RWBY - The Hindenburg on which Rooster Teeth rests its hopes, dreams and future

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
She was introduced as an immature, antisocial fanatic of weapons who had a drive to be a huntress.
She was antisocial for maybe three episodes and has never been a /k/tier weapon sperg outside of that one line that tells us she built her own scythe off-screen before episode 1.
It's like how Qrow being a former teacher and a master of the scythe has never come up at all, ever.
It's like we have 2 completely different characters but they wield the same weapon and powers.
We never even had the first, it's been shit all the way down for Ruby Rose.
 
She was antisocial for maybe three episodes and has never been a /k/tier weapon sperg outside of that one line that tells us she built her own scythe off-screen before episode 1.
Don't forget that brief moment where she gushes over some weapons offscreen when she gets to Beacon.
 
Well that would change things.

85C5C223-DA44-4743-801D-8EBF29A04684.jpeg
 
Well that would change things.

View attachment 2685168
The whole discrimination subplot just falls apart because the faunus are biologically the superior species. They all have innate night vision alongside other animal traits. All of those would aid in survival. I recall in one of the lore videos that human-faunus offspring are always faunus. Humanity would be in the right to discriminate against the faunus because they pose a threat to the survival of humanity. This would be comparable to humans vs neanderthals, if everyone back then lived as we do.

They want a discrimination subplot? I can think of two right now. Kingdoms; each has their own biases and stereotypes of each other, sometimes hard to work together. Could be useful as a message on xenophobia. The other kind of discrimination I'm thinking of; class. The rich can afford to pay the huntsmen but not the poor. Go on a social darwinism analogue and have the poor be viewed as unable to save themselves by the people who have to pay others to save them. But these concepts would have required Miles, Kerry, and even Monty to pick up a book on social science and that would left them less time to watch anime; their true inspiration for the series.
 
The whole discrimination subplot just falls apart because the faunus are biologically the superior species. They all have innate night vision alongside other animal traits. All of those would aid in survival. I recall in one of the lore videos that human-faunus offspring are always faunus. Humanity would be in the right to discriminate against the faunus because they pose a threat to the survival of humanity. This would be comparable to humans vs neanderthals, if everyone back then lived as we do.
And people wonder why Adam Taurus got compared to Magneto: They both see their kinds as superior to regular folk.

Go on a social darwinism analogue
That's why they had Raven Branwen. The strong live, the weak die. Those are the rules.
 
I don't really hate any character, because it's been too long since I watched the show myself.

I do know my favourite character is/was Penny, because her death in V3 was the exact moment I emotionally tuned out of the show.
Well....Volumes 7 and 8 gotta be pretty hard on Penny fans.
 
Well....Volumes 7 and 8 gotta be pretty hard on Penny fans.
It's insane that a big criticism of Penny's "death" in Volume 3 was that she was a robot so she could be rebuilt and wasn't even badly damaged enough to not consider it and it got ignored for years. She's treated as dead for real in the show and the writers never want to actually address how dumb that is. Then suddenly she comes back having been rebuilt YEARS after the fact, only for them to bullshit turning her into a human and then killing her off again. It's like they were so butthurt about the obvious plothole they thought they could be clever (and I use that word loosely here) and bring her back to kill her off as a human just so they could go "No! She's dead! Shut up!"

And Miles Luna wonders why people accuse Jaune of being his self-insert.
I admit I wouldn't have been on the side of saying Jaune was his self insert at first because I'll at least say Jaune had a character for the first couple seasons. He wasn't perfect and suffered for misakes, and learned. But in Volume 3 Jaune suddenly felt lifeless, Volume 4 he was just there as an accessory to Ren's garbage generic backstory, then in Volume 5 he gets a stupid deus ex machina Semblance that magics Weiss out of a mortal injury and later after they gave him the banana haircut he's suddenly seen as an uber chad who all the ladies in town are thirsting after... yeah now I agree he's definitely a self insert. I guess we can attribute Jaune having a character at all to Monty being there and being the main creative force for the beginning. Monty may not be a great writer who sucks at establishing worldbuilding but damn at least when he was involved in writing characters they didn't all feel boring and/or insanely unlikable.
 
And Miles Luna wonders why people accuse Jaune of being his self-insert.
Whether Jaune is a self-insert or not is kinda irrelevant. Luke Skywalker is based around a lot of George Lucas’ own youth life (ffs Luke S.), hell Monty voiced Ren until he died, and because Ren has barely had any presence nobody cared.
Jaune’s a fine enough character when Volume 4 hit, then Volume 8 opened a lot of older wounds for the community.
It's insane that a big criticism of Penny's "death" in Volume 3 was that she was a robot so she could be rebuilt and wasn't even badly damaged enough to not consider it and it got ignored for years. She's treated as dead for real in the show and the writers never want to actually address how dumb that is.
Probably because a big speculation around the time Penny died was that since she has Aura and therefore a soul, future appearance would have her completely reset and might as well be something else completely. Penny was treated as dead for real because people genuinely believed that the Penny we know and love was gone forever.
At least until Volume 7 came around and… didn’t do that at all.
 
Whether Jaune is a self-insert or not is kinda irrelevant. Luke Skywalker is based around a lot of George Lucas’ own youth life (ffs Luke S.), hell Monty voiced Ren until he died, and because Ren has barely had any presence nobody cared.
Jaune’s a fine enough character when Volume 4 hit, then Volume 8 opened a lot of older wounds for the community.
There's also the part where in seemingly every volume, Jaune gets soomething that seems main character oriented, with maybe the exception of Volume 2.
 
View attachment 2708780This is ignoring the fact that an army veteran was the main villain of the last volume, and that same character needing a prosthetic arm was a symbol of him "losing his humanity".
RWBY isn’t anti-military; Winter is a Marial Law-loving girlboss who defends the realm and never bends; Marrow defects; the Ace Ops save Harriet and are uncomfortable with Ironwood’s orders, etc. It doesn’t even really closely critique the military’s power; it’s just there as a background element when they make an insufferable bad guy try taking away Ironwood’s second council seat.
It does inadvertedly show that the Atlesian military is flawed in systemic ways in Atlas’ political system, it just doesn’t explore them a lot, and people are right to think that it’s flawed even if they’re annoying about it. Just because the Ace Ops aren’t going around commiting war crimes doesn’t mean that the military isn’t being politically corrupt in specific ways.
And Atlas’ military is kinda shit anyway. They royally botched Beacon, were in bed with corporations employing “controversial labor forces” (or did you guys forget all the v4 scenes with Jimmy being like “but we are bros!! how could you put your profits before ME??” to Jacq), have civilian political power, and can turn on Martial Law on a dime and suffer 0 consequences for killing an elected official.
Just because there’s a need for something doesn’t inherently mean that the people filling that need are going to be good at it.
 
Back
Top Bottom