Rutgers Declares Grammar Racist

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What the fuck. This is a disservice to their students. Watch what happens when some of these students try to use their "critical grammar" in papers/letters/presentations/other written products at work. That stuff will come flying right back, with changes indicated and demanded. The workplace expects professional, standard English. Military sure does. Can tell you senior officers have no problem making sure the written products they receive or are asked to sign are exactly the way they want them.

Rutgers Declares Grammar Racist
English Department pledges to incorporate 'critical grammar' into program
Old_Queens_New_Brunswick_NJ_-_looking_north_2014-736x514.jpg
Rutgers University / Wikimedia Commons

Chrissy Clark - JULY 24, 2020 4:00 PM

The English department at a public university declared that proper English grammar is racist.

Rutgers University's English department will change its standards of English instruction in an effort to "stand with and respond" to the Black Lives Matter movement. In an email written by department chairwoman Rebecca Walkowitz, the Graduate Writing Program will emphasize "social justice" and "critical grammar."

Walkowitz said the department would respond to recent events with "workshops on social justice and writing," "increasing focus on graduate student life," and "incorporating ‘critical grammar' into our pedagogy." The "critical grammar" approach challenges the standard academic form of the English language in favor of a more inclusive writing experience. The curriculum puts an emphasis on the variability of the English language instead of accuracy.

"This approach challenges the familiar dogma that writing instruction should limit emphasis on grammar/sentence-level issues so as to not put students from multilingual, non-standard ‘academic' English backgrounds at a disadvantage," Walkowitz said. "Instead, it encourages students to develop a critical awareness of the variety of choices available to them [with] regard to micro-level issues in order to empower them and equip them to push against biases based on ‘written' accents."

Additionally, the department said it will provide more reading to upper-level writing classes on the subjects of racism, sexism, homophobia, and related forms of "systemic discrimination."

Leonydus Johnson, a speech pathologist and libertarian activist, said the school's change makes the racist assumption that minorities cannot comprehend traditional English. Johnson called the change "insulting, patronizing, and in itself, extremely racist."

"The idea that expecting a student to write in grammatically correct sentences is indicative of racial bias is asinine," Johnson told the Washington Free Beacon. "It's like these people believe that being non-white is an inherent handicap or learning disability…. That's racism. It has become very clear to me that those who claim to be ‘anti-racist' are often the most racist people in this country."

Rutgers's new anti-racist language standard comes alongside a litany of changes at other universities. Princeton University's board of trustees voted to remove Woodrow Wilson's name from its public policy school and one of its residential colleges to denounce the former president's "racist thinking and policies." The James Madison residential college at Michigan State University is considering making a similar change. Activists at the University of Pittsburgh have called for the firing of any employee deemed racist or discriminatory by students, and the school said it will give the demands "serious consideration."
The Rutgers English department created a Committee on Bias Awareness and Prevention in 2012. In light of Black Lives Matter protests, the school has moved past bias awareness and prevention and into a focus on "decolonization." Walkowitz's email talks of "decolonizing the writing center." The department offers a specific internship titled "Decolonizing the Writing Center" to "make the writing centers more linguistically diverse."

The university and Walkowitz did not respond to requests for comment.


 
Society at large isn't going to adapt to these standards.

They're betting on a combination of white guilt, social media unpersoning and mobs in the street that will attack anyone labeled "racist" to take care of that little triviality.
 
My friend Mark used to do this this thing with me where when one of his friends put out a particularly egregious bit of ebonics, he and I would adopt the faux-elitist voice of a collegiate don and try to say the sentence they said in a way that tried to make it sound sophisticated, usually making our friends lose their shit laughing (even the dude who was trying to form a sentence). Trying to put together a phrase like "I been had that, y'all" with the Locust Valley Lockjaw accent remains a high-point of comedic idiocy more people should attempt.
 
They realize that these people have to be hired, right? Society at large isn't going to adapt to these standards. Not recognizing that is pure idiotic nonsense.

You're just handicapping students. This goes to show how entitled these people are. The world will not bend for you
And we thought troons were going to go away, once society at large got wind of them and their pure idiotic nonsense...
 
at least half the idiots applauding this shit are of the mindset that "It's raaaaaaaayyyyyysciiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiissssssssmussssssss" to try to make black people write/speak English decipherably/properly because "Muh Blek Culchuh". HOW DARE WE prevent them from practicing their culture! Think of the children! Think of the children's FEELINGS! Oh, won't anyone think of the children's feelings?

Which is ironic, because Ebonics/"African-American Vernacular" originally was cribbed off of southern white people, then cranked up to 11.
 
I work in a clinical/scientific field with a global team. Maybe half of us speak English as a second language. Everyone is very forgiving of the occasional mistakes that engenders, but the mistakes non native speakers make are specific and do not ‘degrade’ the language. For us all to work together we need a common standard, and if we were not able to communicate in a precise way, we’d not be able to do what we do.
If you e ever worked in this kind of international environment you’ll know that overly colloquial English is avoided like the plague. I remember seeing an American speaker talk about something not being his first rodeo and losing the audience immediately because they didn’t get the idiom. You have to be able to communicate - minor errors don’t harm that in most situations, but overly colloquial does.
They are actively harming their students- rather like the ‘woke maths’ programs in public schools.
You improve equality through rigorous teaching and dragging everyone up to as high a standard as you can. Not this
 
I work in a clinical/scientific field with a global team. Maybe half of us speak English as a second language. Everyone is very forgiving of the occasional mistakes that engenders, but the mistakes non native speakers make are specific and do not ‘degrade’ the language. For us all to work together we need a common standard, and if we were not able to communicate in a precise way, we’d not be able to do what we do.

This is why engineering students all learn german, or used to.
 
Someone who truly knows how to write and how to communicate effectively and has well-thought-out arguments doesn't need to fall back on academic jargon. They can explain their thoughts in a way that's understandable to the average college-educated reader.
you dont even need to know how to write... english lacks the ability to communicate idea above a certain level of complexity/out of the boy thinking.


It actually takes a lot to learn how to organize your thoughts in a way that makes it understandable to others, and that could easily be the single most important life skill.
but that has nothing to do with the language. i mean French is a terrible language and you can still tell a story with it.

For us all to work together we need a common standard, and if we were not able to communicate in a precise way, we’d not be able to do what we do.
you cant communicate precise in english.

I dont get the problem. i only had 3 years english in school and i was high most of that time.
and my english is good enough to communicate or even write papers and shit
 
At this point, I'm unironically for a figurative day of the rope in academia. Houses need to be cleaned.

The big question is, how do you purge the system effectively without damaging the system beyond repair? I'm sure people will say "all liberal arts and social sciences gone", but many of those disciplines are very infected and actually important, and STEM isn't fully insulated from activist imbeciles and thus also needs addressing.

The best method is going after every financial resource unis have. Donations large and small, sports revenue, public funding, research funding, etc. The only consequences universities understand are financial, and those make them suddenly very utilitarian.

Look at Mizzou. They had a 33%+ drop in class size for a couple of years after their BLM stunt, forcing layoffs, closures and other significant consequences. Their alumni were furious, resulting in a gratuitous drop in donations as well. You'll notice that Mizzou hasn't said or done a single controversial things since, and they've slowly, quietly built themselves back.

The same thing needs to be applied everywhere else. While a privileged few schools like Harvard and Yale are pretty financially insulated from consequences, most large, well-known schools are very vulnerable to funding drops because they constantly overextend themselves to grow in power and influence. Even the very wealthy, old money private schools aren't completely immune, though it would take more financial pullback than is realistic OR a big recession that hit their endowments hard.... like the kind that the extended COVID situation and its aftermath could produce...

There needs to be a reckoning, because the hard lessons of Mizzou and Evergreen (which is moving towards the brink of closure after doing little to fix their fuck-up) are apparently not affecting change. The pussification and reduced effectiveness of US academic institutions is bad for the US as a whole.
 
If you e ever worked in this kind of international environment you’ll know that overly colloquial English is avoided like the plague. I remember seeing an American speaker talk about something not being his first rodeo and losing the audience immediately because they didn’t get the idiom. You have to be able to communicate - minor errors don’t harm that in most situations, but overly colloquial does.

A German guy I was pen-pals with back in the 90's before email said that exact same thing.

Learning English is hard for a multitude of reasons, and one big one is the fact your average English speaker lapses into idioms and such without even knowing it. So the first time a guy says to him "Here's an idea I'd like to just trot out there" an ESL person is double-burdened with getting the literal translation right, then the colloquial one, and before replying, wondering: "I hope this doesn't embarrass me because it sounds like he was just talking about horses.."

He liked academic situations more than personal ones because everyone there was talking the "same language".

Had no problem around the table at work, but once the meeting was adjourned and everyone went to the bar... he felt deeply out of place.
 
Last edited:
At this point, I'm unironically for a figurative day of the rope in academia. Houses need to be cleaned.

The big question is, how do you purge the system effectively without damaging the system beyond repair? I'm sure people will say "all liberal arts and social sciences gone", but many of those disciplines are very infected and actually important, and STEM isn't fully insulated from activist imbeciles and thus also needs addressing.

The best method is going after every financial resource unis have. Donations large and small, sports revenue, public funding, research funding, etc. The only consequences universities understand are financial, and those make them suddenly very utilitarian.

Look at Mizzou. They had a 33%+ drop in class size for a couple of years after their BLM stunt, forcing layoffs, closures and other significant consequences. Their alumni were furious, resulting in a gratuitous drop in donations as well. You'll notice that Mizzou hasn't said or done a single controversial things since, and they've slowly, quietly built themselves back.

The same thing needs to be applied everywhere else. While a privileged few schools like Harvard and Yale are pretty financially insulated from consequences, most large, well-known schools are very vulnerable to funding drops because they constantly overextend themselves to grow in power and influence. Even the very wealthy, old money private schools aren't completely immune, though it would take more financial pullback than is realistic OR a big recession that hit their endowments hard.... like the kind that the extended COVID situation and its aftermath could produce...

There needs to be a reckoning, because the hard lessons of Mizzou and Evergreen (which is moving towards the brink of closure after doing little to fix their fuck-up) are apparently not affecting change. The pussification and reduced effectiveness of US academic institutions is bad for the US as a whole.

There needs to be a very strict academically definition of academic work...but we already have this. What's going is that people are either too lazy or too butthurt to even work to strive for academic excellence.
Academic excellence isn't racism it exceeds racism.
 
The big question is, how do you purge the system effectively without damaging the system beyond repair?
Pop the student debt bubble. When students realise that going to Wankchester Poly to do gender studies will land them so far in debt they’ll have a net disadvantage in life, things might change. They should realise already but the system is still working. Everyone knows they won’t get decent jobs, but students are still being conned into the pipeline, still doing these shite courses. That expands the university system to the point where anyone can get a job in it. If the whole system was smaller, we’d be seeing only the best courses survive and only those that are run by proper academics, to give proper educations. The only way to do this now is by some sort of catastrophic collapse of the student debt industry. No debt forgiveness.

edited to reply to stone heart. Yeah your English is fine (almost perfect actually) but I’m not talking about the odd grammatical error, but about being too colloquial. I can understand some euro fresh off the plane with high school English no problem but I’d bet that most Americans would need subtitles on a Rab C Nesbitt episode.
 
There needs to be a very strict academically definition of academic work...but we already have this. What's going is that people are either too lazy or too butthurt to even work to strive for academic excellence.
Academic excellence isn't racism it exceeds racism.

The Ivory Tower and Media types have been pushing hard for years that standards of success that aren't race-based are still racist and thus cannot be enforced.

Despite the fact that NOWHERE in ANY dictionary is there a disclaimer "this is how white people spell things and think you should too" . Yet they've declared that doing your best to use correct spelling and correct wording is racist.

They've adopted the ruinous ghetto ideal that trying your best is for "whitey" , because like all educational reformists, when students fail, they strive to re-classify success than try and teach harder.
 
Back
Top Bottom