🎭 Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
RW's claims on Anita are such that any editor who wanted to provoke chimp-outs could do so simply hammering her on the logic holes alone. Each one of the segments on that article have giant gaps that you could park Broseph's Tank in one of the damned things. In order to further the cause of enabling detractors of RW to hit the thing with the equivalent of artillery strikes, here's one example:

RationalWiki on Comparisons to Jack Thimpson said:
No. Jack Thompson claimed that violent video games made the children that played them more violent and prone to school shootings, and pushed for legislation to ban them and to hold the developers responsible in murder cases.

Scientific studies have disproven his hypothesis. Anita Sarkeesian's point is that sexist depictions of women in popular media perpetuate sexist ideas in society. And there have been studies that support her assertion,[42][43][44][45] which she cites in the supplementary material to her videos.[46]
It's also important to note here, because her detractors constantly refuse to acknowledge this fact, that she does not want to ban video games. She wants the industry to stop relying on sexist tropes in their stories so video games no longer perpetuate sexism in society. She is not trying to restrict creative freedom, but influence people to change on their own accord. And the industry is eagerly listening to her as she has been invited to speak at various tech conferences and video game studios over the past 3 years.
Despite all this, people still froth at the mouth when she expresses her personal opinions on video games, particularly when it regards her personal distaste in violence as a mechanic. People leapt on her when she criticized Fallout 4 and the new DOOM at E3 2015,[47][48] prompting her collaborator Jonathan McIntosh to tell the mobs that they don't want to ban anything when they're critical of it[49] but only encountered her detractors doubling down on their original conclusions.[50] She's expressed similar opinions with other violent media, saying she didn't find Mad Max: Fury Road a feminist masterpiece[51] which others disagreed with,[52] but there's no MadMaxGate out to get her. Imagine that
Click to expand...
Anita's Studies are fundamentally flawed and have been categorically disproven too, but there's an even better and more hilarious reason that the sources that RW cites cannot be used:

They're all paywalled. Every single one. The first article costs $6 to look at beyond the entry and the others are 50 a pop.

I.E. - There is no way, without paying money, to fact-check any of these studies (and yes, they're categorically wrong).
 
Jaimas said:
RW's claims on Anita are such that any editor who wanted to provoke chimp-outs could do so simply hammering her on the logic holes alone. Each one of the segments on that article have giant gaps that you could park Broseph's Tank in one of the damned things. In order to further the cause of enabling detractors of RW to hit the thing with the equivalent of artillery strikes, here's one example:


Anita's Studies are fundamentally flawed and have been categorically disproven too, but there's an even better and more hilarious reason that the sources that RW cites cannot be used:

They're all paywalled. Every single one. The first article costs $6 to look at beyond the entry and the others are 50 a pop.

I.E. - There is no way, without paying money, to fact-check any of these studies (and yes, they're categorically wrong).
Click to expand...
They made a pedo their Hamburger Hill; Hack-Fraud Anita is like the meadow behind Hamburger hill by comparison. Mainly because defending a pedo makes you even bigger scum than the pedo.
 
http://jojo.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:MetallicKaiser/@comment-Ryulong-20151227030026?oldid=108542

Josefumi
Ryulong
Why did you move the page back to "Josefumi" when "JYOSEFUMI" is in all English caps in the raws? Is there something I missed?

20 hours ago

MetallicKaiser
It was dicussed briefly in another thread, but apparently they use a completely different romanization standard for Japanese passports that require them to list it "Jo" as "Jyo"? It was a bit difficult for me to research though, so we just went with it.

Edited by MetallicKaiser 20 hours ago
Click to expand...
 
A sampling of Ryulong II butthurt over the Aneeda shrine being ever so slightly edited to make her look bad:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...esian&curid=157234&diff=1597319&oldid=1597227

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...esian&curid=157234&diff=1597349&oldid=1597347

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...esian&curid=157234&diff=1597342&oldid=1597341

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...esian&curid=157234&diff=1597355&oldid=1597354

Adam, even Sarkeesian is cutting and run from her own inane bullshit because the con is becoming unsustainable. And damn man, I know you want to be a lesbian catgirl and suck tranny cock, but whiteknighting a con artist in the business of hauling ass away from her own bullshit will not bring your fantasies of getting it up the ass from tranny catgirls (or being one) any closer to reality.
 
Last edited:
He's learned so much from Ryulong how to be such an insufferable ass kisser like that. Sarkeesian does not need to be white knighted this way.
 
