans used against them too, nigger?
How about you grow the fuck up and learn how to pick your battles.
Fucking loser niggers. Make me sick.

Fuck your speech and fuck your choice.
Click to expand...

Fuck you too faggot, go choke on a dick and die.

This site wouldn't exist if Null didn't put his ass on the line for you to post this bullshit.
 
melo said:
yes, it was
Click to expand...
Well since you finally actually started posting screencaps and archives, it should be easy for you to post screencaps and/or archives showing that these people have been previously reported.

Make no mistake: most people in this thread aren't fans of incels.is (myself included), but you yourself have repeatedly lied in this thread and have given ample reason for people to distrust everything you say without proof, especially if it's for the purpose of scoring points against Lamarcus, so accompany your accusations with actual proof or shut the fuck up.

Additionally, nothing you've posted speaks to the legality or illegality of SaSu.

CAPTAIN MATI said:
What? You gonna defend child porn sharing sites because of funky shenanigans used against them too, nigger?
Click to expand...
You know that child porn is actually illegal, right?

CAPTAIN MATI said:
Fuck your speech
Click to expand...
Lol
 
Sprate Header said:
Well since you finally actually started posting screencaps and archives, it should be easy for you to post screencaps and/or archives showing that these people have been previously reported.
Click to expand...

This is actually the first time of me hearing about this, but the person that was a moderator was modded during a time that I left the forum. When I came back like a year or so ago, I sorted most of this crap out.

Sprate Header said:
Make no mistake: most people in this thread aren't fans of incels.is (myself included), but you yourself have repeatedly lied in this thread and have given ample reason for people to distrust everything you say without proof, especially if it's for the purpose of scoring points against Lamarcus, so accompany your accusations with actual proof or shut the fuck up.
Click to expand...

He has repeatedly made claims that he couldn't back up and he's on his 4th alt account here. If you have to take out of context screenshots and make statements that you can't back any of it up with evidence, then people are simply not going to believe you.

Sprate Header said:
Additionally, nothing you've posted speaks to the legality or illegality of SaSu.
Click to expand...

In the 79 pages on this thread, the first actual valid claim about something and it's not even about SaSu.
 
Screening and linking all the rest of public, pedophilia on Lamarcus Small's site .is would take about 1000+ pages of this thread
 
Sprate Header said:
Cool, post proof of your claim that they've been repeatedly reported.
Click to expand...
The most likely reason small isn't deleting it himself after newsmedia pointed out all the pedos on his site (it takes no effort to find) is because that would destroy the conversational make-up of countless threads.
 
Sprate Header said:
Evidently it does, since getting you to post proof is liking pulling teeth.
Click to expand...
I posted two screens of his mod Robtical being a clear pedophile, and small claimed it was not evidence of pedophilia. It was his job at that point to find the rest to "make up his mind". But I went ahead and just Googled "AOC robtical" instead for him. Was pointless though beause he already knew robtical was a pedo. If you don't find it concerning he didn't consider the first two screens evidence of pedophilia, you're just a generic sociopath and not much reason to continue the conversation.
 
Last edited:
melo said:
The most likely reason small isn't deleting it himself after newsmedia pointed out all the pedos on his site (it takes no effort to find) is because that would destroy the conversational make-up of countless threads.
Click to expand...

If it takes "no effort to find" why not show us proof that the claims were repeatedly reported, or were you saving up this claims to beat me over the head with them later?
 
melo said:
I posted two screens of his mod Robtical being a clear pedophile, and small claimed it was not evidence of pedophilia. It was his job at that point to find the rest. But I went ahead and just Googled "AOC robtical" instead for him. Was pointless though beause he already knew robtical was a pedo. If you don't find it concerning he didn't consider the first two screens evidence of pedophilia, you're just a generic sociopath and not much reason to continue the conversation.
Click to expand...
Can I get a "yes, I concede that I am incapable of proving my claim that Robitcal being a pedophile was repeatedly, publicly called out before now" ?

Or is there proof of this out there and you're just too handicapped to actually post it?

afounder said:
or were you saving up this claims to beat me over the head with them later?
Click to expand...
The Yiannapolous Gambit, lol
 
Doubly Punished Snigger said:
I asked the admins about how they take preventative measures to avoid predatory sadists.
Click to expand...
tbf, any real meaningful preventative measures would have to compromise privacy; what are you going to do, background check everybody who registers?
This isn't a job application and unless you have better ideas, the most you can do is ban those types of people when their intentions are made clear.

This already gets enforced by @RaS (current admin) regularly btw
1699976282020.png

A place like this will inevitably attract people with bad intentions—not any more so than subreddits like r/teenagers or Discord would attract pedophiles, but there's not much noise to de-platform those services. This is just the inherent way social media works, unless they reveal themselves you can't take any action. This same rule applies in the real world too, plenty of predators pursue positions that lets them be around children (e..g being an elementary teacher) or how some men become "passport bros" as a way of sex tourism. But action isn't ever taken unless it's reported or they out themselves.


That's the cost of freedom, it's always an ongoing battle, and unless you want to microchip everyone you can't broadly prevent some people with predatory intentions from infiltrating your circles. You as an individual (and assumed adult) are responsible for your own safety, what you choose to see, and who you choose to interact with. On SS, there's already been such cases of suspicious members

1699979925988.png


1699980697857.png

And there's likely more, but no one's responsible for the decsions you make, if you seek out the partner section there's a possibilty you might find someone who you can die with, but there's also a possibility you'll just end up murdered too—it's all a risk and you can't 100 % be sure of someone's intentions. If you don't want want to be coereced/influence into do anything you don't wan to, change your dm settings or simply just get the fuck off the site.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom