Rutgers Declares Grammar Racist

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
What the fuck. This is a disservice to their students. Watch what happens when some of these students try to use their "critical grammar" in papers/letters/presentations/other written products at work. That stuff will come flying right back, with changes indicated and demanded. The workplace expects professional, standard English. Military sure does. Can tell you senior officers have no problem making sure the written products they receive or are asked to sign are exactly the way they want them.

Rutgers Declares Grammar Racist
English Department pledges to incorporate 'critical grammar' into program
Old_Queens_New_Brunswick_NJ_-_looking_north_2014-736x514.jpg
Rutgers University / Wikimedia Commons

Chrissy Clark - JULY 24, 2020 4:00 PM

The English department at a public university declared that proper English grammar is racist.

Rutgers University's English department will change its standards of English instruction in an effort to "stand with and respond" to the Black Lives Matter movement. In an email written by department chairwoman Rebecca Walkowitz, the Graduate Writing Program will emphasize "social justice" and "critical grammar."

Walkowitz said the department would respond to recent events with "workshops on social justice and writing," "increasing focus on graduate student life," and "incorporating ‘critical grammar' into our pedagogy." The "critical grammar" approach challenges the standard academic form of the English language in favor of a more inclusive writing experience. The curriculum puts an emphasis on the variability of the English language instead of accuracy.

"This approach challenges the familiar dogma that writing instruction should limit emphasis on grammar/sentence-level issues so as to not put students from multilingual, non-standard ‘academic' English backgrounds at a disadvantage," Walkowitz said. "Instead, it encourages students to develop a critical awareness of the variety of choices available to them [with] regard to micro-level issues in order to empower them and equip them to push against biases based on ‘written' accents."

Additionally, the department said it will provide more reading to upper-level writing classes on the subjects of racism, sexism, homophobia, and related forms of "systemic discrimination."

Leonydus Johnson, a speech pathologist and libertarian activist, said the school's change makes the racist assumption that minorities cannot comprehend traditional English. Johnson called the change "insulting, patronizing, and in itself, extremely racist."

"The idea that expecting a student to write in grammatically correct sentences is indicative of racial bias is asinine," Johnson told the Washington Free Beacon. "It's like these people believe that being non-white is an inherent handicap or learning disability…. That's racism. It has become very clear to me that those who claim to be ‘anti-racist' are often the most racist people in this country."

Rutgers's new anti-racist language standard comes alongside a litany of changes at other universities. Princeton University's board of trustees voted to remove Woodrow Wilson's name from its public policy school and one of its residential colleges to denounce the former president's "racist thinking and policies." The James Madison residential college at Michigan State University is considering making a similar change. Activists at the University of Pittsburgh have called for the firing of any employee deemed racist or discriminatory by students, and the school said it will give the demands "serious consideration."
The Rutgers English department created a Committee on Bias Awareness and Prevention in 2012. In light of Black Lives Matter protests, the school has moved past bias awareness and prevention and into a focus on "decolonization." Walkowitz's email talks of "decolonizing the writing center." The department offers a specific internship titled "Decolonizing the Writing Center" to "make the writing centers more linguistically diverse."

The university and Walkowitz did not respond to requests for comment.


 
This should be a story in the Times and Tucker should cover it. Let it be known publicly that Rutgers has made this decision and let students, and parents decide if that's where they want to spend 250k for a 4 year education.
 
That would be preferable to the gobbledegook that halftards like that Kunte Kendi guy spew. Give me some honest ebonics over pseudo-intellectual collegiate buzzword salad any day.

Shit, ebonic collegiate gobbledegook is bound to emerge, and we'll all have to pretend its wonderful like with the rest of retarded black culture or else racist. Dammit!


At the rate he's been rolling he'll be drilling tunnels all across the globe.

Speaking as someone currently in college and has seen the gamut of bad writing (from students who barely graduated high school to "elite" students who clearly don't understand what "ontology" means), I think they spring from the same source.

Someone who truly knows how to write and how to communicate effectively and has well-thought-out arguments doesn't need to fall back on academic jargon. They can explain their thoughts in a way that's understandable to the average college-educated reader.

Students who don't know how to write will throw big words into their writing, thinking it makes them sound smart, but, in reality, they only sound smart to other idiots. And any students Rutgers passes despite being subliterate are at the highest risk of larding their writing with big words they don't understand. If anything, that side of academic writing will only get worse.

It's honestly leading up to idiocracy speak. There should be a graduate level program that focuses on this. Once you've achieved a mastery of the English language you should be able to enroll in courses that study creative ways to break it.

But undermining the language as a whole? How the fuck is anyone going to be able to read books more than 30 years old if their English is 100% contemporary dialect?

It's like how Picasso was painting photo-realistic art when he was still a child. To know how to break the rules in new and creative ways, you need to know what the rules are. I'll bet that any exceptionally well-written novel that plays with structure and language was written by someone with high-tier knowledge of proper English grammar (or whatever the author's first language is).

That said i'd like to know what happens if one of the students refuses to comply with these idiotic changes and sticks to proper grammar. What are they going to do? Discipline or expel the student for using proper english grammar in an english course? Yeah that totally won't backfire and end up getting the school sued and the department of education involved at all

They're not going to punish the actually good writers in these programs. They're just going to give too-high grades to bad writers and won't correct them, which will degrade the value of a Rutgers degree over time.

Meanwhile, any student who has gotten to college who still doesn't understand the basics of English writing has so many issues with communication, making English professors not correct them or pass them when they should have failed is putting the professors in an impossible position. I fear that most of the professors will be cowed into simply not correcting or downgrading their "BIPOC" students at all, which means they won't even be trying to help them communicate effectively, regardless of their spelling and grammar.

It actually takes a lot to learn how to organize your thoughts in a way that makes it understandable to others, and that could easily be the single most important life skill.
 
And what, pray tell, should I think of Rutgers if one of your graduates walks into my office, English Diploma in hand and presents me a resume so riddled with misspellings I can't tell if he's trying to get a job or rob me?

And when that point is made, furthermore, what should I think when he spouts off in indecipherable Ebonics that even Mushmouth from Fat Albert and the Cosby Kids would say "Waymin...whut?" ?

That this is clearly a person deserving of my consideration? When I can't understand them? After they ALLEGEDLY were educated by you to communicate?

How is that supposed to make me think anything good of him or YOUR university?

Oh, heh, silly me, it's current year, I have to give him a job or else my "Racist" business will be burned to the ground, sorry for ever doubting your genius plan......

More and more these days, you apply for jobs online instead of applying in person. Makes it easier to disregard the fool who provides a resume written in Rutgers Dumbshit.

In the military, nope. Any dumbassed second lieutenant who provided any sort of written product using such "English" would find themselves quickly corrected, in detail, by their boss. Communications skills, written ad oral, are a large part of being an officer. During my time on active duty communications skills were a formal area of evaluation on the officer performance report. Can also tell you the military spends a good deal of time within their professional military education courses on written and oral communications skills.

Oh, in the military if you ever write an email/other communication to your boss or other upper echelon featuring the term "I feel X, Y,", expect to be told to use "I believe" instead. Learned that over thirty years ago as a young staff officer.
 
Remove all state and federal funding from Rutgers.

If they are not going to teach they have no reason to receive money.

I used to laugh at tax protestor bullshit but...
 
More and more these days, you apply for jobs online instead of applying in person. Makes it easier to disregard the fool who provides a resume written in Rutgers Dumbshit.

In the military, nope. Any dumbassed second lieutenant who provided any sort of written product using such "English" would find themselves quickly corrected, in detail, by their boss. Communications skills, written ad oral, are a large part of being an officer. During my time on active duty communications skills were a formal area of evaluation on the officer performance report. Can also tell you the military spends a good deal of time within their professional military education courses on written and oral communications skills.

Oh, in the military if you ever write an email/other communication to your boss or other upper echelon featuring the term "I feel X, Y,", expect to be told to use "I believe" instead. Learned that over thirty years ago as a young staff officer.
To those wondering exactly why communications skills are necessary in the military, when a senior officer gives jumbled, incomplete orders, you get the Light Brigade boldly riding and well into the jaws of death, into the gates of hell. While the poem is certainly a very grand telling, do remember that 600 excellent soldiers got chopped into hamburger on a suicidal charge because the guy giving orders was a fuck-up.
 
When I was in school and had to read Mark Twain, the blacks were up in arms about how Nigger Jim's dialogue was phonetically written in the grammatically incorrect Negro dialect of the era, because it made him sound like a minstrel show caricature. But now it's racist not to allow people to write in the grammatically incorrect Negro dialect of the present day. How things change!

(also the blacks were obviously up in arms about how Nigger Jim's name was not censored)
 
So instead of Reading, Writin’, ‘Rithmatic, the 3 R’s now stand for Racism, Racism, Racism.

Reminds me of an old Tim Sample joke “I graduated college with a BS, an MS, and a PhD. Everyone knows what BS is. MS is more-of-the-same. PhD is Piled High & Deep.”
 
Everyone in the scientific field will be mocking all research and papers from Rutgers.

Eyeroll really hard.

Sorry for ths double post but Rutgers uni is a floating village of idiots because writing papers now come with grammarly and turnitin and other software that can go voice to writing. Most colleges have writing tutors and support on all levels.

20200707_002734.jpg


This IS PHENOMENAL BULLSHIT. ON THE SCALE OF HUGE SHIT, SHITTY, SHIT.
 
So let me get this straight. Rutgers made a boneheaded move to declare grammar racist because "minorities can't comphrend proper English" in college?

News flash, if English is your first language, you're expected to have a moderate understanding of how it works. So now they're encouraging their students to speak in "ebonics" with broken English? No grasp on when to use proper syntax for verbs, punctuation, word choice, subject-verb agreement, et al?

That won't fly in an entry level job for most fields. Say you're doing international business with another country and they hear you talk with carefree "English", they'll leave and go elsewhere. Especially that other countries have been learning how English works for years, only to find their work go down the drain because it's racist.

You're paying to go to school to be illiterate. I can't believe this.

This isn't new, lots of high schools have been pushing this sort of shit for years. It's just finally getting put into colleges. This is what you get when racist progressives think hood rats represent all black people.
 
But undermining the language as a whole? How the fuck is anyone going to be able to read books more than 30 years old if their English is 100% contemporary dialect?
Isn't that the point though, anything past 5-10 years is history, and history is wiped from everything before people start figuring out, that life was different and often better, before Idiocracy became more than a movie.
 
They realize that these people have to be hired, right? Society at large isn't going to adapt to these standards. Not recognizing that is pure idiotic nonsense.

You're just handicapping students. This goes to show how entitled these people are. The world will not bend for you
 
Back
Top Bottom