That's a mischaracterization of what I've been saying. Anita's personal views aren't missional enough to warrant a topic here of her own, because quite frankly, there's nothing wrong with a lot of them, and at most they're just benign and inoffensive, and overly pacifist. Sure, there's general missionality to the beliefs themselves, but on a personal level, she isn't noteworthy. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 00:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Hmm, ten minutes ago you said she wasn't missional; now you switch to saying she's missional but not notable. OK then. What would make her notable? ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐMethinks it is a Weasel 00:50, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

"She [the person] isn't missional [on her own]". I believe I went out of my way to emphasize this. My stances haven't changed, I just rephrased them in a more immediately understandable (i.e "skim-read proof") way. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 00:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Click to expand...

Mona believes Aneeda is a "true victim."

Anita Sarkeesian is missional because she and her views are at the core of a huge shitfest that primarily occurred online involving feminism and wingnut misogynists. It reached all over, from Twitter, to web sites to Facebook. Sarkeesian's specific ideology, many aspects of it, are discussed in other articles at this wiki. Given that those views are deemed sufficiently missional to merit their own articles, there's no reason they are not also misisonal in this article. Her views drive the animus against her. Addressing those views -- as merely a relatively small portion of the article -- is entirely proper. As has been pointed out, she's no different than the New Atheists we treat here when we discuss why they are controversial. She's a true victim, but that doesn't mean her views are immunized from all critique. No one looking for ammo against her is going to find this site to be the first, second or even 10th best place to find it. The contrary argument has no persuasive power at all.---Mona- (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Click to expand...
 
"it reached all over, from Twitter to web sites to Facebook"

Yup, that sure is a wide ranging issue there. Do any of these fucktards ever leave their house?

Maybe if they went outside they'd realize that life is more then a few lines on the computer screen.
 
Adam spergs in traditional Ryulong fashion:


Aneris retorts: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...esian&curid=157234&diff=1597419&oldid=1597388

There's more wrong with the article than mona and carpetsmoker realize, but I found it useful as a "point and laugh" entry to the RationalWiki. I'm with Kitsunelaine. You cannot taint it with reason and rationality, asking questions and being critical and such things. Listen and Believe! The "mission" was already revealed as a farce, since despite overbearing authoritarianism, there are no attempts to describe the social justice movement (including Sarkeesian) at all. Remember, it's a snarl word, but the brogressive is a thing. The RationalWiki decided to be openly apologetic and has revealed plainly that nobody is interested in looking at a situation and describing it as it is, not even with snark. The talk about "ammo" further documents it. There is no such thing as "ammo", because something is either true, or not true (with some caveats). The "mission" is thus revealed to be providing "ammo" for interested sides, which is not science, rationality and reason, but the social justice movement. That's of course widely known by now, hence all these articles are written for that purpose (e.g. timelines) and all of them are hilariously one-sided (because else would provide "ammo" for the wrong side). You couldn't have it clearer. I have no problem with that. Either way works. The SJW path leads steadily downhill and provides lulz along the way, even when I'd prefer to turn it around. — Aneris Ѽ 03:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Click to expand...
 
Cynical said:
Adam, even Sarkeesian is cutting and run from her own inane bullshit because the con is becoming unsustainable. And damn man, I know you want to be a lesbian catgirl and suck tranny cock, but whiteknighting a con artist in the business of hauling ass away from her own bullshit will not bring your fantasies of getting it up the ass from tranny catgirls (or being one) any closer to reality.
Click to expand...
You give Adamu too much credit; he merely faps to that shit and uses his fetish to pretend he's a tranny or otherkin.
 
No wonder, that some thought at first glance, that Fox Wave (when I looked at her screename, I thought, that it's "Kitsune Laine" and "Laine" is an Estonian female name meaning "wave". According to her, her family name is "Elaine") is a sock of Ryulong.
 
systemlord_baal said:
No wonder, that some thought at first glance, that Fox Wave (when I looked at her screename, I thought, that it's "Kitsune Laine" and "Laine" is an Estonian female name meaning "wave". According to her, her family name is "Elaine") is a sock of Ryulong.
Click to expand...

Nah it's Morland we doxed him good. Also he's not a tranny just an autogynephile you don't have to embarrass yourself using female pronouns lol.
 
Dynastia said:
Nah it's Morland we doxed him good. Also he's not a tranny just an autogynephile you don't have to embarrass yourself using female pronouns lol.
Click to expand...
Yes, I found the dox about him after looking here a lil. Thx for the info.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom